Evan Winget ⚡

959 posts

Evan Winget ⚡ banner
Evan Winget ⚡

Evan Winget ⚡

@evanwinget

San Francisco Inscrit le Ekim 2018
652 Abonnements431 Abonnés
Evan Winget ⚡
Evan Winget ⚡@evanwinget·
@hoffmang @jon_stokes Benchmarks are deceiving - IMO the open models are significantly more than 60 days behind the best models from the frontier labs
English
1
0
2
199
Gene Hoffman hoffmang.xch 🌱
@jon_stokes I think the safety net is the open source models are only about 30-60 days behind in quality. A painful reset but not a return to the old world
English
1
1
15
1.2K
Jon Brooks
Jon Brooks@jonbrooks·
@chamath what do you think about changing the capital gains rate to ordinary tax rates? what are the pro/cons?
English
1
0
0
1.1K
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
My bestie w the 🔥
david friedberg@friedberg

why not just raise income tax rates? because your real intent is not to just “provide healthcare”. you’re masking that you are proposing the creation of, for the first time in the 250 years of this American republic, an organized government seizure of private property from citizens. you’re calling it a “wealth tax” or a “billionaires tax” or “millionaires tax” or whatever nom du jour polls well. but at the end of the day, it’s the seizure of private property from citizens by the government. citizens that earned money, paid their fair taxes on those earnings (53% if they live in California) and are now being told they need to hand over after-tax assets because the government has failed to provide promised services with the revenue it’s collected, and are now re-casting their own failure to be a socio-economic inequity that must be justly resolved... a slippery slope that has never gone anywhere good (see economic effects in USSR, Cuba, Venezuela, France and Norway wealth tax etc.) the American founders fled tyranny in Europe and this amazing nation was populated by immigrants (myself and your parents) from around the world not just looking for a “better life” but for a place where they could have freedom from tyrannical governments that can take what they want from private citizens. a great nation borne of property rights, the rule of law, and endowed freedoms to believe, speak, or act. these principles led to the greatest run of innovations, successes, and widespread increase in prosperity, for all citizens, ever seen. the citizens, the individuals, not the institutions, delivered this progress. those who invented, who toiled, who bled, who sacrificed, who took risk and persevered, who led, and who changed the world, are not charlatans, kleptocrats, or oligarchs. they’re what made us all better off. prosperity is a measure of america’s success, not its failure. it is your principle that is so offensive, as evidenced by the broad disdain for your flippant flirtation with the darkest of human fantasy - socialism. you and other neo-socialists have led so many of us to reflect on America’s history and what it is becoming. that now leads so many to consider, so unnecessarily, leaving their homes for a place where everyone stands up to shout down the principle you suggest. because if your ideas are now considered moderate, it’s clear this titanic is sinking. that a “simple tax” of taking assets that have been earned, through toil and tribulation, rightly taxed, and preserved, should now be unjustly seized, is your solution to a problem of obvious government mismanagement and outright fraud, tells us that your true motivation lies not in giving people healthcare but in cutting down success and deleting the system of prosperity and opportunity for all. i don’t care, and neither should anyone else, what the sum total market value of a private citizens private assets might be. it is none of my business and should be none of yours. because, again, once you open that pandora’s box, we might as well study Lord of the Flies … there is literally nothing stopping 51% of citizens demanding that their government go out and seize 100% of the private property of the 49%. want to give healthcare to people in need? do your job and fix healthcare. make it affordable. want to be lazy about it? then do your job lazily and raise income taxes. want to take private property from private citizens who have paid their fair share of taxes and legally earned their property, then honestly declare that it is envy, not inequity, that you strive to resolve…

English
149
227
6.4K
462.3K
Evan Winget ⚡
Evan Winget ⚡@evanwinget·
@gladstein Drug wars, block dude, and Tetris were all super popular in my high school math classes
English
0
0
0
31
Alex Gladstein 🌋 ⚡
Alex Gladstein 🌋 ⚡@gladstein·
I wanna know if kids are back to playing drug wars on their Ti-83’s
New York Magazine@NYMag

When New York State banned phones in public schools from bell to bell this past September, the goal was undistracted learning. But within weeks of the Great Phone Lockup, teachers began to notice an incidental (and arguably even more compelling) benefit: The teens were talking to one another as if they were in a Brat Pack movie. Sure, there’s been grumbling and some burner phones and scrolling in the bathroom. But generally, with phones off-limits, the atmosphere feels different. There’s a pleasant buzz in the lunchroom, chatter in the hallways, and an alphabet of new analog hobbies popping up just about everywhere. “We’ve had a lot more school spirit,” said one senior at a charter school in Harlem. “People are more willing to do stuff.” What stuff are they doing? At many schools, teachers have made cards, board games, and sports equipment available during free time, and the kids have deigned to use them. Aidan Amin, a ninth-grader at Hunter College High School, is in a friend group that congregates in the school foyer to stack ‘OK Play’ tiles and compete at ‘Sorry!’ and other tabletop games during lunch. “I’d say it’s made us closer. Honestly, half the people I’m playing board games with I didn’t know at all before this,” Aidan says. Read more about how the state’s device ban has shifted the atmosphere in New York public schools: nymag.visitlink.me/R2A4ds

English
6
1
55
13.7K
Terry
Terry@Cardgames·
@rodarmor I mean… if you can find her L1 address you can forcibly tip :P
English
1
0
4
406
Casey
Casey@rodarmor·
i've been paying my hairdresser with lightning for almost five years and she showed me her balance today and she's stacked a little over $3900 in BTC
English
58
23
595
31.5K
Evan Winget ⚡ retweeté
Dylan Webster
Dylan Webster@DylanPWebster·
Awesome to see the power of the @10xGenomics Cloud Analysis (10xgenomics.com/cloud) back end come together with the accessibility of LLMs. Shout out to @evanwinget and Hayder Casey and our partners at @AnthropicAI for making it happen. #singlecell #bioinformatics #ai #genomics
10x Genomics@10xGenomics

What if you could simply ask your analysis tools for answers? We’re collaborating with @AnthropicAI to make that happen, working to turn #singlecell & #spatial analysis into a natural conversation, not a coding lesson. Learn more > bit.ly/43nBv6l

English
0
1
4
218
Evan Winget ⚡
Evan Winget ⚡@evanwinget·
@mononautical Is there a latency concern if their full node is geographically separated from their ASICs? This shouldn’t have any impact on where anyone can run ASICs
English
0
0
2
188
Evan Winget ⚡
Evan Winget ⚡@evanwinget·
@yakuhito @TibetSwap Got it - makes sense! I think it would cost the griefer 2x the amount that they’re ‘griefing’ by creating dust for the creator (since the taker also gets their own dust and has to pay for the partial offer), but it still seems valuable to mitigate!
English
1
0
2
48
yakuhito🌱
yakuhito🌱@yakuhito·
@evanwinget @TibetSwap That feature has been added, removed, and will be added again. The other 'protection' is that you can enforce that the other party pays at least a minimum fee of x for every fill
English
1
0
4
40
TibetSwap
TibetSwap@TibetSwap·
Today, we’re excited to reveal our design for partial offers, built in collaboration with @chia_project
English
4
62
138
21K
Evan Winget ⚡
Evan Winget ⚡@evanwinget·
@TibetSwap @yakuhito sorry haven’t read the CHIP yet, but is there a way for the creator to set a minimum partial take amount so that someone doesn’t grief you by creating a large number of dust coins that cost more to spend than they are worth?
English
1
0
2
40
TibetSwap
TibetSwap@TibetSwap·
When an offer is partially filled, the remainder directly rolls over into a new partial offer coin. The maker (creator) may claim the remainder any time by cancelling the offer through an on-chain transaction.
English
2
2
28
1.2K
The Mayor
The Mayor@MayorAbandoned·
Who wants this option? $1.00 wUSDC.b
The Mayor tweet media
English
5
7
31
1.4K
Evan Winget ⚡
Evan Winget ⚡@evanwinget·
Just invented a sandwich involving chicken tikka masala served between two slices of challah bread I call it: chicken tikka ma-challah 8/10 sandwich
English
1
0
6
147
Evan Winget ⚡
Evan Winget ⚡@evanwinget·
@jde5011 There are 4 halvings in the above hash rate graph - why are you worried about the next halving(s) when past performance indicates that a drop in block rewards has not lead to a sustained drop in hash rate?
English
1
0
1
74
jde5011.xch🌱
jde5011.xch🌱@jde5011·
@evanwinget What is that hash rate going to pursue when the network no longer pays the bounty they are pursuing? Until midnight every BTC maxi who's not mining is exit liquidity for the miners. A win pays off years of opex for some small shops. This doesn't work without a security budget.
English
1
0
3
137
jde5011.xch🌱
jde5011.xch🌱@jde5011·
BTC maxis are gonna be big mad about this one. This man speaks the truth.
Justin Bons@Justin_Bons

@Mierlo1999 The BTC meme coin is indeed one of the best examples Most are entirely unaware that BTC's security budget will run out within a decade. Forcing an inflation increase beyond the 21M limit... A terrible SoV then; being insecure & inflationary, yet popular narrative ignores this!

English
4
4
23
4.1K
Evan Winget ⚡
Evan Winget ⚡@evanwinget·
@chinaesq Prior to the CLARITY bill passing, projects don’t know what metrics will be used to measure maturity, so it makes sense to have a carve out for the folks who were operating (many in bad faith, many others in good faith) prior to having a regulatory framework to operate under
English
0
0
1
73
Thomas Chow 🌱
Thomas Chow 🌱@chinaesq·
@evanwinget I think the whole optional text needs to go. Either a blockchain is mature or not, and the policy goal is mature is what we want to allow to be less regulated. It's irrelevant when the system or token was launched.
English
1
0
6
213
Thomas Chow 🌱
Thomas Chow 🌱@chinaesq·
Sec 205 of updated CLARITY Act is a step backwards. It levels the playing field to allow *all* tokens at enactment an exemption--without regard for blockchain maturity. So again, bad tech, shills, and mockchain tokens will get off scott free. That's the WRONG policy outcome.
English
6
16
46
2.6K
Evan Winget ⚡
Evan Winget ⚡@evanwinget·
@hoffmang That’s exactly why folks are trying to find new solutions that dont require inbound liquidity (e.g. ark, spark)
English
1
0
0
225