CeramicToken

38.4K posts

CeramicToken banner
CeramicToken

CeramicToken

@CeramicToken

Ceramic Liberty (CL8Y) the expensive meme coin. Deflationary by design, unstoppable by DeFi. Join the convoy here : https://t.co/k5F92bxKAz

🌏 Katılım Şubat 2025
93 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
CeramicToken
CeramicToken@CeramicToken·
CL8Y is supporting an Aligned Validators Initiative, a program for the public to support validators who: ❌ oppose inflation-funded staking rewards ❌ oppose Community Pool depletion for passive subsidies ✅ support revenue-backed USTC staking funded by real on-chain cash flows We welcome any validator who publicly support these principles. @battleforcelunc is the first to step forward. 👉 To support the Aligned Validators Initiative, redelegate your LUNC to @battleforcelunc. Builders, validators, and community members who support a non-dilutive path for USTC and LUNC: please RT, like, and share.
English
0
21
28
463
CeramicToken retweetledi
Leonardo
Leonardo@LeonardoLUNC·
discourse.luncgoblins.com/t/ustc-recover… Summary of agora post.... Staking USTC doesn’t create value; it redistributes it unless backed by real external revenue. Funding rewards via minting or the community pool risks dilution and reflexive selling, especially in current market conditions. The plan isn’t recovery, it’s a temporary subsidy that likely leads to longer-term decline. 🙂
English
2
3
11
183
CeramicToken retweetledi
Battle Force Validator
Battle Force Validator@BattleForceLunc·
What’s up #LUNCCommunity I hope everyone is having a safe weekend in these troubling times. I’m doubling down on my support for @CeramicToken and their project. I have supported them from their inception and will continue to do so. Your delegations count let’s make this a game changer for the chain. Please support us and our efforts 🙌🙌🙏🙏🫡🫡
CeramicToken@CeramicToken

CL8Y is supporting an Aligned Validators Initiative, a program for the public to support validators who: ❌ oppose inflation-funded staking rewards ❌ oppose Community Pool depletion for passive subsidies ✅ support revenue-backed USTC staking funded by real on-chain cash flows We welcome any validator who publicly support these principles. @battleforcelunc is the first to step forward. 👉 To support the Aligned Validators Initiative, redelegate your LUNC to @battleforcelunc. Builders, validators, and community members who support a non-dilutive path for USTC and LUNC: please RT, like, and share.

English
1
6
12
214
CeramicToken retweetledi
Ricardo △
Ricardo △@ric_ferreira79·
Ricardo △ tweet media
BLADE@BladeDefi

🚨95% OF IGAMING TOKENS WILL DIE IN THIS CYCLE You can try to chase every token You can create multiply hard strategies You can buy every thing that pumps But if you don't know the next you just lose all your money: Everyone keeps saying iGaming is one of the most profitable sectors in crypto, and that’s true But almost no one explains why the majority of tokens in this niche still end up going to zero despite massive revenue behind them The problem is not the product, and it is not the deman The problem is that most tokens were never designed to capture the value generated by the platform itself You can have millions of users, constant betting volume, and hundreds of millions in monthly revenue But if that cashflow isn’t structurally tied to the token, it becomes irrelevant over time This is exactly where most projects break, because instead of building a system where revenue flows into token demand They rely on artificial support mechanisms that only work temporarily The most common example is buybacks funded from treasury, which creates the illusion of demand but in reality is just recycling investor money That creates artificial demand at the start, but once incentives fade, there is nothing left supporting price Another key issue is utility, because if the token is not required inside the product, people don’t hold it, they trade it, and eventually dump it That’s why most iGaming tokens follow the same path: Hype -> distribution -> slow bleed Not because the sector is weak, but because the token is disconnected from the actual money flow Now compare that to a model where the token is directly plugged into the platform’s economics Where buybacks come from real revenue, burns are tied to usage, staking locks supply, and utility creates constant demand from users This is where @1winToken stands out @1winToken is not launching a token to find users, it already has the users, millions of them, with years of operation and consistent revenue behind it The token is simply integrated into an existing system Buybacks are funded from platform revenue, meaning every bet contributes to market demand While 10% of tokens spent inside the platform are burned daily, directly linking activity to supply reduction Staking locks a significant part of circulation, and utility is embedded into the core product through cashback, VIP access, and internal mechanics that require $1WIN On top of that, the token launches natively on both BNB Chain and Solana, expanding liquidity and removing the limitations of a single ecosystem from day one The key difference is simple: Most tokens try to create demand through speculation, while here demand is designed to come from actual usage And in a market that is slowly shifting towards fundamentals, that distinction matters more than anything

English
0
2
5
347
CeramicToken retweetledi
PinkUnicorn80
PinkUnicorn80@PinkUnicorn80_·
I love the idea of staking $USTC. But the reality is, any proposal that also calls for minting $USTC is an absolute mistake. We have spent years attempting to recover from minting caused by the original collapse. @Binance has spent a massive sum of money burning $LUNC, in an attempt to reduce the supply. When minting was proposed years ago, they made a very clear statement in changing how they burn. That statement was a warning shot that should not be ignored! While this is a different proposal and a different coin, the premise remains the same. Minting $USTC, even if the circulating supply is reduced through staking, increases the total supply and devalues the coin. This is a risk we cannot afford to take. #TerraClassic #LuncCommunity
English
3
12
53
2.4K
CeramicToken retweetledi
CryptoGeezer
CryptoGeezer@CryptoGeezerMM·
Here’s a great explanation of why minting USTC would be economic suicide for the chain. Ask yourself why anyone would suggest this after four years of pushing the burn narrative 🤔
Leonardo@LeonardoLUNC

LUNC/USTC has a serious problem, and it’s not the market. It’s people STILL pushing minting with a massive oversupply. ⚠️ Minting is not a strategy. 💀 Minting is how you kill USTC again. Everything @Currency365 laid out is facts: - Over-minting - CEX rejection - Years wasted - And a brain-dead obsession with $1 without fixing the supply x.com/i/status/20347… The facts are simple: Minting + Oversupply = Price Suppression Every. Single. Time. No minting for USTC or LUNC until: • 📉 Oversupply is actually reduced • ✅ OR MM2.0 is LIVE and PROVEN to reduce total supply Anything else = repeating 2022 with extra steps, this time making sure dead means dead. ❓ So why is this STILL being pushed? Because from the outside… 👀 It doesn’t look like ignorance anymore ⚠️ It looks like sabotage Meanwhile… 🛠️ Some of us are actually building 🧠 Not getting baited into distractions/noise 🌐 ust1cmm.com 🌉 bridge.cl8y.com Everything being built here is 100% open source, 100% transparent. 🔗 gitlab.com/users/PlasticD… #USTC #LUNC #TerraClassic #Crypto #DeFi #USTCRepeg #LUNCCommunity #CryptoTruth #BuildNotTalk #Web3

English
3
7
27
2.3K
CeramicToken retweetledi
Leonardo
Leonardo@LeonardoLUNC·
🚨 Security Alert for iPhone Users 🚨 If you’re using iOS/iPhone, update to iOS 26.3.1+ IMMEDIATELY 📲 ⚠️ A new exploit chain with multiple zero-days is actively targeting iOS devices 💰 Crypto wallets across all sorts are at risk 🛡️ Don’t wait, patch now to stay protected 🔗 More info: cloud.google.com/blog/topics/th… Stay safe. Stay updated. #CyberSecurity #iOS #CryptoSecurity #ZeroDay #Blockchain #Crypto #SecurityAlert
English
0
3
10
536
CeramicToken retweetledi
Leonardo
Leonardo@LeonardoLUNC·
Thank you @BattleForceLunc Validators like you are the reason why Ceramic and I have stuck around. The LL/Vegas forthcoming prop to mint USTC is nothing but a distraction from Ceramic’s plan. A year ago, your belief was based on just words, sure, credible words based on facts & history, but still just words. Now it's based on action and work. gitlab.com/users/PlasticD… Ceramic has delivered everything and more to the LUNC community since you first evaluated his plan around 18 months ago. Your belief is the fuel we need to carry on delivering. We will not let you, other validators, and, of course, the LUNC community down. Make a note of my post and remind me in a year that your decision to renew the BattleForce contract for another year was a good one. 🙂 Unfortunately, you're right about MM2.0 being dead. The departure of @ColeStrathclyde and @NicolasBoulay has killed it, as between them, they were the drivers. 🙃
English
0
6
19
457
CeramicToken retweetledi
Leonardo
Leonardo@LeonardoLUNC·
LUNC/USTC has a serious problem, and it’s not the market. It’s people STILL pushing minting with a massive oversupply. ⚠️ Minting is not a strategy. 💀 Minting is how you kill USTC again. Everything @Currency365 laid out is facts: - Over-minting - CEX rejection - Years wasted - And a brain-dead obsession with $1 without fixing the supply x.com/i/status/20347… The facts are simple: Minting + Oversupply = Price Suppression Every. Single. Time. No minting for USTC or LUNC until: • 📉 Oversupply is actually reduced • ✅ OR MM2.0 is LIVE and PROVEN to reduce total supply Anything else = repeating 2022 with extra steps, this time making sure dead means dead. ❓ So why is this STILL being pushed? Because from the outside… 👀 It doesn’t look like ignorance anymore ⚠️ It looks like sabotage Meanwhile… 🛠️ Some of us are actually building 🧠 Not getting baited into distractions/noise 🌐 ust1cmm.com 🌉 bridge.cl8y.com Everything being built here is 100% open source, 100% transparent. 🔗 gitlab.com/users/PlasticD… #USTC #LUNC #TerraClassic #Crypto #DeFi #USTCRepeg #LUNCCommunity #CryptoTruth #BuildNotTalk #Web3
English
12
27
74
5.3K
CeramicToken retweetledi
CryptoGeezer
CryptoGeezer@CryptoGeezerMM·
@BattleForceLunc has supported the chain for a long time and has always voted with the chain’s interest at heart. It’s important that we spread voting power by supporting smaller vals, we are far too centralised currently. Please consider redelegating.
Battle Force Validator@BattleForceLunc

Good Morning #LUNCCommunity Minting #USTC honestly! Who is thinking up these insane ideas? 🤬🤬 ☢️‼️☢️‼️🤬🤬 I have been considering closing the validator over the last couple of months. I’ve spent over two years supporting the chain and we are now facing a critical turning point if the LL/Vegas forthcoming prop passes. I’m going to renew the Battle-Force contract for another year and will continue supporting actual projects that benefit the chain. I honestly believe that @CeramicToken @zodiacs_c is the chains best shot at recovering ❤️‍🩹 I’m going to devote my efforts to support Ceramic and his projects going forward. I believe this provides the very best option for the recovery. MM2.0 is dead, the departure of @ColeStrathclyde killed it, we have also lost @NicolasBoulay. Two major supporters of the #LUNC project. I will veto any forthcoming prop to mint #USTC and I suggest delegating with @LuncBattleForce if you feel the same. @BurnixToken @LVSNode @Lunanauts_Lunc @nuenghandsome @Lunc_DnC @Lunc_Universe #LUNCBurn #LUNCArmy

English
0
3
7
292
CeramicToken retweetledi
Battle Force Validator
Battle Force Validator@BattleForceLunc·
Good Morning #LUNCCommunity Minting #USTC honestly! Who is thinking up these insane ideas? 🤬🤬 ☢️‼️☢️‼️🤬🤬 I have been considering closing the validator over the last couple of months. I’ve spent over two years supporting the chain and we are now facing a critical turning point if the LL/Vegas forthcoming prop passes. I’m going to renew the Battle-Force contract for another year and will continue supporting actual projects that benefit the chain. I honestly believe that @CeramicToken @zodiacs_c is the chains best shot at recovering ❤️‍🩹 I’m going to devote my efforts to support Ceramic and his projects going forward. I believe this provides the very best option for the recovery. MM2.0 is dead, the departure of @ColeStrathclyde killed it, we have also lost @NicolasBoulay. Two major supporters of the #LUNC project. I will veto any forthcoming prop to mint #USTC and I suggest delegating with @LuncBattleForce if you feel the same. @BurnixToken @LVSNode @Lunanauts_Lunc @nuenghandsome @Lunc_DnC @Lunc_Universe #LUNCBurn #LUNCArmy
English
12
12
48
3.7K
CeramicToken retweetledi
Leonardo
Leonardo@LeonardoLUNC·
No, unfortunately not. Your LUNC can only be bridged back via the same bridge that originally moved it to BNB (likely Portal/Wormhole). That’s one of the major limitations of legacy bridge designs; assets often get locked into specific routes. I’d recommend reaching out to their support first, and if needed, escalating further. This is exactly the kind of issue CL8Y Bridge is built to eliminate: no trapped assets, no dependency on a single bridge path. 😞
English
0
2
11
540
CeramicToken retweetledi
SpaceshipRacer - Lunc
SpaceshipRacer - Lunc@SpaceshipRacer·
Good new lunc We are progressing faster than expected 🟢Game engine 🟡Blancing 🟢sercurity(up to date) 🟢database 🟡User Interface 🟢wallet deposits 🟢NFTs 🟡wallet withdraws 🟠Beta ready (Simplified timeline for understanding purposes)
English
0
1
3
91
CeramicToken retweetledi
Amm-S | Crypto Enthusiast
This is taken directly from the $USTC staking proposal Supply grows from 6.0B to 7.0B That means one thing Inflation is built into the system You reduce sell pressure short term But increase supply long term This is not recovery This is delayed dilution #LUNC #USTC
Amm-S | Crypto Enthusiast tweet mediaAmm-S | Crypto Enthusiast tweet media
English
1
4
10
457
CeramicToken retweetledi
Orbitwire.io
Orbitwire.io@OrbitWire_io·
What are your favorite Layer 2 tokens in the $LUNC ecosystem? Trade On-Chain with us : orbitwire.io
Orbitwire.io tweet media
English
24
24
112
4.7K
CeramicToken retweetledi
🌠 Validator by Lunanauts | StatsBin.com
🚨Let's discuss the new proposal idea - #USTC staking 👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽 Based on current burn data, USTC is burning at roughly 13.6M USTC per year at the current pace. This proposed staking model would emit (MINT) 200M USTC per year, which means it would print roughly 14.7 years worth of current burns every single year. ⚠️you heard right! 14.7 YEARS WORTH OF USTC BURNS!!! That is the core problem. The proposal talks about locking supply, but then quietly reintroduces the exact issue that damaged confidence in the first place: printing new tokens out of thin air. A 200M annual emission (MINTING) schedule does not create value. It only manufactures rewards by inflating supply. Even if some USTC gets locked, the system is still adding far more new tokens than the chain is currently removing through burns. ✅️Real staking rewards should come from real yield. That means fees, protocol revenue, market-making profits, swap revenue, MM2, or other ecosystem income sources. If rewards are not backed by actual value creation, then they are not yield at all, they are just emissions dressed up as yield. USTC does not need more artificial supply growth. It needs utility, revenue, and a model where rewards are paid from money earned, not money printed. ✅️A staking model funded by real ecosystem yield could strengthen USTC. ⚠️A staking model funded by inflation just undoes years of burn progress! I can NOT vote yes on a model that mints, if minting (emissions as they're calling it) is removed and use real yields i'm a definite yes! Be warned! And do some research why this is bad! #LUNC #BINANCE #crypto #blockchain #cosmos #staking
🌠 Validator by Lunanauts | StatsBin.com tweet media
English
4
17
64
1.7K