CryptoGeezer

Do you honestly think USTC can do 150x and get back to $1? 🤔 There is an alternative - swap your #USTC for #USTR which has a clear plan to reach $1+ and you will be able to stake or swap for #UST1 Swap with referral code BONUS and get 10% more #USTR!! ust1cmm.com/swap/bonus

@Lunanauts_Lunc I 100% agree, its a cash grab on the CP, when it runs out, it then becomes a cash grab on users who hold USTC, because they are just going to dilute value to maintain the system… #LUNC #LUNCArmy #LUNCCommunity #LUNAClassic #USTC

🚨The biggest issue with this #USTC staking proposal isn’t staking itself, it’s what comes next! Right now, they’re very careful to say minting is not required and only presented as a “possible future option.” But buried in the proposal is the reality: staking requires a reward source, and one of the listed long-term options is USTC inflation (minting). Let’s be honest about how this usually plays out...👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽 First, the signal proposal passes. Then staking goes live. People lock up their USTC expecting yield. ⚠️Now you’ve created a system that needs continuous rewards to function. At that point, the narrative shifts: “Community pool isn’t enough” “External funding isn’t reliable” “We need sustainability” 🚨And suddenly… a minting proposal appears! Now here’s where it gets dangerous. ⚠️Once people are staking, they’re financially tied in. If rewards dry up, staking becomes pointless. So the argument becomes: “If you want to keep earning, we have to mint.” That’s not optional anymore! that’s pressure! ⚠️It effectively turns into a form of economic coercion: Minting gets pushed through not because it’s good for USTC, but because stakers are now dependent on it. 🚨And that’s the trap. ⚠️Minting USTC is fundamentally the same mechanism that destroyed trust in the first place, printing tokens out of thin air with no real yield backing them. It doesn’t create value, it redistributes and dilutes it. USTC doesn’t need artificial rewards funded by inflation. It needs real yield fees, revenue, burns, actual economic activity. Without that, staking just becomes a delayed dilution mechanism. So the real question ISN'T: “Do you support staking?” 🤔It’s: “What funds the rewards when the easy options run out?” ⚠️Because if the answer is minting… then we’re walking straight back into the same mistake! ...BE WARNED! THINK ABOUT IT! #ustc #binance #lunc #crypto #blockchain #minting #staking

@BullBoss5 There has been nearly 40M #USTC swapped already so I don’t think it will remain anecdotal, but we will see. Your criticism was that we have made no progress (which I totally agree with), at least we now have a viable option. Using CP funds and minting are just desperation imo.

@CryptoGeezerMM Not much hope in Ceramic's plan. In theory it seems to work but I just don't see who would use it. I believe it will remain anecdotal.

Here’s a great explanation of why minting USTC would be economic suicide for the chain. Ask yourself why anyone would suggest this after four years of pushing the burn narrative 🤔

@BullBoss5 Not at all. Are you aware of Ceramic’s plan for #USTR locking #USTC as collateral? Things are happening, I just don’t support using CP funds for rewards and minting unbacked #USTC 🤦‍♂️

@CryptoGeezerMM Four years of "don’t try anything" and somehow that’s still the plan 👍

Great to see the #CL8Y community getting behind Ceramic’s Aligned Validator Initiative (this is just the last hour) 💪 #LUNCcommunity #USTC

CL8Y is supporting an Aligned Validators Initiative, a program for the public to support validators who: ❌ oppose inflation-funded staking rewards ❌ oppose Community Pool depletion for passive subsidies ✅ support revenue-backed USTC staking funded by real on-chain cash flows We welcome any validator who publicly support these principles. @battleforcelunc is the first to step forward. 👉 To support the Aligned Validators Initiative, redelegate your LUNC to @battleforcelunc. Builders, validators, and community members who support a non-dilutive path for USTC and LUNC: please RT, like, and share.

🚨 Attention #TerraClassic community CALL FOR ACTION The smarter move for the community right now. “Ceramic is building the foundation for ... LUNC.” The train is in motion. Do you want to miss it? #LUNC #USTC #CMM #ACT @LeonardoLUNC @CeramicToken @edTreb001 @LuncDaily

@BattleForceLunc has supported the chain for a long time and has always voted with the chain’s interest at heart. It’s important that we spread voting power by supporting smaller vals, we are far too centralised currently. Please consider redelegating.

This is taken directly from the $USTC staking proposal Supply grows from 6.0B to 7.0B That means one thing Inflation is built into the system You reduce sell pressure short term But increase supply long term This is not recovery This is delayed dilution #LUNC #USTC

@VegasMorph @lunccryptowolf Of course it's on-chain. You need to do a little more research.

@lunccryptowolf From what I know that is not even on chain...lol

🚨Let's discuss the new proposal idea - #USTC staking 👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽 Based on current burn data, USTC is burning at roughly 13.6M USTC per year at the current pace. This proposed staking model would emit (MINT) 200M USTC per year, which means it would print roughly 14.7 years worth of current burns every single year. ⚠️you heard right! 14.7 YEARS WORTH OF USTC BURNS!!! That is the core problem. The proposal talks about locking supply, but then quietly reintroduces the exact issue that damaged confidence in the first place: printing new tokens out of thin air. A 200M annual emission (MINTING) schedule does not create value. It only manufactures rewards by inflating supply. Even if some USTC gets locked, the system is still adding far more new tokens than the chain is currently removing through burns. ✅️Real staking rewards should come from real yield. That means fees, protocol revenue, market-making profits, swap revenue, MM2, or other ecosystem income sources. If rewards are not backed by actual value creation, then they are not yield at all, they are just emissions dressed up as yield. USTC does not need more artificial supply growth. It needs utility, revenue, and a model where rewards are paid from money earned, not money printed. ✅️A staking model funded by real ecosystem yield could strengthen USTC. ⚠️A staking model funded by inflation just undoes years of burn progress! I can NOT vote yes on a model that mints, if minting (emissions as they're calling it) is removed and use real yields i'm a definite yes! Be warned! And do some research why this is bad! #LUNC #BINANCE #crypto #blockchain #cosmos #staking

I’m against minting without value $USTR Minted with CMM treasury backing via $USTC Strengthening the system’s economy $USTC Current direction: minting for staking No real economic growth or utility Simple difference: Minting that builds vs minting that drains Right now Swapping to $USTR looks like the smarter move #LUNC #USTC #USTR

Please take time to read this, we have a potential prop with minting USTC hidden inside (it also wants to raid CP funds). It is a monumentally bad idea and this is why… #LUNCcommunity

@BullBoss5 @JiwonMarco @LeonardoLUNC @11Junicchi11 I totally agree. Minting definitely has its place, but in this case, Vegas is proposing that we mint unbacked USTC just to provide staking rewards. He also wants to use CP funds for rewards. Neither make any sense to me.

@CryptoGeezerMM @JiwonMarco @LeonardoLUNC @11Junicchi11 I don’t care about LUNC. But doing nothing has been killing the chain for years. Stop rejecting everything. Try, iterate, adjust. Minting isn’t automatically a problem, bad, unbacked minting is. Done right, it can be part of the solution.

USTC isn’t dead. A new framework is being built to restructure the economic foundation of USTC. Instead of attempting a direct repeg, the system introduces a phased transition: USTC → USTR → UST1 The model focuses on: • locking supply through the CMM • building collateral • controlled issuance of UST1 Full breakdown on CoinMarketCap 👇 coinmarketcap.com/community/arti…

@LeonardoLUNC @CeramicToken @xBlake_257 Dont forget wormhole closed the bridge early even though they stated a specific date it would close, no support what so ever, just an ‘oh well’ attitude… @CeramicToken stepped up and fixed the code to allow teams, projects and funds one last chance to get out. A true gent!

@JiwonMarco @LeonardoLUNC @BullBoss5 @11Junicchi11 💯

@LeonardoLUNC @BullBoss5 @CryptoGeezerMM @11Junicchi11 Minting ustc when the price is not at $1 is really stupid. Sometimes ppl should buy a brain to think 😆

Liquidity should never become hostage to someone else’s support decision. 🔥 That is why Ceramic’s project matters. We just watched major interoperability routes like Wormhole and Noble create real pain for chains when support gets removed. When that happens, liquidity can get stranded, movement slows down, and users are left holding assets on routes that no longer serve them well 🌉 Many chains simply accepted the situation as normal. 🤷‍♂️ They accepted the IBC cost structure. 🤷‍♂️ They accepted Wormhole. 🤷‍♂️ They accepted Noble. But when 2 of those major routes start causing damage across multiple chains, it becomes obvious that interoperability is not only about convenience. It is also about control, cost, and long-term sovereignty 🧱 This is where CL8Y stands out. 🔥🔥 The bridge is already a success story by itself. It is open source, which means builders can inspect it, improve it, and not depend on a closed black box 🔍 More importantly, it gives chains another path. A path for sovereignty. A path for migration. A path to move liquidity without being trapped by external decisions ⚙️ Ceramic is not only building a bridge, he is building an escape route, a way for projects to migrate and recover any stranded liquidity, allowing them to continue to function as normal and continue their development and day to say activity 🔥🔥 Join Ceramic's official Telegram group here: 🤝 t.me/ceramicliberty #LUNC #TerraClassic #CL8Y #Ceramic #USTR #UST1 #DeFi #Interoperability #OpenSource #Build

The more I follow and learn, the more convinced I am that Ceramic’s framework is the right direction for USTC. As a community, we need patience and discipline, especially avoiding any unnecessary USTC minting.