Randomity

@Oska3799 @catturd2 13 US Service members have been killed. Way too many but not 200+. Stop listening to your Islamic government

@catturd2 Thought they were already beaten, 200+ US already killed, F-15 and a Heli taken down today, F-15 downed last week, 2 carriers limping for repairs ,,,is anyone telling the truth here?

I'm hearing both pilots have been rescued now. Can anyone confirm?

Who could believe this nonsense? We’ve been at war with the Aliens and shot down thousands of aircraft? Yeah, that would be subtle… where is there any evidence of that? The more ridiculous part is the breeding program! lol. That’s pure lunacy. For a “breeding program” to even be possible, you’d have to assume aliens are biologically compatible with humans…. same chemistry, same genetic makeup, same reproductive mechanics. We can’t even interbreed with closely related species on Earth!! The idea that a creature from, perhaps thousand’s of light years away, just happens to be human-like enough to reproduce with humans isn’t reality, it’s beyond fantasy. This BS is really getting deep

UFO expert Steven Greer says a secret war between advanced civilizations and humans has been going on, with humans as the bad guys. He says Earth has been visited by non-hostile advanced civilizations and that humans are the ones hostile to them. He says Matt Gaetz is correct about a secret hybrid breeding program between aliens and humans, with the goal of combining DNA. "We have downed at least a thousand or more of their spacecraft." "We have captured those bodies, some living and some dead."

@rbits @IrrefutableV @spaceandtech_ You might’ve skipped the key line…. “there’s no evidence”. What you believe, what I believe, what he believes… doesn’t matter. “Open minds” don’t turn hypocriticals into reality.

@blind_randomity @IrrefutableV @spaceandtech_ What he believes is irrelevant. Your logic is that, based on our current understanding of space, time and physics, extraterrestrial visitation makes no sense. Probably impossible. But his argument is that your premises could be wrong, which is where "open your mind" is applicable

🚨 US Congressman Tim Burchett says if the public saw what he knows about UAPs and aliens, the country would come unglued and the Earth would be set on fire.

@PhenawmfromPA @kamil6416595628 Multiple instruments detecting something unusual is data. And it’s worth investigating. “not currently explained” ≠ “alien.”

@blind_randomity @kamil6416595628 What is your definition of evidence? Multiple instruments measuring a phenomenon not explainable by understood physics is what?

Tim Burchett: "If they would release the things that I have seen… You’d be up at night worrying or thinking about this stuff. We need to disclose it all. I was briefed two weeks ago… and it would upset the Earth."

Yes, the universe is massive. That might make life out there more plausible. But, what's foolish, it does not make aliens visiting Earth more likely. Distance and physics still matter. You can have billions of galaxies and still have zero civilizations that ever reach us. And guess what.... there's still no evidence proving me wrong.

@blind_randomity @spaceandtech_ Foolish. How many galaxies are there in the universe. Start there.

Aliens and God feel like some of the last modern myths still standing. I grew up watching Leonard Nimoy on the show "In Search Of" … always looking for the Loch Ness, Bigfoot, Yeti, Sasquatch, Noah’s Ark. Fun, mysterious, completely unproven and never found. Over time, all of those faded as would make sense, but Aliens and God didn’t. Not because we found proof, but because they’re hard to disprove, and people want to believe. When we can’t explain something, “God did it.” When we can’t identify something, it’s a UFO/Alien. And when details are missing, we fill them in with made up stories. But the core problem hasn’t changed: No proof. No evidence. No data. No confirmation. Just a modern version (they live amongst us) of the same old myth.

UFO FILES: As researchers are killed and go missing, and new revelations rock social media, @RobFinnertyUSA asks Rep. @timburchett where extraterrestrial matters stand today. "You'd be up at night" seeing what Burchett has seen - and "for the record, I'm not suicidal."

@n0tf0rpr0fit1 @spaceandtech_ Of course no one is omniscient. That’s exactly why science relies on shared, verifiable evidence, not hidden, hypothetical, or “it's out there somewhere.” If evidence exists, it can be examined, tested, and confirmed. If it can’t be, then it’s not evidence, it’s just speculation.

@blind_randomity @spaceandtech_ Why do you make so many presuppositions? You are claiming that there's no evidence as if youre omniscient and have seen everything. You are a frog in a well, and your perspective is limited to what your model was trained on. Many things exist outside your awareness, evidence too

@kamil6416595628 Apparently the new liberal move is just to swear more and call it a response. Cool. Still doesn’t turn “unidentified” into “alien,” and it definitely doesn’t create evidence where none exists. Stupidity and profanity aren’t proof. Data is.

@blind_randomity Holy fuck so delusional lol Millions of people see objects move at multiple mach every year, presidents say they had classified briefings, pilots describe tic tac shaped objects fly around, Navy complains about swarms of objects. "No verifiable evidence" dumbass

To be clear, right now we're strictly talking about aliens visiting earth? If so, There should be all kinds of evidence… direct contact, indisputable sightings, out-of-this-world materials, actual remains, or leftover technology. If something as extraordinary as interstellar travel to Earth actually happened, it wouldn’t be showing up as blurry videos and secondhand stories. And the idea that a civilization capable of crossing the universe makes it to earth, crashes and the local farmers drag the little humanoids into a barn is ridiculous. You don’t achieve that level of technology and then fail in the most basic way on arrival. Extraordinary claims should come with extraordinary evidence. Right now there is no evidence, only stories

@blind_randomity @spaceandtech_ What possible evidence could be provided? Its a logical deduction; if they can do it (and we cant) then that means they must be more advanced I can concede that there's evidence pro evolution, but that evidence would also conclude that intelligent self-aware life stands upright

“If they could get here, they must be beyond our understanding” isn’t evidence, it just a way to avoid using any. And evolution actually is supported by evidence, fossils, genetics, observable adaptation. It’s one of the most tested frameworks in science. “Maybe we were created” is fine as a belief, but it’s not a testable explanation. That’s the difference..... and I didn't even need AI

@blind_randomity @spaceandtech_ thanks, chatGPT. ... or you are wrong on both of your presuppositions. If they could get here, that would mean their technology (and thus their understanding of reality) exceeds ours to an unfathomable degree. You can't prove evolution either. Maybe we were created.

Quantum entanglement doesn’t do what you think it does. It doesn’t transmit matter, energy, or usable information faster than light, so it doesn’t solve travel at all. And “UAPs break physics” isn’t evidence that physics is wrong, it’s evidence we don’t fully understand what we’re observing yet. That happens all the time in science. The answer isn’t “therefore aliens,” or "It must be God", it’s “gather better data.” You don’t rewrite the laws of the universe based on unexplained sightings and/or assumptions. Extraordinary claims still require extraordinary evidence.

@blind_randomity @TheSonOfLiberty @akathekig @spaceandtech_ the fact that quantum entanglement exists renders your "limits" immaterial. the observed flight characteristics of UAPs (verified sightings) literally break what we THINK are the laws of physics. if they can "break" the rules then our understanding of the rules is wrong.

Huge numbers don’t prove what you think they do. Yes, there are ~10²³ stars. That might make life somewhere plausible. It says nothing about: • intelligent life • technological civilizations • their survival long enough to travel • or them reaching Earth And most importantly, it doesn’t solve distance. You can have a billion civilizations scattered across the universe and still have zero that ever reach earth. “Large numbers” isn’t evidence, it’s just scale.

@blind_randomity @joeroganhq “‘The odds are too small’ doesn’t mean what you think it means. There are ~10²³ stars in the observable universe. Even if life has a 1-in-a-trillion chance (10¹²), that still yields 10–1,000,000,000,000 instances. At cosmic scale, ‘impossible’ becomes inevitable.”

apply even basic logic. The distances alone kill it. We’re talking millions to billions of light years. The energy, time, and physics required to cross that, just to hover over cornfields or mess with navy pilots, it makes no sense. Then there’s evolution. Life on Earth took billions of years, countless extinction events, and sheer luck to get here. The odds of another species evolving not just intelligence, but technology, and then somehow becoming humanoid? Astronomically small. And yet somehow… no hard evidence. No verified materials, no bodies, no repeatable data. Just grainy videos, stories, and speculation. If aliens were here, it wouldn’t be subtle. It wouldn’t be debated. Until there’s real evidence, it’s just mythology dressed up in modern language.

“This Country Would Come Unglued” – Rep. Tim Burchett Comments on Recent Alien Claims Amidst Related Scientists Missing or Dead READ: thegatewaypundit.com/2026/04/this-c…

This isn’t about “current technology”, it’s about physics. Advancement doesn’t mean unlimited. No matter how smart a species is, they still have to deal with physics..... energy, time, and the structure of the universe. You don’t get to assume unknown breakthroughs, unknown biology, and unknown physics.... and call that an explanation. At some point, “they could have figured it out” just becomes a placeholder for missing evidence. That’s not a theory, it’s a guess.

@blind_randomity @akathekig @spaceandtech_ Your way of thinking is based upon current technology and the subsequent mode of transport that revolves around it. You cannot claim that advancements cannot solve those issues, especially if another species, with differing forms of logic, have somehow worked on it.

Bro. Most scientists think simple life elsewhere is possible. But aliens traveling to Earth? No credible evidence, major physics barriers, and the Fermi Paradox still stands: if they’re out there and capable, where are they? That’s why the scientific consensus is skepticism, not belief. Now you do your research....

@blind_randomity @spaceandtech_ Bro. Do some research instead of making shit up. No one thinks this. There are thousands of hours of testimony and research.

@IrrefutableV @spaceandtech_ You’re not “open-minded,” you’re just comfortable believing things that don’t require proof. There’s a difference.

@blind_randomity @spaceandtech_ You're thinking like a gnat would: limited by so many "rules" you have dictated to yourself are absolute. Open your mind.

@grendel_the @spaceandtech_ Maybe it was.... right up until you hit “send” on yours.

@blind_randomity @spaceandtech_ Possibly the dumbest answer yet

“they manipulate space/time” That’s not an argument, that’s science fiction. Warping space-time isn’t just “advanced tech,” it requires exotic matter, absurd amounts of energy, and assumptions we’ve never observed in reality. You can’t just swipe that away with “they’re more advanced.” And saying time is the enemy of evolution is just wrong. Evolution requires time, billions of years of it. Without time, nothing complex develops. What keeps happening in these arguments is simple... When the evidence is missing, the claims get bigger and less testable. “they’re too advanced to understand” “they use physics we can’t detect” “they manipulate space-time” At some point, that’s not science anymore, it’s make-believe . Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Right now, there isn’t any.

@blind_randomity @spaceandtech_ You’re viewing physics through the lens of a caveman. They don’t traverse space, they manipulate space/time. And btw, time is not on the side of evolution, it’s the enemy.

Yes, technology advances. No, it doesn’t magically erase the laws of physics. Even a civilization millions of years ahead still has to deal with energy, time, and the structure of the universe. Saying “they’re just more advanced than we can imagine” isn’t evidence, it’s an excuse to avoid needing any. And the chimp analogy misses the point completely. We can explain and demonstrate how satellites work. There’s proof. Repeatability. Data. With aliens visiting Earth? None of that exists. Just claims.

@blind_randomity @spaceandtech_ Ya “distance” The only argument you people have left and it’s close minded and juvenile Your mind cannot comprehend what billions of years of technological advances a single species can produce Try explaining how a satellite works to a chimp That’s not even close to equivalent