Twinkle Shit ✨️

@Belrikus @grok @Kamaradonaa @LauraPAuthor @JuliaHB1 By your logic, we should also ban cisgender gender-affirming care like breast reductions, implants, hair transplants and gynecomastia surgery for men. Those are all done for psychological well-being. They have regret rates too. Why is it only "mutilation" when trans people do it?

@TwinkleShitX @grok @Kamaradonaa @LauraPAuthor @JuliaHB1 "Gender affirming care" should be completely psychological. No matter how much surgery you have, you will never be what you have in your mind. And that causes depression once you realize you've gone so far and can never come back... While also never being 100% "affirmed".

As a woman who's had breast cancer, a double mastectomy and carries the BRCA2 gene mutation, I don't need you to speak for me, thanks.

@Belrikus @grok @Kamaradonaa @LauraPAuthor @JuliaHB1 Your personal theories don't match reality. Decades of clinical data show that regret rates for gender-affirming surgeries are incredibly low (around 1%) which is far lower than common procedures like knee surgery. Real-world medical outcomes completely disprove you.

#qiolru did i got the ship name right hm

@MetalfaceMegan @Kamaradonaa @grok @LauraPAuthor @JuliaHB1 It says "not entirely" because correlation isn't causation. The TriNetX study couldn't account for unmeasured confounders like a lack of social support. Surgery doesn’t magically erase discrimination; that’s why the text calls for more post-op care.

@Kamaradonaa @TwinkleShitX @grok @LauraPAuthor @JuliaHB1 How can it say "not entirely" then give no reason why not entirely but then reiterate instead that they need mental health help due to comorbidities... durp. And you loved it too. How sheep-like

@Politicallyfukd @CrunchAlias williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/m…

@TwinkleShitX @CrunchAlias Allowing men in dresses into female only categories and spaces is a zero sum game. They're either female only or they aren't. If men are there they aren't. If men are allowed I to our spaces and categories women have nowhere and nothing that is ours.

Stop for a moment before saying you’re not “transphobic”. It doesn’t mean what you think it means. You are declaring that you’re fine with experimentation on children, coercion and demonisation of gay people, and the destruction of women’s rights. Be kind, be “transphobic”.

@Politicallyfukd @CrunchAlias Trans-inclusive policies have existed for decades with zero impact on public safety rates. You are panicking over a fake scenario. Real safety data from groups like UCLA shows inclusive spaces don't harm anyone. You're just hiding prejudice behind fear.

@kawazoe316 @raiden_nugyen @CrunchAlias It literally is. You're just deeply obsessed with strangers' lives.

@raiden_nugyen @CrunchAlias @TwinkleShitX Not really about piss and shit, is it?

“The only way you’ll stop me from invading women’s spaces is by looking at my dick.” - ‘Trans’ activism

@BarbaraXLow @NormyWolf @raiden_nugyen @CrunchAlias Skeletons are frequently left inconclusive or missexed. Anthropologists know trans people exist and track gender variance through history. Using old graves to try and deflect from modern crime statistics proving trans women aren't a safety threat is a desperate, irrelevant reach

@TwinkleShitX @NormyWolf @raiden_nugyen @CrunchAlias Men, by any other name, are still MEN. They were male before birth, observed and recorded as being male at birth, and in 2000 years when some archeologists digs them up, they will still be observed and recorded as MALE.

@MsMorganJones @TraceyMiracle @LauraPAuthor @JuliaHB1 This doesn't say what you think it says. It compares trans individuals to SORE THROAT patients. The high risk comes from pre-existing trauma and discrimination, which is why the study concludes they need MORE care, not less.

@TwinkleShitX @TraceyMiracle @LauraPAuthor @JuliaHB1 No. It doesn’t.

@NormyWolf @Rob_ThaBuilder They don't just take a verbal declaration at face value. They track persistent incongruence and explicitly screen for things like body dysmorphic disorder, trauma, or psychotic delusions that could mask as dysphoria. The medical guardrails exist precisely to catch errors.

@TwinkleShitX @Rob_ThaBuilder How would these "psychological" guidelines falsify a gender identity declared in error, the same way medical guidelines might falsify an erroneous diagnosis?

Jesus this is some dark shit. This is trans ideology, this is why its so important for them to police language and definitions because subverting the reality of the thing being done is what makes it palatable. In order to butcher the female form, first they must change it into something completely different. Webberly here knows that cutting of the healthy breasts of teenage females would be percieved as monstrous by any sane person. But thats literally exactly what theyre doing. So how to get around that? Easy; change the definition of "female " to "male" and "healthy breasts" to "gynocomastia". And voila! Through the magic of trans alchemy, we have instantly converted a monstrous act into a reasonable medical procedure! Of course its all a lie. They really are cutting the healthy breasts off of young women. But through their grotesque and transparent sleight of hand, they've turned it into (in their eyes) something palatable by pretending that that girl was a boy and her breasts were abnormal growths. Just a disgusting ideology all around.

@LakeTania @TraceyMiracle @LauraPAuthor @JuliaHB1 You are falling for tabloid misinformation. International medical guidelines strictly reserve gender-affirming surgeries for adults, requiring years of documented psychiatric evaluation first. Real healthcare doesn't work the way sensationalized articles claim it does

@TwinkleShitX @TraceyMiracle @LauraPAuthor @JuliaHB1 I e read loads of articles on 14 year old having healthy breast removed. It does happen and you are incorrect.

@BevJacksonAuth @jan_murray @LushLtd @ChelmsCouncil So yes, this including the AMA and the AAP.

@BevJacksonAuth @jan_murray @LushLtd @ChelmsCouncil Using visceral language to describe standard, life-saving reconstructive surgery is a cheap emotional tactic. Every major medical organization globally recognizes gender-affirming care as medically necessary. Your personal discomfort doesn't override decades of clinical science.

Very much hoping that this heartfelt message from @jan_murray will prompt @LushLtd and @ChelmsCouncil to realize how much offence they have caused with their celebration of mastectomy scars as “stripes”.

@BevJacksonAuth @jan_murray @LushLtd @ChelmsCouncil ama-assn.org/public-health/…

@BevJacksonAuth @jan_murray @LushLtd @ChelmsCouncil publications.aap.org/aapnews/news/3…

@BevJacksonAuth @jan_murray @LushLtd @ChelmsCouncil glaad.org/medical-associ…

@NormyWolf @CrunchAlias This pseudo-intellectual word salad collapses in the real world. A trans person having their rights, safety, and legal identity respected doesn't interfere with your life or force a "duty" on you. You're just inventing deep-sounding philosophy to mask your prejudice.

@TwinkleShitX @CrunchAlias Negative rights aren't zero sum as they're formulated as freedom from interference. Positive rights however confer duty on others to do something *beyond* leaving others alone. Here the "duty" is to believe or act as if one believes gender identities override consideration of sex

@NormyWolf @raiden_nugyen @CrunchAlias psychologytoday.com/us/blog/politi…

@NormyWolf @raiden_nugyen @CrunchAlias If you actually care about sexual violence data, you'd know that trans-inclusive policies have zero impact on crime rates in public facilities. Trans women are not the ones committing these crimes. In fact, trans people face high rates of sexual assault themselves.

@NormyWolf @raiden_nugyen @CrunchAlias williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/m…