Tweet épinglé
Supreme Leader Wiggum
31.9K posts

Supreme Leader Wiggum
@ScriptedAlchemy
Infra Architect @ ByteDance. Maintainer of @webpack @rspack_dev - creator of #ModuleFederation #auADHD #synesthesia own opinions.
Redmond, WA Inscrit le Haziran 2018
727 Abonnements18.6K Abonnés

- 1 agent per file is really nice for refactor stuff
- 1 agent for each review note codex left to verify and fix
- monitoring CI
- research subagent works better than expected
- parallizing work within one big job (do ___ to each of these clips)
Rhys@RhysSullivan
@davis7 What do you use their background jobs for? Anything explicit or is it more when it goes “I’ll monitor for CI to pass” Dynamic workflows are pretty good also
English

@ScriptedAlchemy @intellijidea lol it needed an hour to generate the answer 🤣
English

@wordmandotdev @intellijidea Says decade plus, does it in 3 hours.
English

@ScriptedAlchemy Think it will be on par w Fable? I'm a Codex stan but Fable was on a completely whole new level
English

get rid of your humans and lets your infra team talk to the humans agents instead :P
Jiahan Chen@jiahan_c
@ScriptedAlchemy The best part is that Codex gives enough context to describe the whole issue. In my experience, getting humans to do that is the hard part 😄
English

@ScriptedAlchemy The best part is that Codex gives enough context to describe the whole issue. In my experience, getting humans to do that is the hard part 😄
English

@CaddyComa i think complexity has ticked up in recent years but hope to simplify it further in near future
English

@ScriptedAlchemy What's really admirable is how good this stuff works in production. It just works™
Great job simplifying this en masse, it takes a lot of effort to get to such a distilled abstraction. KUDOS
English

It’s actually insane 10 million weekly’s. More downloads than angular
heal@2hea1
A memorable moment! Module Federation Runtime has surpassed 10 million weekly downloads 🎉 Thank you for using our code.❤️
English
Supreme Leader Wiggum retweeté

@ScriptedAlchemy @tlakomy Literally the only thing my manager knows AI related are the words cursor, claude and open ai. Nothing past that.
Saw reports of a whole other dev team under her using haiku as of last week (since late last year)
It is an absolute shit show in large enterprise
English
Supreme Leader Wiggum retweeté

The backtest uses online updates. So I label the data. Train model. Then use point in time replay, so backtesting it does online training since that’s just part of the system. If I just used the same checkpoint and Ran the same backtest twice, the second time it would be improved due to online parts.
English

@ScriptedAlchemy That makes sense.
Last thing I’m curious about: do you train from simulated labels only after the full 2-6 week path is known, or do you also do online updates from interim mark-to-market premium path outcomes before the trade would have exited?
English

Use custom universe currently since I need training data on something. Opra data backfill is massive. Terabytes. So I use universe, then I have separate project that was experimental where I just use recommendation engine and bluesky firehose to rank accounts by accuracy and lead time. Then use that to build reputation database and discover instruments through social data for potential use. If don’t have to train on it all, then I’d just open socket connection that watches top 500 or top 1000 stocks by market cap. Let online training work it out in sparse heads/prime it with historical
English

@ScriptedAlchemy How are you finding the Stocks to watch? Do you scan a custom universe daily? Also any chance you share it?
English

@HashemKhalifa Model figures out weighting on its own. I create real simulation using OPRA quotes and trades, with slippage and latency. Little approximation since I have the order book. Lots of data labeling materialization. Watch for over fitting. Never test on data you trained on.
English

@ScriptedAlchemy One follow-up if you’re willing: when you optimized for 30% monthly return, did you train that as a direct portfolio simulation objective, or use weighted per-example labels that approximate monthly capital-cycle return?
English











