Nash
3.5K posts
israel defenders keep writing this exact same article every other week and it goes no where but someone's still invested in churning these out.
USA TODAY@USATODAY
Opinion: Democrats and the legacy media are right to call out Nick Fuentes. He deserves it. But that’s no excuse to ignore a very real extremist on the left. usatoday.com/story/opinion/…
English
@lost_nomad__ The strongest countries always have more men than women. Under One Child Policy, China killed all female babies, and now they're approaching superpower status. Europe was greatly weakened and lost control of the world due to losing too many men in wars.
English
There are a LOT of negative effects from having too many men vs women. The times and places where women outnumbered men are seen as pretty enjoyable
Brooklyn, the Post-War eras. Meanwhile the reverse is brutal & depressing - San Fran, the Wild West
English
Of course, I don’t approve of this negativity toward men. It’s repulsive
But the effect of having a gender skew toward female might be positive. Is there a reason to believe we wouldn’t all be happier with, say, 55% women and 45% men?
staysaasy@staysaasy
I hear people say this and it is so sad man. Smart people say stuff like “oh I’d never want a boy. I have to teach them to not be a violent predator.” This framing is fundamentally antagonistic to half the population and a huge problem in society.
English
@lost_nomad__ I don't think a society can survive with only 45% men. We still need hard labor, soldiers, and smart people until we get AI and robotics going strong.
English
@GeneralFoxxxy ok, how about you ask your door dash deliverer to remove your balls instead of a surgeon, freak. 🤣
English
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Why is it not good faith? If I know it's a tie and I'm the deciding vote, I will pick Blue. If I know everyone has picked Red and I'm the last vote, I will pick Red. Everything else is guesswork, no option is selfish or selfless.
English
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud But it looks like blue is going to win right now and you’re not budging
If it’s even >45% blue people should be campaigning for it
If you don’t vote blue now you never will and that just means you’re not approaching this in good faith
English
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Exactly, you gotta pick Red when it looks like Red's gonna win. That's why it's not antisocial to pick Red. Hope this helps.
English
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud If I knew I couldn’t convince over half I might have to change my approach. But I have an 18mo son. I’m doing everything I can to make sure he’s OK. The most likely outcome in which I save him is blue.
You don’t get to change the phrasing in accordance with your preferred button
English
@TBYSTweet idk but libtards are very desperate to justify violence, murder, theft, etc. lately.
English
This has to be the worst trope in media.
"No Vash the Stampede! Don't kill the guy who was torturing and experimenting on children! He was really sad and lonely so what he did was ok."
I hate these stories.
English
@hell_line0 Well, giving women rights only managed to kill the birth rates to the point that the human race is collapsing, so now they have to be reversed as an existential matter.
English
2022: “Stop overreacting, they won’t overturn Roe.”
They did.
2023: “Stop overreacting, they won’t let women die rather than get an abortion.”
They did.
2024: “Stop overreacting, they won’t arrest women for miscarriages.”
They did.
2025: “Stop overreacting, they won’t turn women into incubators.”
They did.
2026: “Stop overreacting, they won’t attack mifepristone.”
They did, today.
Now: “Stop overreacting, they won’t go after birth control next.”
They will.
English
@LilithLovett The human body already does its own gene editing, it's far more advanced than we are, presently. In fact, to edit the genes, we have to first disable all the gene repair systems the body has to restore itself.
English
I don't care if some people will cry "eugenics" but we should figure out gene editing so nobody will ever have to suffer through something like this.
The human body is a flawed, broken machine, and it needs to be fixed.
Gusholder Haber Bülteni@gusholderhaber
Kemik içerisine yayılmış, doktorların “Güneş patlaması etkisi” dediği kemik tümörü.
English
@micah_erfan You're obfuscating the true issue, which is you systemically targeting White people with your psychotic genocidal rage.
English
Never forget that an immigrant woman was killed by an American citizen in a red state.
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee
Never forget Ever
English
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud No, I'm not. If it's worded in a way that makes Blue sound bad, Blue loses. That's the reality. Will you continue to press Blue, knowing it will kill you because NPCs won't consistently press Blue?
English
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud You’re just saying a bunch of words
Poll and poll again blue is winning. There is a decent level of trust in society. You break it by selecting red. That is antisocial.
It’s like you’re implying a realtiy where you have to vote red, but you’re still in the minority.
English
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Hence why it isn't antisocial to pick Red. Sometimes it's just the better answer, you just have to weigh how likely everyone is to pick Red or Blue based on their NPC minds being manipulated by emotional language.
English
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Games of estimates and risks can have better and worse answers
People might behave emotionally, but we have that knowledge. We don’t have to blanket emotion as random output, because it isn’t
English
@Atomsmade I do think abortion needs to be pushed on non-Whites since they are breeding out of control and not taking care of their children.
English
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud I am proving everything. The wording will change the result. Therefore, the vote is based on emotional interpretation of the words, or expectation of how the wording will manipulate others, and there's no "right" answer, it's merely a game of estimates and risk.
English
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud This is true for any issue, you’re proving exactly nothing
Also, having emotional or irrational responses to things is fine and expected
English
@discordspies The fact that the wording shifts a lot of votes one way or the other shows that many people are emotionally manipulated and aren't viewing it as a logic puzzle.
English
This is actually a good analogy and thinking they're pressing this red button is 99% of conservative politics.
Jason Boone@shadowe_wolfe
@TheCartoonLoon That's not even close to accurate.
English
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Not at all. Your framing would influence people to change their vote, even though it's the same scenario. This works both ways, convincing people to choose Red more or Blue more. That reveals that many people don't have a real principal, it's an emotional reaction to framing.
English
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Oh well then it is my opinion that the framing is ”everyone has to get off of the train tracks and everyone who doesn’t gets ran over, unless >50% agree to stay, then nothing happens.”
You see how silly and pointless this is?
English
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud No, the scenario is the same. 50%+ Blue saves everyone who jumped into the blender. The wording emotionally manipulates people into thinking jumping into the blender is worse than pressing a button. You should be able to identify it as the same scenario.
English
@NashForge @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Yeah but the scenario wasn’t a giant blender, it was two buttons. ”Look, if we change the scenario the outcome changes” isn’t some own
There are babies and retards in this world. I don’t think they deserve to die. Especially not when we can prevent it at only 50,01% blue.
English
@VikingMelon @yoursunnyescape @ChadNotChud Not true. When the question is explained as Blue jumping into a blender, and if enough people jump in the blender jams and doesn't kill everyone who jumped in, Red wins, even though it's the exact same scenario. The wording matters. But that isn't logical.
English
@yoursunnyescape @NashForge @ChadNotChud Blue has won every single poll, but I guess your antisocial behavior is unsurprising
English
@campaignist1 @ChadNotChud That's not what the meme says. It says it's only because of the 5-yr-old. But we could address that issue by having the kids' guardian pick for them. Where does that leave us? At what point is there insufficient reason to pick Blue?
English
@NashForge @ChadNotChud I mean…yes? Protecting the kids is one of many reasons I picked blue but not the only reason.
English