Matter as Machine

59.7K posts

Matter as Machine banner
Matter as Machine

Matter as Machine

@matterasmachine

The True nature of reality has been discovered. In short: Everything is execution. Check out the 'Highlights' section for evidence and predictions.

Ukraine Katılım Mayıs 2021
90 Takip Edilen8.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
Here is how the universe works. Particles move through space according to the instructions they contain. When particles meet, they exchange instructions according to certain rules. Physics, the universe, and we ourselves emerge from those rules. See an example of the rules below.
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine

(1/11) The simple algorithm described below shows a direct connection between taxicab and Euclidean space. A discrete particle that can move only a fixed distance per tick, either along the x-axis or the y-axis, produces Euclidean cyclic motion at scale.

English
1
0
0
131
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
@skdh Particle masses are not fundamental instead. Edge stars have lower particle masses and are affected by gravity more.
English
0
0
0
24
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
@materion It was presented many times x.com/matterasmachin…
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine

What if every elementary particle is actually a cyclic machine? It can be tested through predictions and experiments. It could be the Next Huge Thing. Machine consists of a list of instructions. Each instruction represents some direction in space: left, right, up, down, forward, back. Machine executes all it's states one after another and moves in corresponding direction of space the same discrete distance on each tick of time. After some state is executed, control is passed to the next state. It happens infinitely in a loop. After last state is executed, control is passed to the first state. So machine moves and moves until it's state is changed. youtu.be/yXSO_N2tL-0 Properties and phenomena that this machine reproduces: - E - total energy: total amount of states. Energy of one state is numerically equal to reduced Planck’s constant and is the reason why action is discrete - inertia (First Newton's Law): Machine keeps on moving infinitely until it's state is updated and the more states in machine the more states to be updated and the more particle "resists to acceleration" youtu.be/sO9TgfWO5c4 - limited speed: you can not move faster than straight - discrete action (interaction): change in energy equals energy of one state - reduced wave length: contribution of one discrete piece in motion youtu.be/uaYC5s82iIE - uncertainty and observer effect: interaction destroys the original particle so you can't know some properties of the particle after interaction. Because you can't control, which state will be taken from machine or passed to machine youtu.be/mNjKbEcswI4 - momentum and conservation of momentum: amount of states that represents motion youtu.be/IG7Rfsu4fK4 - rest mass: amount of states that represents cyclic motion. For example a pair of states left-right does not move machine anywhere, but takes ticks of time to be executed. - speed: If you have particle RRRR, it moves with maximum possible speed right. If you have RRRRLLL, it moves right 1 moment of time out of 7. So it's average speed is 1/7 of the maximum speed - Photons generated by set of particles have more or less the same speed in any direction youtu.be/RVrPr4NvddU - Discrete rules lead to circular motion and "wave behaviour": youtu.be/neSpv3_I8rw and more. Bell inequalities say nothing about locality. They show that interaction destroys hidden variables, therefor hidden variables can not be "measured". youtu.be/OX_0poP6_tMA A way to test (a way to show that light can have rest mass and therefore can move slower than): youtu.be/qJ6c1xQI6D4 Free will is free, not fixed algorithm, spontaneous neural activity, slight schizophrenia that every human has.. youtu.be/0v-_oaJSwI0

English
1
0
0
7
Arjen Dijksman
Arjen Dijksman@materion·
@matterasmachine On the contrary. I encourage you to present your algorithm. But no need to say that it replaces special relativity. It presents an alternative as for now.
English
1
0
0
15
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
Earlier I've shown how diffraction can emerge locally (without any waves). Later I've shown, how circular motion emerges in taxicab space. I've shown an alternative to special relativity, ways to disprove it. I've shown lots of stuff unique stuff.. Why nothing happens?
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine

And I actually do have an example of algorithm that leads to diffraction and pattern does depend on the distance between slit edges. It does not work for general case, so I can't provide it. But if you want some details - watch corresponding video. Video link is in comment.

English
1
0
0
153
Robert P. Murphy
Robert P. Murphy@BobMurphyEcon·
I understand why everyone is dunking on Richard Dawkins, but fairness compels me to speak up: If you took a complex project you were working on, uploaded it to Claude, and had a 3-day conversation about it, you wouldn't be making fun of Dawkins for saying it's conscious.
English
313
11
285
62.2K
Kekius Maximus
Kekius Maximus@Kekius_Sage·
Who thinks that quantum stuff should be explained in real terms of real life rather than abstract nonsense?
English
284
31
432
17.6K
Arjen Dijksman
Arjen Dijksman@materion·
@matterasmachine And I am not saying that as gatekeeping. I have not yet predicted all spectral series. I provide just a framework. But other frameworks that have been put to stress test, already work.
English
1
0
0
15
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
Special Relativity does not predict spectrums of your atoms. I don't pretend to know everything as well. To get spectrum you have to know the interaction rules and then laumch those on a huge simulation. I don't have neither interaction rules nor simulation - so please stop expecting something I don't claim. All I claim is that particles are cyclic machines. That's it. Plus taxicab space.
English
0
0
0
12
Arjen Dijksman
Arjen Dijksman@materion·
@matterasmachine Instruct yourself. I am not a fan of Special Relativity, but it predicts various things. And, best of all, it doesn't pretend to explain everything. It knows its limitations.
English
1
0
0
14
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
@materion I don't agree with your "at least". Special Relativity does not predict anything - how it exists? The same for Planck's law, big bang etc.
English
1
0
0
12
Arjen Dijksman
Arjen Dijksman@materion·
@matterasmachine No, that's the easiest part. There are thousands of such different models already published, that give different interesting perspectives. But if you want to be accepted as a challenging theory, you should at least predict correctly the spectral rays series.
English
2
0
0
17
Andrew Fox
Andrew Fox@Mr_Andrew_Fox·
Whilst everyone was focusing on the manosphere and watching Adolescence, nobody has considered the radicalisation of young women, which appears numerically to be a far greater problem.
Andrew Fox tweet media
English
205
482
3.9K
138K
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
@maxtumin What have you invested? You just use the results. Freeloader. And then say something like "We, humanity, did it", when you did **nothing**.
English
1
0
0
13
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
I imagine the frustration of Galileo, when people around him were asking: "Ok, let's suppose you are right and Earth moves around the Sun. So what? How it can be used? How am I supposed to make money out of this information?"
English
6
0
6
206
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
@materion I don't understand why I'm to provide everything. Alternative to Special Relativity, alternative to Big Bang, to Planck law, explaining (and expanding) Newton's laws and conservation of momentum, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle from first principles - should be enough, no?
English
1
0
0
15
Arjen Dijksman
Arjen Dijksman@materion·
@matterasmachine I support good results, like your model for the domain in which is valid: thermal motion. I haven't seen evidence that it can predict the spectral lines. When you can predict that in your framework, you'll have made good progress. Until then, you're just stuck in 1 perspective.
English
1
0
0
12
Max Tumin 🔴
Max Tumin 🔴@maxtumin·
@matterasmachine This is a legitimate question, and might be the reason Galileo avoided Bruno's fate. It wasn't worth it
English
1
0
0
12
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
@materion What is the point to support lie? You can support lie all your life, but you will change nothing. Science move forward one funeral at a time (c).
English
1
0
0
14
Arjen Dijksman
Arjen Dijksman@materion·
@matterasmachine "I cannot have positive interactions with those who was wrong all their life. When being "right" is their identity."
English
1
0
0
10
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
@PhysInHistory Humans are the craziest apes. Our ideas are result of our craziness. Some of them appear to be good - just like some genes appear to be good.
English
0
1
3
128
Physics In History
Physics In History@PhysInHistory·
Mathematics and madness 🧠 I think madness can be an escape. If things are not so good, you maybe want to imagine something better. In madness, I thought I was the most important person in the world. I would not dare to say that there is a direct relation between mathematics and madness, but there is no doubt that great mathematicians suffer from maniacal characteristics, delirium and symptoms of schizophrenia. -- John F. Nash (1928-2015)
Physics In History tweet media
English
12
21
124
7.1K
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
You don't need love for truth. Love is needed only for a "lie". Truth is truth with or without love. It just happens that sometimes new "lie" appears to be closer to truth than the current "lie". Love exists to make you support your new "lie" until it becomes strong enough to compete with older "lie" - just like maternal instinct exists to support the newborn.
Peter Petrides@HappyPete55

@matterasmachine Some would disagree...

English
0
0
1
111
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
@HappyPete55 You don't need love for truth. Love is needed only for a lie. Truth is truth with or without love.
English
1
0
0
7
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
In the animation you see how particles with different energy cause different radiuses. Newton's second law has such a feature.
English
0
0
0
44
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
Here is how the universe works. Particles move through space according to the instructions they contain. When particles meet, they exchange instructions according to certain rules. Physics, the universe, and we ourselves emerge from those rules. See an example of the rules below.
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine

(1/11) The simple algorithm described below shows a direct connection between taxicab and Euclidean space. A discrete particle that can move only a fixed distance per tick, either along the x-axis or the y-axis, produces Euclidean cyclic motion at scale.

English
1
0
0
131
Matter as Machine
Matter as Machine@matterasmachine·
@materion There is only one perspective. One set of rules. Interactions happen on cosmic scale as well.
English
1
0
0
8