@PhysInHistory Time is a Law, and time, whatever it is, acts as the kernel. 😎
English
Charlie
9.9K posts
Charlie
@Charlie157874
Christian. Just another fellow Time traveler. No DMs, delete and block. Happily married 30 plus years.
Bergabung Şubat 2025
853 Mengikuti366 Pengikut
@RichUniverse_ But seriously, I think we are going to see larger dumps of this sort of thing after Gabbard.
English
@RichUniverse_ The real focus is on the Laws that are written before the first anything happened. And how those laws are rendered to what we call science. You appear to have opened an old box your mind had laying around in the attic.
Enjoy it. Some Allman Brothers Band (here). 😎
English
I wasn’t going to post this but I can’t stop thinking about it.
DARPA just quietly published a funding solicitation in December that I think almost nobody outside of defense and biotech circles has read. I’ve spent the last few days going through it and honestly I’m still processing what I’m looking at.
They’re trying to build something they call a “nucleic acid compiler.”
A protein machine that lives inside your cells and writes DNA using nothing but light.
No injection. No viral vector. No physical delivery mechanism of any kind.
Just light.
Point a specific pattern of photons at a cell and the machine inside reads it like code and synthesizes whatever genetic sequence it was told to make.
They’re calling the information transfer “massless” because literally nothing physical moves between the programmer and the cell.
Just electromagnetic radiation carrying instructions that get translated directly into the language of life.
Every method we currently have for getting genetic information into a cell requires moving matter across a biological barrier.
A needle.
A lipid nanoparticle.
A modified virus. Something physical has to carry the message.
This eliminates that entirely.
It’s the difference between handing someone a letter and thinking a thought directly into their mind.
And here’s the part that sent me down a rabbit hole at 2am. If this works, if you can encode genetic instructions as light and decode them inside living cells, then you’ve just proven something about the nature of reality itself.
You’ve demonstrated that life is, at its most fundamental level, an information process.
That biology and computation are the same thing wearing different clothes.
John Wheeler spent his career arguing that physical reality emerges from information. “It from Bit” he called it.
The universe isn’t made of matter that happens to process information.
It IS information processing that happens to look like matter.
I don’t know whether to be amazed or terrified.
Probably both.
The document is public.
It’s called DARPA-PS-26-10.
Read it yourself and tell me I’m overreacting.
I don’t think I am.
everglade.com/wp-content/upl…
@Cortex_Zero @UAPReportingCnt @violetta_yc @wkpixley1 @BobMcGwier_N4HY
English
Reality does not pop up out of fields that are beneath reality.
The deeply flawed modern view of a particle is basically like playing with a plasma globe. When you poke the glass, the plasma excites around your finger and then there is a "particle" on the glass.
Reality is not separated from the universe by some barrier you cant see but you can interact with.
Reality is simple, it is 4D, and everything is made of energy, some of it traveling in a straight line, and some of it caught in closure.
English
When you fly away on holiday, get off the plane and feel 'Blimey its hot here!' you experience rapid climate change. It's a shock
But when you head home a fortnight later, you'll be quite used to it
You 'll have acclimatised to climate change. Even to 'heatwaves'
Latimer Alder@latimeralder
Let me introduce a new, very scary word to the Climatistas 'Acclimatise' It means 'getting used to a different climate' Humans are very good at it. Sleep easy
English
@sagacitysweets @PhysInHistory Science would be dead without philosophy leading the charge.
English
All due respect to Mr Azimov…
Science isn’t subjective and quite antithetical to subjectivism.
Science is indisputably a "state or fact of knowing; what is known, knowledge (of something) acquired by study; information;" also "assurance of knowledge, certitude, certainty,"
Does a glass hold water? The answer is literally science. Absolute.
Stop it. ;)
Happy hunting!
English
@Kekius_Sage Because we all think space is empty. That is the problem with dark stuff and placeholders. We must admit that space is not empty.
English
Nobel Prize physicist James Peebles says we must admit a hard truth: Dark matter and dark energy are just placeholders for our ignorance.
95% of the universe remains completely unknown to us.
English
This is what science should have been looking at all along, sadly the c students ran away with the AGW narrative and compelled their case forward. Now it appears that the actual science (the stuff that doesn't come with a lottery winning paycheck) can be conducted, one small victory at a time.
English
Not the solar core or radiative zone is where relevant solar oscillation periods need arise.
"Photons produced in the solar core take roughly 10,000 to 170,000 years (with some estimates up to 1 million years) to migrate through the radiation zone to the solar surface. This long journey is due to a "random walk" process where dense plasma particles, causing constant scattering and re-emission, prevent direct travel." An oscillation mode in the core would take many millennia to be seen even at the radiation one convective boundary, ie.e the tachocline then on to the photosphere.
The solar periodic resonances affecting Earth climate do not have to happen in the core, rather the convective layer and the tachocline are where the poloidal and toroidal magnetic field components are generated, amplified, twisted up and then released. This is the likely source of the 11 year and 22 year solar cycle.
Furthermore, magnetic flux tube rise velocity in the convective zone has been estimated via helioseismology to be on the order of 200 to 250 m/sec starting at the tachocline and slowing to near zero as flux tubes approach the photosphere. It is the surface twisting and eruption of cooler flux tubes that creates sun spots, with the magnetic energy bottled in those plasma laden field lines stretching upwards, breaking and reconnection events releasing vast amounts of magnetic energy as it hurls billions of tons of plasma it the coronasphere.
English
Tom Nelson Podcast #380: Robert Cutler: “A 3560-Year Jovian Solar and Climate Cycle” is now published. @RCutler34
Robert Cutler argues that climate patterns repeat about every 3,560 years (and 7,120), based on shifting proxy reconstructions—especially high‑resolution Greenland ice cores—and confirming with correlation analysis across Greenland cores, an Antarctic core, and lake sediment records from China and Alaska. He notes phase inversions possibly tied to ~2,400‑year Bray and Bond cycles and highlights alignments among events like the Younger Dryas, the 8.2 ka and 4.7 ka events, and the Dark Ages cold period. Cutler connects 3,560 to harmonics/subharmonics of Jovian-planet conjunction timing, the Jose cycle, and other periodicities (e.g., ~1,850 and ~890 years), suggesting strong non-subtle forcing possibly involving solar activity.
00:00 Meet Robert Cutler
27:27 Correlation Confirms 3560
31:05 Predictions and Next Steps
32:33 Where 3560 Comes From
34:04 Can Planets Modulate Sun
36:40 Solar Core Resonance Idea
40:39 Harmonics in Planet Orbits
41:56 Impulsive Conjunction Forces
43:44 JPL Data and Long Cycles
47:50 Grand Alignment Phase Markers
49:57 Jose Cycle and Barycenter
53:02 Hidden 890 Year Beat
57:14 Rapid Climate Event Timing
59:55 Harmonic Subharmonic Map
01:02:18 Summary and Open Questions
01:06:30 Reproducible Code and Tools
01:08:43 Next Steps and Wrap Up
English
That we can track. This is the problem with science, they assume they know everything as long as it leads to their conclusion.
Perhaps men have nothing to do with modern global warming? And a single volcanic eruption could lead to a nuclear winter. Then we would all know the cause of the warming that was eliminated in exchange for an ice age. If this is possible, then we need to reexamine the AGW thing.
The whole story makes sense until you include the Sun in the equation of AGW, but only CO2 is demonized. Does this sound like science or the desire for it to be CO2? Your claim that it is CO2 means people thriving kills the planet. But if you are wrong, and the Sun thinks you are wrong, then you are causing double the misery by maligning humans and the things we thrive on.
English
@Charlie157874 @HuppenthalJohn There are lots of features of planetary orbits and our movement through the galaxy which astronomers study, but they have nothing to do with modern human-induced warming.
English
Entertaining #clown @HuppenthalJohn says current global warming is nothing to do with humans but is in fact caused by
"oddities in orbits, and vibrations of our travel through the galaxy".
Sounds like a script for Star Trek.
Where's Captain Kirk ?
John Huppenthal@HuppenthalJohn
GPT: Comment on the following interaction: "human activity is driving rapid warming now." Hmmm...no. Our temperatures are determined by forces that have been in play for hundreds of years, if not thousands, and by enormously complex interactions among layers of the ocean, planets of the solar system, oddities in orbits, and vibrations of our travel through the galaxy. The statement raises a real issue, but it also mixes together factors that operate on very different timescales. A climate scientist would likely respond that: Yes, Earth's climate is influenced by many long-term forces. Changes in Earth's orbit (Milankovitch cycles) operate over roughly 20,000–100,000 years. Ocean circulation patterns influence climate over years to centuries. Solar variability affects climate. Volcanic activity, continental drift, and other geologic processes matter over long periods. The key question is not whether these forces exist, but whether they explain the warming observed since about 1970. Orbital cycles currently favor a very slight long-term cooling trend, not warming. Solar output has not increased enough over recent decades to explain the observed warming. Internal ocean oscillations (such as ENSO, PDO, and AMO) redistribute heat within the climate system and can temporarily accelerate or slow warming, but they do not provide a sustained source of additional energy to the Earth system. The mainstream scientific argument is therefore an attribution argument. It is not: "Climate is simple, and humans are the only influence."Rather: "Many influences affect climate, but the dominant explanation for the rapid warming observed over the last several decades is the increase in greenhouse gases from human activities."The strongest part of your statement is the reminder that the climate is an extraordinarily complex system. Scientists agree with that. The weaker part is the implication that because the climate is complex, human influence cannot be identified. Complexity cuts both ways. For example, a physician can recognize that smoking increases lung cancer risk even though human biology is vastly complex. Likewise, climate scientists attempt to separate the effects of solar changes, volcanic eruptions, ocean cycles, and greenhouse gases using multiple independent lines of evidence. There is also a philosophical difference embedded in the exchange: The statement "human activity is driving rapid warming now" is a claim about the dominant cause of the recent trend. Your response emphasizes that the climate is influenced by many causes across long periods of time. Those are not necessarily contradictory. A system can be governed by many natural influences over millennia while still having a dominant short-term forcing today. The scientific debate is therefore not whether orbital mechanics, ocean layers, solar variability, or other natural processes exist—they unquestionably do. The debate concerns their relative contributions to the warming observed over the last century, particularly since the mid-20th century. The prevailing assessment of organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration is that greenhouse gases from human activities are the primary driver of recent warming, while natural factors continue to contribute to shorter-term and regional variations. My comment: of course they do!!! Trillions in funding depend on the climate narrative. They aren't going to give that up easily!!!! If ever!!!!
English
Then it struck me! If you can somehow prove that "bigger" numbers are somehow equivalent to "smaller" numbers, you can prove any theorem which utilizes infinite processes.
English
@Deepcosmoss Space is a 3-phase quantum Crystal, It is electrical in nature and we are rendered in energy within the nodes of this crystal, in 3 working phases.
English
Sen hayatın boyunca uzayda pürüzsüzce hareket ettiğini sanıyorsun ama hiçbir zaman akıcı bir şekilde ilerlemedin.
Einstein bize uzay-zamanı kusursuz, esnek ve kesintisiz bir kumaş gibi anlattı. Gezegenler bu kumaşı büküyor, biz de o kıvrımlarda akıp gidiyoruz dedik. Yüzyıldır buna inandık. Ama kuantum fiziği o kumaşa mikroskopla çok yakından baktığında dehşet verici bir şey fark etti. Ortada bir kumaş falan yok. Sadece kesikli, birbirinden bağımsız pikseller var.
Şu an telefonunun ekranına uzaktan baktığında kusursuz bir bütün görüyorsun ama çok yaklaşırsan milyonlarca keskin kare görürsün. Evren de tam olarak böyle çalışıyor. Fizikçilerin uzay için belirlediği Planck uzunluğu diye bir sınır var. Bir santimetrenin trilyon kere trilyon kere trilyonda biri. İşte bu, evrenin fiziksel olarak maksimum çözünürlüğü.
Bir şey bu boyuttan daha küçük olamaz, uzay bu boyuttan daha fazla bölünemez. Yani elini havada salladığında elin boşlukta kesintisiz bir çizgi çizmiyor. Uzayın bir pikselinden diğerine anlık olarak ışınlanıyor. Tıpkı bir bilgisayar oyununda karakterin kare kare render edilmesi gibi. Evren kesintisiz akan bir nehir değil, kare hızı o kadar yüksek ki kusursuz sandığımız bir animasyon.
Ama kısım şu, biz o pürüzsüzlüğe o kadar inandık ki gerçekliğin duraklayarak ilerlediğini göremiyoruz. Belki de uzay sandığımız gibi devasa bir boşluk değil, algımızın sınırlarıyla oynayan devasa bir dijital ızgaradır. Simülasyonda bir bug bulduk galiba, gerçekliğin pikselleri bu kadar net görünmemeliydi.
Türkçe
@MatthewWielicki I recall reading that the moon orbit is losing about 3cm year. I wonder if climate change is due to some threshold in that distance? What would the world come to when we don't have tides anymore? What will that do to the climate?
English
@MatthewWielicki I also see that continents don't always drift either, sometimes they roll like big waves. 😃
English
Ice cores, marine sediments, and other proxy records show that Earth's climate has experienced abrupt temperature shifts far faster than anything observed over the instrumental period. The best-known examples are the Dansgaard–Oeschger (D-O) events during the last glacial period, where Greenland temperatures increased by 5–10°C within a decade.
The claim that "natural climate change always happens slowly over thousands of years" is demonstrably false. Earth's climate system contains powerful nonlinear feedbacks capable of producing rapid changes without human influence.
Whether modern warming has a human contribution is a separate discussion. But asserting that rapid climate shifts are unprecedented or that nature only operates on millennial timescales reflects a misunderstanding of the paleoclimate record.
Source: pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pn…
English
"If a theory explains everything, it explains nothing," - philosopher Karl Popper.
A theory capable of explaining any possible outcome lacks true explanatory power because it can't be tested or proven wrong (falsified), making it unscientific.
English
@RCutler34 @MatthewWielicki Tell me more? What are we looking at? Can we predict that some event takes place in each of these changes? Could there be larger cosmic causes that the galaxy experiences as a whole?
English
@MatthewWielicki These rapid changes are driven by the Sun. The associated periodicities continue throughout the Holocene.
For example the 8.2ka event follows the termination of the YD by 3560 years.
Also, over the Holocene climate largely repeats after 3560 years. Rapid cooling ahead?
English
@BobE3042 @MatthewWielicki You wouldn't think so if how those layers are laid down was better understood. Caution: some people find this material to be dangerous and offensive. And losing the geologic column in a single hour is traumatic. 😎
kolbecenter.org/category/video…
English
@MatthewWielicki I see abrupt climate changes in sedimentary rock deposits. They also show that there is a pattern to the changes.
English