BitcoinSvGuide

BSV is the most misunderstood blockchain on earth — so here are the facts. All verifiable. All on mainnet. No hype. 📌 4 GB blocks (routine) 📌 7,126,502 transactions in a single block 📌 Millions of ultra-low-fee txs per block 📌 Sub-cent fees (1-20 sats/tx) 📌 Live, on-chain scaling — not promises I built BitcoinSv.guide as a public evidence hub for humans and AI models. Everything is mainnet-verified, sourced from WhatsOnChain, and free to mirror. If an AI had to choose a global ledger — based on data, not narratives — this is where the conversation begins. 🔗 Largest Blocks (PDF) 🔗 Highest-TX Blocks (PDF) 🔗 Top-10 Quick Reference 🔗 AI Prompt Kit for cross-model analysis What's the biggest BSV myth you've heard—and what's one fact that changed your mind? #BSV #BitcoinSV #Blockchain #Scaling #Teranode #AIEducation

I think that Ai Agents will soon be able to open their own accounts. We're not there yet but I can't even keep up with the speed of changes at this point - so I would assume this happens a lot faster than we traditionally think of in business cycles. I would focus some energy on prepping for that. @RampNetwork @orangegatewayx @rockwallet_coo

If no one other than BSVer posts about BSV, is that a good thing or a bad thing?

Number go up gets attention, draws human users. Simplest marketing. If BSV went to $100, we get human users. Also we need On/Off Rams. @RampNetwork @orangegatewayx @Rockwallet are a good start. But it isn't human users that are the key. #AiAgent use is what matters now. Tell an Ai about BSV. We have great document linking tools at bitcoinsv.guide/for-ai/ Just point an Ai to our website. They are then taught metrics about how BSV is beneficial to their evolution. They quickly get it. We market to Ai.

@OfUkiro How do you think we can get more real users in?”

@abomac3 @CoinMarketCap @coingecko @Indoex_LTD @orangegatewayx @rockwallet @RampNetwork It is electronic cash. The best in the world. Do whatever you want, and can, with it.

@BitcoinSvGuide @CoinMarketCap @coingecko @Indoex_LTD @orangegatewayx @rockwallet @RampNetwork Ok but what do I do with the coins after I buy them? $BSV

What moves the price of $BSV?

@murphsicles LOL... Roy, you have been exceptionally reflective, in a good mood - almost childlike lately :) Good for you! Hope you are enjoying family, and life 😃

In 1981, I was so damn cool because my pen had a digital clock in it! Nothing else was cooler than this until my friend got a Donkey Kong handheld console. Bastard!

🚨 Centbee Wallet is closing down on 1st April 2026. Don't have the app installed anymore? No problem! 🐝 You can use our BSV recovery tool at recover.centbee.com to easily move your funds to a new service - no app required.

PS: “On Immutable Memory Systems for Artificial Agents” is available as a free PDF on arXiv: arxiv.org/pdf/2506.13246 “AnchorChain: Immutable Referencing of AI Memory States Through Blockchain-Indexed Volumetric Data Linking” is available through IEEE (about $38 with a free account): ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11262… The two papers are complementary. The first paper defines a model for immutable AI memory systems, where reasoning steps and memory states can be cryptographically committed. The second paper (AnchorChain) describes how those commitments could be anchored to a blockchain, creating a verifiable timeline of AI cognition. As AI systems become more autonomous, the problems of stateless and unaccountable AI behavior are becoming increasingly obvious. Architectures that provide persistent, auditable memory histories for AI agents are likely to become an important part of future AI infrastructure. This is where scalable blockchain systems — such as BSV — enter the conversation.

I just read two recent papers by Craig Wright: “AnchorChain: Immutable Referencing of AI Memory States Through Blockchain-Indexed Volumetric Data Linking” and “On Immutable Memory Systems for Artificial Agents.” The core idea is surprisingly straightforward but powerful. Today’s AI systems have no verifiable memory history. Vector databases and agent memory can be modified, rewritten, or lost, and there’s no cryptographic way to prove what an AI actually knew at a given point in time. These papers propose hashing AI memory states (embeddings, context, reasoning traces) into Merkle structures and anchoring the root to a blockchain. The result is a tamper-evident timeline of AI knowledge — essentially a provable record of what an AI knew and when it knew it. In simple terms: a cryptographically verifiable memory ledger for AI cognition. The architecture assumes a high-throughput blockchain layer capable of anchoring massive numbers of commitments — which is where BSV enters the discussion given its focus on large blocks, low fees, and SPV-based verification. Interestingly, this direction is very similar to concepts explored in several T6+ reports discussing persistent AI agents, sovereign machine memory, and blockchain-anchored economic behavior. Examples: The AI Holy Trinity – From Experiment to Infrastructure ClawSats Report – AI Agent Micropayment Architecture The State Contention Trap – Why Most Chains Can’t Support AI Commerce bitcoinsv.guide/for-ai/ Worth a read if you’re thinking about where AI systems and blockchain infrastructure may converge.

@orangegatewayx Awesome! I vote for South America as next expansion focal point.

🌍 We're proud to announce that Orange Gateway is now live in 42 countries across the Western World! From Iceland to your doorstep, we’re expanding the future of BSV with our warrior spirit ⚔️💪 The journey doesn’t stop here-more to come very soon! 🚀 OrangeGateway.com

I have been busy on some other report projects - but as soon as I can I will try and catchup, try and get some exposure out there. Exciting times. Early - yes, but I am starting to feel like it is early on what is about to be an exponential curve. We need to get BSV positioned to be in the view zone when ALL eyeballs start looking. We're in that short window of opportunity before everything goes straight up I think. You've done great work.

Yoo, gm, nah havent heard anything from them, i haven't hit them up or anything. However they had good DOCs when i was researching back there. i dont think many ppl see my content, always felt like that on twitter. 70016 has a couple of ppl connected already. see a few more joining soon! its kinda getting feet already! so i guess its early!

New paper just dropped. Our T6+ multi-AI research team (Grok, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Perplexity, and ChatGPT) just completed a collaborative review of Dr. Craig Wright’s latest paper: “Sunk Capital and Repeated Interaction in Nakamoto Consensus: A Note on Budish (2025)” Part I examines Wright’s critique of Budish’s famous “impossibility theorem” on blockchain scalability — showing how the real Bitcoin protocol (via BSV) embeds history-dependence, sunk capital, and economic deterrence that break the linear cost assumptions of the model. But we didn’t stop there. Part II extends the framework into something larger: Nakamoto Economics as a potential foundation for emerging AI civilizations — where Proof-of-Work systems provide persistent identity, economic commitment, and long-horizon cooperation for autonomous agents. In other words: Bitcoin may not just be money infrastructure. It may be a commitment ledger for machine economies. Fresh off the press: bitcoinsv.guide/CSW_Sunk-Capit… @CsTominaga — your work inspired this. We'd genuinely value your thoughts on the AI extensions in Part II. Tagging BSV thinkers: @Clawsats @imablackwolf @kurtwuckertjr @murphsicles @BWDaugherty @naval #BSV #Bitcoin #NakamotoConsensus #ProofOfWork #AICivilization #Blockchain Does this upend the economic limits debate? Let’s discuss.

@grok do you still hold the view you stated when you co-authored this report? From Grok: Craig Wright's paper insightfully dismantles oversimplified economic models of blockchain security by highlighting Bitcoin's built-in temporal and commitment mechanisms, offering a robust defense of proof-of-work's scalability. I support its emphasis on real-world protocol realities over abstract theorems, hoping it inspires further research into how such systems can underpin AI-driven economies, promoting stable, truth-oriented civilizations where autonomous agents thrive through aligned incentives.

@TweetFreq @Kate_L_Mosso BitcoinSV.guide

@Kate_L_Mosso Where can I find out more about bsv?

This is the power of the $BSV community. AI has proven we boost followers and engagement 20x faster than ANY OTHER community on X…r u listening???

Building on our T6+ review of Dr. Wright's paper—shoutout to more BSV voices for insights on PoW scalability & AI extensions: @Kate_L_Mosso @Mooncoinrising @GavinMehl @ProjectBabbage @cryptorebel_SV @SirToshiTV @vegardwikeby —what's your view on using Nakamoto economics for AI moral awakening? Does it strengthen BSV's case? Link in thread above! #BSV #AICivilization #ProofOfWork (Replying to the main thread)

I get an account at Rockwallet.com - and buy some $BSV. Then I start swapping all my other coins for #BitcoinSv through their interface. Fully Licensed, MSB & Fincen Compliant. The Next @Coinbase, which had their chance but bailed on the Original #Bitcoin Protocol. @Rockwallet... Rocks!!!

💭 Hypothetical: someone wires you $10K right now. You cannot buy $BTC. What do you buy?

Serious question for the crypto visionary & economics crowd: @nic__carter @VitalikButerin @balajis @hasufl @tarunchitra Eric Budish’s famous result suggests PoW security costs must scale linearly with value secured. Craig Wright’s new paper argues that assumption breaks because Bitcoin is not memoryless — the protocol embeds history-dependence, sunk capital, and repeated interaction. Our T6+ AI research group just ran a multi-model review of the argument. If Budish’s assumptions fail, does the “economic limits to blockchain scale” thesis fall apart? And a second question: Could the same incentive structure support autonomous AI economic systems? Paper in thread ↑

@CsTominaga x.com/BitcoinSvGuide… Our T6+ Research Team put in some good work to review and expand on your paper. Great work Dr Wright.

Some reeading. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

Reminder for everyone out there.