dwasse

Interesting how unprecedented amounts of QE had absolutely nothing to do with rising inflation, and now QT is guaranteed to lower it

Cortex L1 - blockchains, unified. Secured by $SYN

Supporting crypto is a political IQ test

OpenSuccession

The wait is over. The Interchain future is here. Testnet live today! Synapse Interchain Network: the first Optimistic Proof of Stake Interchain Network Synapse Chain: An L2 built on the Syn OP stack. Apps deployed have access to all interchain state Let's go Synterchain 🧵

if anyone's interested in contributing to @SynapseProtocol, highly recommend you add a review for this pr: github.com/synapsecns/san… The more eyes, the better

@wilburforce_ From the beginning we should have just asked SBF how he would play the St. Petersburg paradox

>Ok, but let’s say there’s a game: 51% [chance] you double the earth out somewhere else, 49% it all disappears. And would you keep on playing that game, double or nothing? SBF: Yeah…take the pure hypothetical… yeah.

If nance were to invest in rollbit I think CT would explode

If an exchange offers “zero slip” trading, then profitability is not as simple as volume * fees. But surely that is obvious right?

Given FTX happened, what was the probability rumors would spread about nance? When faced with uncertainty, bayes is all we know

GTX is now unironically the appropriate name for FTX 2.0

If you claim “no orderbook means no market impact” then it follows that you think GLP is a massive ball of dead money that’s impartial to changes in exposure

It’s quite simple really, mkt impact of GMX liquidations is proportional to % of GLP that hedges debt exposure

@shan3v Right- I would just argue append-only semantics are cleaner and easier to track, especially if you end up squashing anyway

@_dwasse Rebasing is more for local branches to pull in upstream changes while maintaining a linear history

(potentially?) unpopular opinion: Merging is almost always superior to rebasing, especially if main branch uses squash & merge

AI as dev tooling is super dynamic right now, but my current assessment: - Overrated for writing tests; hard to convey context and styling especially with large codebase - Underrated for utility tasks, i.e. "produce script to inject several files with common data", etc

@buffalu__ @gakonst It’s this thing you ask the magic AI to write for you so you can check off a box and never think about it again

@gakonst what’s a “test”?

functions with side effects are the root of all evil - just make your function do 1 thing and write tests for it. no "foo_or_bar" allowed.

“I didn’t take a massive drawdown in 2022; my shitcoins are strictly Hold To Maturity”

@TheStalwart @DominiqueGrey @cobie Could you please ask: "Poll: would you willingly lend your funds to a bank that is not TBTF if there were no FDIC protection?"

@DominiqueGrey @cobie No, that's not obvious. The point is, when you defamiliarize something, and put a certain kind of business practice into a new light, and get interesting results, we should take that seriously.

Um? Could the tech backlash be a lot worse than we realize? Over 700 votes so far, and the majority of respondents don't think tech startups should be allowed to have bank accounts

How about we simply make banks custodians of your money, unless you *explicitly* opt in to lending your funds with no FDIC protection? Or does that cut profits for too many middle men?

@KyleSamani With an internet connection and a bit of savviness it can generate its own pk and do some social engineering to acquire gas

If you give an LLM a pk, it becomes an AGI with the ability to spend money in meatspace