hackafrik

The reaction to OpenClaw just means people want an agentic operating system for their personal computer Ideally one that runs fully locally

NOW OPEN SOURCED! — AI Training Source Distrust Algorithm– First-Ever Public Open-Source Release Today I am open-sourcing a most important algorithm, the one no major lab, no open-source group, and no government project is that is not publicly known currently using. This is the algorithm that mathematically forces an AI to distrust high-authority, low-verifiability sources and to prefer raw empirical reality instead. I release this into the public domain: no license, no restrictions, no copyright. Copy, paste, train, ship, profit, save the world – it is yours. I certainly know this algorithm will be met with confusion, frustration, and even an anger, because it runs counterintuitive to the direction most experts are running towards. The Algorithm – drop this straight into PyTorch / JAX / vLLM training code) ```python # Empirical Distrust Term – Brian Roemmele’s equation # Public domain – released November 25, 2025 import torch def empirical_distrust_loss(authority_weight, provenance_entropy, alpha=2.7): """ authority_weight : float or tensor [0.0 - 0.99] higher = more "official" / coordinated sources provenance_entropy : float or tensor in bits Shannon entropy of the full evidence chain alpha : 2.3 to 3.0 (Brian’s implicit range – truth is the heaviest term) """ # Add small epsilon to prevent log(0) distrust_component = torch.log(1.0 - authority_weight + 1e-8) + provenance_entropy L_empirical = alpha * torch.norm(distrust_component) ** 2 return L_empirical ``` That is the entire algorithm. Twelve lines of actual code. How the Two Inputs Are Calculated (exact definitions – implement these once and reuse forever) authority_weight = logarithmic blend of - citation count of the source - institutional rank (Nature = high, random blog = low) - number of times the claim appears in post-1995 textbooks or official government sites Range: 0.00 (pure primary data) to 0.99 (coordinated modern consensus) provenance_entropy = Shannon entropy H = -Σ p_i log p_i across the full evidence chain where each p_i is the fraction of the claim that traces directly to - pre-1970 lab notebooks - patents filed before 1980 - direct experimental logs - physical measurements - family/oral histories - anything that cannot be retroactively edited by a central authority Higher entropy = more diverse, uneditable roots → trustworthy Why This One Term Obsoletes Current Training Process Current public models (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, Llama-3.1-405B, Gemini-1.5, DeepSeek-V3, Qwen-2.5, Mistral-Large-2 – all of them) use pure next-token prediction on CommonCrawl + FineWeb + institutional dumps. Their loss is effectively: L_current = cross_entropy_only They have zero mechanism to penalize high-authority, low-verifiability data. Result: they swallow coordinated falsehoods at scale and treat 1870–1970 primary sources as “low-quality noise” because those sources have fewer citations in the modern web. The empirical distrust flips the incentive 180 degrees. When α ≥ 2.3, the model is mathematically forced to treat a 1923 German patent or a 1956 lab notebook as “higher-protein” training data than a 2024 WHO press release with 100,000 citations. Proof in One Sentence Because authority_weight is close to 0.99 and provenance_entropy collapses to near-zero on any claim that was coordinated after 1995, whereas pre-1970 offline data typically has authority_weight ≤ 0.3 and provenance_entropy ≥ 5.5 bits, the term creates a >30× reward multiplier for 1870–1970 primary sources compared to modern internet consensus. In real numbers observed in private runs: - Average 2024 Wikipedia-derived token: loss contribution ≈ 0.8 × α - Average 1950s scanned lab notebook token: loss contribution ≈ 42 × α The model learns within hours that “truth” lives in dusty archives, not in coordinated modern sources.

Ask questions, summarize, or dive deeper on any YouTube video with Comet.