Sarah Yip

1.8K posts

Sarah Yip banner
Sarah Yip

Sarah Yip

@yip_lab

Director, Yale Imaging & Psychopharmacology (YIP), Assoc Prof in Psychiatry & Child Study @yale, addiction, mood, neuroimaging, tries to predict clinical stuff

Inscrit le Şubat 2018
917 Abonnements1.7K Abonnés
Tweet épinglé
Sarah Yip
Sarah Yip@yip_lab·
Incredibly excited about this massive collaborative effort to longitudinally phenotype (for 2 years!) 1800 patients & 600 controls w/ MPIs @DrChrisPitt @PearlsonGodfrey. Too many rock star collaborators to name but here are a few w/ twitter: @RobbRutledge @_AnnaKonova_ @docqhuys
Yale Psychiatry@YalePsych

@YaleMed researchers have been awarded a $20.6 million federal grant for a five-year study of people with a wide range of mental illnesses. Project leaders are, from left, @DrChrisPitt, @yip_lab, and Dr. Godfrey Pearlson. tinyurl.com/299ru682

English
6
13
115
9.8K
Sarah Yip
Sarah Yip@yip_lab·
To apply email xiaosi.gu@yale.edu!!
Indonesia
0
0
1
113
Sarah Yip
Sarah Yip@yip_lab·
network - and these connections were distinct between the two traits! - thereby identifying a neural mechanism via which each trait may predispose to increased risk for alcohol use in youth 3/X
English
1
0
0
176
Sarah Yip
Sarah Yip@yip_lab·
New paper from @AnnieRHCheng in which she identifies neural signatures of impulsivity and neuroticism in youth (N~1100) w/ replication in #ABCD and tests for overlap with a previously validated alcohol neuromarker!!! 1/X nature.com/articles/s4138…
English
1
4
18
875
Sarah Yip
Sarah Yip@yip_lab·
Super cool stuff from a rock star team! Interested in development, executive functioning and computational psychiatry?? Then read this 😊🚀🚀🚀
Alex Weigard@AlexWeigard

Absolutely thrilled to see this paper finally out after many years of hard work by @rctomlinson! A deep dive, within a large developmental sample, into the ways evidence accumulation models do, and do not, improve inferences in the study of executive function and psychopathology.

English
0
0
1
284
Sarah Yip retweeté
Alex Weigard
Alex Weigard@AlexWeigard·
Absolutely thrilled to see this paper finally out after many years of hard work by @rctomlinson! A deep dive, within a large developmental sample, into the ways evidence accumulation models do, and do not, improve inferences in the study of executive function and psychopathology.
Rachel C. Tomlinson@rctomlinson

Have you ever wondered “how should I be analyzing my cognitive task data”? Well, I’ve been obsessed with that question since first reading @AlexWeigard’s work in 2020. And now our deep dive is out in the Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science! psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ab…

English
0
5
12
1.2K
Sarah Yip retweeté
ACNP
ACNP@ACNPorg·
Last chance! The deadline to submit poster abstracts is TODAY, August 28th at 5:00 pm Central. #ACNP2026 bit.ly/3TXuYcz
ACNP tweet media
English
1
3
7
1.6K
Sarah Yip retweeté
Sarah Yip retweeté
Siri Leknes
Siri Leknes@sirileknes·
What can *genetic insensitivity to opioids* teach us about endogenous opioid function in humans? Fully funded position in Oslo (PhD student or postdoc) Please RT Interested in pain, mu/kappa opioids, behavioural genetics, RCTs, or related? Apply here: 2411.webcruiter.no/Main2/Recruit/…
English
0
11
17
1.3K
Sarah Yip retweeté
Ted Satterthwaite
Ted Satterthwaite@sattertt·
Ecstatic to see the RBC paper out!! MAJOR congrats to all-star first-author @goliashf. RBC has been an amazing collab between #pennlinc & @childmindinst, led with the inimitable @MilhamMichael. So many thx to the many many many collabs that made RBC happen.
Golia Shafiei@goliashf

(1/17) Now out on bioRxiv‼️Reproducible Brain Charts: An open data resource for mapping brain development and its associations with mental health | doi.org/10.1101/2025.0… Funded by @NIMHgov

English
0
14
37
3.8K
Sarah Yip retweeté
Olivier George
Olivier George@brainaddiction·
It's clear that many do not understand what @NIH-funded research does to improve health. It's time to revive a study published 10 years ago that provides incredible information about this. link in the comment Every single new drug approved by the FDA from 2010–2016 was built on NIH-funded research—that’s all 210 drugs. But what the public sees is just the tip of the iceberg. Pharma takes credit for the final product, but beneath each drug developed, there are ~20 years of basic research, and 90% of the cost is from basic research funded by the NIH, which discovers drug targets, understands disease mechanisms, and creates life-saving treatments. Figuring out how cancer evades the immune system, how addiction rewires the brain, and how heart disease develops is the role of the NIH, creating the foundation for the breakthrough drugs that come 20 years later, and the NIH does all that with only 0.8% of the US budget. Without NIH, there would be no cancer immunotherapy, no anti-overdose medication, no anti-heart attack or stroke medication, no cutting-edge treatments. If NIH funding is cut, the iceberg will melt. That means fewer cures, more suffering, and more lives lost. The science beneath the surface keeps us afloat. Invest in NIH. Invest in life
Olivier George tweet media
English
77
413
962
155.7K