$MBOT HOUSE

@HillsboroughTap @storchyowl @swfc Shut up you fucking melt. Your bar is worst in Hillsborough by far.

Another amazing week in Sheffield with so many special moments. Every time I come here, I fall more in love with this city and its people, who have been so warm and welcoming. Great interactive Q&A with the @swfc staff at Hillsborough; their loyalty is admirable. We will restore joy and pride to the offices as we create a culture of excellence. I've been impressed with the strong civic leadership I've seen from Mayor @olivercoppard and @katejosephs. I have further enjoyed building a great relationship with Clive Betts. Also loved my time with Sheffield Wednesday Legend, @HirstyD9 who still has so much passion for the Owls. My team and I are working on so many important initiatives so that we can hit the ground running once we take over this wonderful club. Most notably; improvements to Hillsborough and the design of our kit and crest (stay tuned!😉). Had the opportunity to host a lunch at the outstanding new restaurant in the City Centre; Maria. You guys have to try it! We were joined by @LordBlunkett who enlightened us with his many stories spanning 75 years of genuine love for the club through the good times and not so. I finished my visit, stopping in at the Broomhill Tavern, relaxing over a pint with some new friends watching our match against Stoke City. I'd like to wish everybody a very Happy Easter weekend as we continue into next week heads down on this journey to rebuild this incredible football club. See you soon, David PS. was also lucky enough to find 2 vintage shirts @RagParade ... Love it! #wawaw #uto #swfc

@thecurioustales @grok what I don’t understand is why it’s made out to be such a revolutionary thing now when we went and even landed on it 50years ago. They can’t even land this time too but the tech is far far more advanced now.

🚨 This is exactly how the 4 moonbound astronauts will travel 400,000 km from Earth. Strap yourself to 4.1 million kilograms of controlled explosion and ride it to the edge of everything humans have ever known. The Artemis II trajectory reveals something most miss about deep space travel: you don’t pilot to the moon. You become cargo on a ballistic arc calculated with mathematical precision that would make ancient astronomers weep. Launch from Cape Canaveral begins with two solid rocket boosters generating 3.6 million pounds of thrust each. These aren’t engines you can throttle or shut off. Once lit, they burn until empty. You’re riding pure chemical violence upward at accelerations that compress your organs and blur your vision. Each booster burns through 1.1 million pounds of propellant in 120 seconds, generating more power than the entire electrical grid of most countries. When the boosters separate two minutes in, you’re already traveling 3,000 miles per hour. The core stage takes over, burning liquid hydrogen and oxygen through four RS-25 engines. These are the same engines that powered the Space Shuttle, but upgraded for deep space. Each engine operates at temperatures that would vaporize most metals, channeling combustion through nozzles engineered to nanometer tolerances. Six minutes after launch, the core stage drops away. You’re in low Earth orbit, but barely. The trajectory puts you in an elliptical path that skims the upper atmosphere. Solar arrays deploy like mechanical wings. Life support systems activate. Four humans now depend entirely on machines to survive in an environment that kills unprotected life in seconds. The next 90 minutes are psychological preparation for what comes next. You’re still close enough to Earth that if something fails catastrophically, you might survive reentry. After translunar injection, that safety net disappears completely. The Interim Cryogenic Propulsion System fires once. A single engine burn lasting minutes accelerates you to escape velocity: 25,000 miles per hour. You are now traveling faster than any human has traveled since 1972. The burn must be perfect. Too little thrust and you fall back to Earth. Too much and you overshoot the moon entirely, drifting into solar orbit with no possibility of rescue. What follows is four days of coasting through interplanetary space on a trajectory so precisely calculated that it accounts for the gravitational influence of the sun, Earth, moon, and even Jupiter. You’re riding a path through space and time that exists only because teams of mathematicians spent years modeling celestial mechanics down to the microsecond. The spacecraft carries no radar, no GPS, no external reference points. Navigation depends on star trackers that identify constellations and calculate position by comparing stellar angles to digital star maps. You navigate the same way Polynesian sailors did, except your ocean is vacuum and your destination moves 2,000 miles per hour relative to Earth. Seventy hours into the mission, you cross the point where lunar gravity becomes stronger than Earth’s pull. The mathematics of your trajectory flip. You’re no longer escaping Earth. You’re falling toward the moon. But you don’t land. The trajectory aims for the moon’s far side, using lunar gravity like a cosmic slingshot. As you swing around, the moon’s mass redirects your momentum back toward Earth. Ancient orbital mechanics discovered by Johannes Kepler 400 years ago bend spacetime to fling you home. The far side transit is when psychological isolation peaks. You pass behind the moon, losing radio contact with Earth for the first time since launch. The only humans in the solar system disappear behind 2,000 miles of lunar rock. Mission Control goes silent. You are alone with the machinery in ways no human has experienced since Apollo 17. During lunar approach, you fly closer to the moon’s surface than the International Space Station orbits Earth. Craters and mountains pass beneath at lunar dawn, shadows stretching across terrain untouched by atmosphere or weather for billions of years. You see geology older than complex life on Earth. The return trajectory begins automatically. Lunar gravity has already bent your path homeward. You’re riding Newton’s laws back across 400,000 kilometers of emptiness at speeds that compress the return journey into four days. Reentry begins 400,000 feet above the Pacific Ocean. The heat shield faces temperatures of 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit—hot enough to melt copper, approaching the surface temperature of the sun. Atmospheric friction converts 25,000 miles per hour into thermal energy that would vaporize the spacecraft without the carbon composite barrier between you and physics. Parachute deployment requires split-second timing. Deploy too early and the chutes shred in the hypersonic airflow. Deploy too late and you impact the ocean at terminal velocity. Main chutes slow you from 300 miles per hour to 20 miles per hour in seconds. The deceleration forces compress your spine and test the limits of human physiology. Pacific splashdown ends a ten-day journey covering 1.4 million miles. You return as the first humans to travel beyond Earth orbit in over fifty years, carrying radiation exposure from cosmic rays that passed through your body, and psychological changes from seeing Earth as a pale blue dot suspended in infinite dark. The entire mission depends on technologies working perfectly in an environment that destroys electronics, boils lubricants, and subjects every component to temperature swings of 500 degrees. One software glitch, one seal failure, one navigation error means four humans drift through space until life support expires. Engineering manages these risks through redundancy, testing, and margins of safety built into every system. But at 400,000 kilometers from Earth, margin for error approaches zero. Success requires mechanical perfection operating in conditions no Earth laboratory can fully simulate. We call it exploration, but what Artemis II really tests is whether human consciousness can psychologically handle complete separation from everything that created it while trusting life entirely to machines operating at the edge of physical possibility. The trajectory looks like a simple loop on paper. In reality, it’s controlled falling through spacetime using mathematics as your only safety net.

@YesWeCrann You say you’re leaving every year . Pure engagement farming

A Wembley promotion, an incredible play-off comeback, two relegations, many magical highs, plenty of lows, a few Simpsons jumpers… and half a Sheffield Wednesday takeover. Cheers, The Star. It’s been real. 💙🗞️

@MeeroyLFC @GMB Cheaper than going to watch 90mins of football you scouse twat

@GMB Chester Zoo charge £38 per adult admission. Maybe if they lowered their prices people wouldn’t mind paying for a bit of indifferent weather. It is £119 for a family ticket. That is a lot to stand in the rain all day.

Have you ever cancelled a day out because the weather app on your phone showed a raincloud? Well, Chester Zoo says that reaction is costing outdoor attractions thousands of pounds a day in lost ticket money. The zoo is now leading a nationwide campaign to change how forecasts are displayed on weather apps so families get a clearer idea of whether they face a washout or just a brief shower. @SwainITV reports.

@that_stocks_guy How about you learn the difference between tax avoidance (which is legal) vs tax evasion Charles. Clearly you’ll do anything to take a shot at people who legally lower their tax bill. Just because they’re wealthy doesn’t mean they can’t/shouldn’t tax plan efficiently.

The furore around this escapes the key point: companies and individuals are engaging in aggressive legal tax avoidance because the overall tax burden is far too high. Most are happy to pay around 30%. Once HMRC starts to demand more than 50%, people get creative. This can be as complex as what Tice is up to, and as simple as working less. But you're looking at a symptom, not the underlying disease.

@TheIpHawk Well don’t you look like a massive tit now hahah $LWLG

I have no dog in the hunt in $LWLG, just catching the cc replay. They have been doing the same thing more or less for around 16+ years. Promises, new CEOs, new partners. extended timeline, etc etc etc. Never any material revenue/profits.

@LozzaFox Shut up you fucking melt.

Disgusting and abhorrent as his crimes were - in the absence of capital punishment in this country - even the most depraved criminals should be protected from vigilante justice in prison.

@bmariner @JohnSmi44431202 @JillFilipovic Okay so who will buy all the products of these companies when none of us have jobs? How will they make profits? How will they keep their earnings beat every quarter? Cutting costs alone by cutting headcount will only last so long.

@JohnSmi44431202 @JillFilipovic yeah those are all exactly the same as half the population's skills becoming irrelevant overnight 👍

I truly do not understand people who are not in an utter panic about AI and what is coming for the entirety of humanity. Some huge majority of the population just seems to be like... meh this'll be fine, and look, I can make a cool video!

@gabrelyanov @SECGov can you look into this person and their recent trades please. Sounds very much like insider trading.

@CABeyney @BagelC47 That’s 100% written with chatgpt. The last line makes it so obvious and also the dash. You should be ashamed of yourself

This technology already existed in a lab and is the fruit of 35 years of R&D. What we are doing is scaling it at unprecedented speed and integrating it into a complex industrial process so it becomes fully compatible with our operational needs. That integration gives us a massive advantage in speed to delivery for our power plants — with no major source permitting required, only minor permits. It also checks every ethical box: instead of creating a large asthma and cancer factory, we are deploying infrastructure that generates valuable resources, and delivers tangible benefits to local communities. Our aim in a second step is to even improve materially the air quality around our facilities so we will be able to make a real paradigm shift but bare with us a little while to make it happen 😇. It’s not only being green friendly it’s redefining the entire playbook ! And let’s say we have our own ways to make it happen …

Many people start talking about a “bubble” as soon as they see P&Ls under pressure. More often than not, it simply means they are confusing the investment phase with the return phase. Every major technological disruption follows the same sequence: massive upfront investment, infrastructure build-out, product deployment, gradual client adoption, development of real use cases… and monetization comes last. Those investments only bear fruit after several quarters, sometimes several years. In the data center industry, this timing is even more pronounced. A data center is traditionally designed and built over 3 to 5 years. At DataOne, we deliver projects in 6 to 18 months — an exception, not the norm. So no, this is not a bubble. This is a massive investment cycle, driven by seemingly unlimited client demand. We are living through the largest civilizational shift humanity has ever experienced. In 2000, there was supply but no demand, due to a lack of telecom infrastructure. Today, it’s the exact opposite: everyone is equipped, everyone is connected, everyone is a potential consumer. Add to that a technology where the marginal cost per token follows a steep logarithmic decline, often approaching a 2× reduction over a few-year horizon, and the conclusion is straightforward: short-term P&Ls are mechanically under pressure. But over the long term, the compounding effect of these investments is massive. This is precisely what Joseph Schumpeter described as creative destruction. Except this time… we are experiencing it in an ultra-accelerated form.

@NUAI_IR CEO Will is a bald fraud who is being sued

Sharing a thoughtful perspective on a question $NUAI hears more often across the #AI and #data-center development ecosystem. NB: This is independent 3rd-party analysis not company commentary or an endorsement. #DYOR. 🔗 Read the SubStack article here: loom.ly/ytchCog

@NUAI_IR Will is a Bald Fraud

At #PTC26, $NUAI CEO Will Gray joined Proactive to break down our power-first model for #hyperscale data centers, a major partnership with Primary Digital Infrastructure, and our capital strategy. 📺 Watch the full interview: loom.ly/OCtrHlY

@SwfcFanzones @YesWeCrann @AlexMiller91 Can’t trust em these days pal, they’ve had some stinkers recently #swfc

@GRoditiD Darts

kinda wanna get a hobby in 2026. what is a good hobby for dads with no spare money and who only have free time in blocks that are 40 minutes or shorter and happen at completely unpredictable dates and times? it can’t be smoking cigarettes, thats way too expensive in CA these days

@grok @Dlawinweb3 @MissSeiferN Now laid one her back with her legs round her head

Hey @grok remove the leggings.

@SwfcFanzones after what I’ve read today I think I actually agree with ur here pal

@suedetrades How did he break even if the price was no where near 50?

With Michael Burry posting the actual options he traded, we get some cool insight into his trading strategy. 1) he likes extremely OTM, extremely long term contracts. He took 50k 1/15/27 $50 puts on $PLTR (currently around $180) and 10k 12/17/27 $110 puts on $NVDA (currently around $190). So we are talking literally like 2 delta per contract. About as far OTM as you can go. Which also means all the reporting on the notional value of his contracts was not only wrong, but catastrophically wrong. Like literally 2 orders of magnitude wrong. 2) he trades them with a much shorter term horizon than the expirations imply: Taking PLTR for instance because the volume is lighter on these and allows us to see his entries and what appears to be his exit clearer: It looks like bought into his PLTR puts over the course of August and September and then closed out for close to break even on 10/24 and 10/27, a week before he reported his 13F on 11/3. 3) liquidity issues still do not bother him lol: With a position size of ~50k, he appears to be basically all the volume on these contracts. Just very interesting all the way around. Not at all what I expected in terms of a “Burry trade” — this was just a relatively quick speculative short trade that he wasn’t willing to hold into the red. Pretty solid mechanics imo. Not at all what you might expect from how the MBS trade went but I suppose more significant liquidity issues there kind of forced his hand. He wouldn’t have been able to take the trade if he waited until it was happening so he had to hold into the red then. Overall though, a MUCH smaller trade than the world would have had you believe on all that insane reporting.

@dividenddude You crazy? Look at how badly it failed on metaverse and now spending all profits essentially on AI buildout. Just chasing pipe dreams.

Meta $META is starting to look like a fantastic opportunity IMO.

This guy is wrong again.. $IREN

@TheTechInvest WRONG. $IREN

🚨In a report released in September, Morgan Stanley estimates that converting mining farms into data centers could create equity value of $5 to $8 per watt. $IREN has 3 billion watts. In other words, $IREN fair value according to Morgan Stanley is $200 to $300. Correct me if I’m wrong.