LVS retweetledi
Great to see the #CL8Y community getting behind Ceramic’s Aligned Validator Initiative (this is just the last hour) 💪
#LUNCcommunity #USTC
English
LVS
3.4K posts
LVS retweetledi
Why is minting USTC such a big deal for Ceramic and me?
We want the USTC forever locked in the CMM to become more valuable.
USTC becomes more valuable over time through reduced circulating supply and real ecosystem activity.
Value isn’t created by printing more, it’s built through scarcity + usage.
English
LVS retweetledi
discourse.luncgoblins.com/t/ustc-recover…
Summary of agora post....
Staking USTC doesn’t create value; it redistributes it unless backed by real external revenue.
Funding rewards via minting or the community pool risks dilution and reflexive selling, especially in current market conditions.
The plan isn’t recovery, it’s a temporary subsidy that likely leads to longer-term decline. 🙂
English
LVS retweetledi
What’s up #LUNCCommunity
I hope everyone is having a safe weekend in these troubling times.
I’m doubling down on my support for @CeramicToken and their project.
I have supported them from their inception and will continue to do so.
Your delegations count let’s make this a game changer for the chain. Please support us and our efforts
🙌🙌🙏🙏🫡🫡
CeramicToken@CeramicToken
CL8Y is supporting an Aligned Validators Initiative, a program for the public to support validators who: ❌ oppose inflation-funded staking rewards ❌ oppose Community Pool depletion for passive subsidies ✅ support revenue-backed USTC staking funded by real on-chain cash flows We welcome any validator who publicly support these principles. @battleforcelunc is the first to step forward. 👉 To support the Aligned Validators Initiative, redelegate your LUNC to @battleforcelunc. Builders, validators, and community members who support a non-dilutive path for USTC and LUNC: please RT, like, and share.
English
LVS retweetledi
CL8Y is supporting an Aligned Validators Initiative, a program for the public to support validators who:
❌ oppose inflation-funded staking rewards
❌ oppose Community Pool depletion for passive subsidies
✅ support revenue-backed USTC staking funded by real on-chain cash flows
We welcome any validator who publicly support these principles. @battleforcelunc is the first to step forward.
👉 To support the Aligned Validators Initiative, redelegate your LUNC to @battleforcelunc.
Builders, validators, and community members who support a non-dilutive path for USTC and LUNC: please RT, like, and share.
English
English
LVS retweetledi
LUNC/USTC has a serious problem, and it’s not the market.
It’s people STILL pushing minting with a massive oversupply.
⚠️ Minting is not a strategy.
💀 Minting is how you kill USTC again.
Everything @Currency365 laid out is facts:
- Over-minting
- CEX rejection
- Years wasted
- And a brain-dead obsession with $1 without fixing the supply
x.com/i/status/20347…
The facts are simple:
Minting + Oversupply = Price Suppression
Every. Single. Time.
No minting for USTC or LUNC until:
• 📉 Oversupply is actually reduced
• ✅ OR MM2.0 is LIVE and PROVEN to reduce total supply
Anything else = repeating 2022 with extra steps, this time making sure dead means dead.
❓ So why is this STILL being pushed?
Because from the outside…
👀 It doesn’t look like ignorance anymore
⚠️ It looks like sabotage
Meanwhile…
🛠️ Some of us are actually building
🧠 Not getting baited into distractions/noise
🌐 ust1cmm.com
🌉 bridge.cl8y.com
Everything being built here is 100% open source, 100% transparent.
🔗 gitlab.com/users/PlasticD…
#USTC #LUNC #TerraClassic #Crypto #DeFi #USTCRepeg #LUNCCommunity #CryptoTruth #BuildNotTalk #Web3
English
LVS retweetledi
Thank you @BattleForceLunc
Validators like you are the reason why Ceramic and I have stuck around.
The LL/Vegas forthcoming prop to mint USTC is nothing but a distraction from Ceramic’s plan.
A year ago, your belief was based on just words, sure, credible words based on facts & history, but still just words. Now it's based on action and work.
gitlab.com/users/PlasticD…
Ceramic has delivered everything and more to the LUNC community since you first evaluated his plan around 18 months ago.
Your belief is the fuel we need to carry on delivering.
We will not let you, other validators, and, of course, the LUNC community down.
Make a note of my post and remind me in a year that your decision to renew the BattleForce contract for another year was a good one. 🙂
Unfortunately, you're right about MM2.0 being dead. The departure of @ColeStrathclyde and @NicolasBoulay has killed it, as between them, they were the drivers. 🙃
English
LVS retweetledi
🚨 Security Alert for iPhone Users 🚨
If you’re using iOS/iPhone, update to iOS 26.3.1+ IMMEDIATELY 📲
⚠️ A new exploit chain with multiple zero-days is actively targeting iOS devices
💰 Crypto wallets across all sorts are at risk
🛡️ Don’t wait, patch now to stay protected
🔗 More info:
cloud.google.com/blog/topics/th…
Stay safe. Stay updated.
#CyberSecurity #iOS #CryptoSecurity #ZeroDay #Blockchain #Crypto #SecurityAlert
English
@xBlake_257 @BattleForceLunc He said he would support it, but it was @NicolasBoulay who was leading it, I suspect he is deploying the forex on DO chain, would have to see if he still has appetite for it with the current response his proposal got from Vegas and LUNCLive
English
@BattleForceLunc Is the MM 2.0 dead i know strath said he would still build it but after that hes done
English
LVS retweetledi
Good Morning #LUNCCommunity
Minting #USTC honestly! Who is thinking up these insane ideas? 🤬🤬 ☢️‼️☢️‼️🤬🤬
I have been considering closing the validator over the last couple of months. I’ve spent over two years supporting the chain and we are now facing a critical turning point if the LL/Vegas forthcoming prop passes.
I’m going to renew the Battle-Force contract for another year and will continue supporting actual projects that benefit the chain.
I honestly believe that @CeramicToken @zodiacs_c is the chains best shot at recovering ❤️🩹 I’m going to devote my efforts to support Ceramic and his projects going forward. I believe this provides the very best option for the recovery.
MM2.0 is dead, the departure of @ColeStrathclyde killed it, we have also lost @NicolasBoulay. Two major supporters of the #LUNC project.
I will veto any forthcoming prop to mint #USTC and I suggest delegating with @LuncBattleForce if you feel the same.
@BurnixToken @LVSNode @Lunanauts_Lunc @nuenghandsome @Lunc_DnC @Lunc_Universe #LUNCBurn #LUNCArmy
English
@VegasMorph @LuncBurnItAll @PatrickSzczep Much better than minting 14.7years worth of USTC burns, each year…
English
@LVSNode @LuncBurnItAll @PatrickSzczep duche here, do the calculations for that, and you will see that the Apr is awful, so will not attract any new investors, plus by doing that you decrease the Apr of lunc that will make more sale pressure off chain. But thank you for the input
English
@VegasMorph
USTC staking - Yes
USTC minting - No
According to props #11868, the community has unanimously voted (98.95% yes votes) for NO MINTING USTC.
Your Ustc staking prop *does not officially say it will mint*, but why even bring it up after we have worked so hard at burning it down for a future peg, and are waiting for TFL and others to burn it down more?
I know at least 10 validators, worth 100's of billions in lunc, who would happily vote yes on your prop if you remove that one criteria of "maybe mint in the future".
Do the right thing, get rid of the minting talk, we will figure out a way down the road on how to sustain the pool if it is successful.
Let's get that part removed, and let's get this passed. 💪💯
Also, thank you @LVSNode, @nuenghandsome and @Currency365 for making this video and bringing this small but very important detail to our attention.
Currency365@Currency365
Hidden Danger in Vegas USTC Staking Proposal youtu.be/_SgjPi2DtCQ #ustc #luna #lunc #lunaclassic #staking #repeg #proposal #crypto #cryptocurrency #cryptonews
English
@VegasMorph Also didnt you post it on X first to get a wider audience, which is where we all saw it? Now you are complaining about the feedback?
#LUNC #LUNCCommunity #LUNCArmy #USTC #TerraClassic
English
Ask yourself this: why are you only seeing posts on X about the USTC proposal instead of proper discussion on the forum, where it actually matters?
So far, every comment on the forum has been constructive and aligned with the proposal , which clearly shows the community is largely supportive.
All the drama on X? Feels more like a desperate call for attention than genuine concern.
If you have real feedback or concerns, bring them to the forum where they can be properly addressed , especially before the proposal goes live next week.
Let’s keep it productive.
#LUNC $LUNC #USTC $USTC #TerraClassic
English
@VegasMorph 90% of the community are not on the forum, so the only way to inform them is via the media they use…
English
@LuncBurnItAll @VegasMorph Some data to support why this is a bad idea - 200M USTC is 14.7years worth of USTC burns…
x.com/lunanauts_lunc…
🌠 Validator by Lunanauts | StatsBin.com@Lunanauts_Lunc
🚨Let's discuss the new proposal idea - #USTC staking 👇🏽👇🏽👇🏽 Based on current burn data, USTC is burning at roughly 13.6M USTC per year at the current pace. This proposed staking model would emit (MINT) 200M USTC per year, which means it would print roughly 14.7 years worth of current burns every single year. ⚠️you heard right! 14.7 YEARS WORTH OF USTC BURNS!!! That is the core problem. The proposal talks about locking supply, but then quietly reintroduces the exact issue that damaged confidence in the first place: printing new tokens out of thin air. A 200M annual emission (MINTING) schedule does not create value. It only manufactures rewards by inflating supply. Even if some USTC gets locked, the system is still adding far more new tokens than the chain is currently removing through burns. ✅️Real staking rewards should come from real yield. That means fees, protocol revenue, market-making profits, swap revenue, MM2, or other ecosystem income sources. If rewards are not backed by actual value creation, then they are not yield at all, they are just emissions dressed up as yield. USTC does not need more artificial supply growth. It needs utility, revenue, and a model where rewards are paid from money earned, not money printed. ✅️A staking model funded by real ecosystem yield could strengthen USTC. ⚠️A staking model funded by inflation just undoes years of burn progress! I can NOT vote yes on a model that mints, if minting (emissions as they're calling it) is removed and use real yields i'm a definite yes! Be warned! And do some research why this is bad! #LUNC #BINANCE #crypto #blockchain #cosmos #staking
English
LVS retweetledi
opBNB is a Layer 2 scaling solution on BNB Chain that makes transactions much cheaper and faster by processing them off-chain and then settling back to BNB.
Cost benefit:
Instead of paying, say, $0.20–$1 per transaction on BNB, opBNB can bring that down to fractions of a cent.
If an app processes 1 million transactions:
On BNB → ~$200k+ in fees
On opBNB → potentially <$1k
That’s why it’s ideal for high-volume use cases like gaming, micro-payments, and DeFi. 😀
English
@CryptoGeezerMM @VegasMorph @lunccryptowolf You need to actually do the work for Vegas or he wont know, just like someone else did the prop for him
Here Vegas finder.terraclassic.community/columbus-5/add… its all on chain, open source, transparent and auditable
English
@VegasMorph @lunccryptowolf Of course it's on-chain. You need to do a little more research.
English
LVS retweetledi
@solana integration into cl8y.bridge.com has begun. Core upgrades are complete, now in bugfixing and testing on devnet.
CZodiac@zodiacs_c
The wrapping contracts are now in devnet testing - unit tests have been completed. The contracts are updated in the ustr-cmm repository, but e2e, devnet, and qa testing is on the cl8y-dex-terraclassic repository as this is where the contracts will primarily be used via the router. - When native tokens are wrapped/unwrapped, a one time 1% fee is charged, 50% goes to the ust1cmm.com treasury and 50% is the onchain burn tax. This means wrapping and unwrapping will not only support the onchain burn, but will also increase the amount of ustc and lunc locked in the UST1CMM.com treasury - supporting the ecosystem while simultaneously helping ustr repeg faster. - Once you wrap your ustc and lunc, you can trade all tokens on the cl8y dex without being charged the onchain taxes. This increases onchain demand for $ustc and @TerraClassicLC lunc by encouraging coins to lock these assets in liquidity without hurting volume. Please share your thoughts! The core idea is to support the ecosystem's burn on ustc and lunc via the wrap/unwrap without the current issues where memecoins prefer non lunc/ustc pairs to reduce trading fees - so we can both have the burn and increase onchain demand and liquidity for ustc and lunc. New ideas welcome! Since we havent deployed, its the best time to update the design. - CF
English