๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ

32.5K posts

๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ banner
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ

๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ

@GranCube

Analyzing blockchain governance and upgrade dynamics. Focused on institutional-grade infrastructure and long-term protocol resilience. Tezos.

Bergabung Mayฤฑs 2018
955 Mengikuti1K Pengikut
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ me-retweet
Akashi ๐ŸŒฎ
Akashi ๐ŸŒฎ@akashitezยท
ใƒ†ใ‚พใ‚น๏ผˆTezos๏ผšXTZ๏ผ‰ใ„ใ„ใ‚“ใ˜ใ‚ƒใชใ„ใงใ™ใ‹๐Ÿ”ต
Chainspect@chainspect_app

๐Ÿง  The Most Productive Ecosystems in Web3 Same number of devs doesn't mean same output We ranked chains by commits per developer. Some ecosystems are 5x more productive than others Let that sink in ๐Ÿ‘‡

ๆ—ฅๆœฌ่ชž
0
4
16
245
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ me-retweet
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurBยท
If Satoshi are dead or not able to access their coins, it doesn't make a difference. If they're alive and able to access them, they need to protect them anyway from being stolen by someone with a quantum computer, which means they have to take an action. All the fork is doing is forcing this action to happen by a certain date.
English
0
1
4
109
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ me-retweet
FromFriendsโ„ข
FromFriendsโ„ข@FromFriends__ยท
๐Ÿฅณ My @Tezos Ecosystem DAO proposal TEZTO just reached 100% yes votes! Thank you all for the incredible support! ๐Ÿ™
FromFriendsโ„ข tweet media
English
0
1
11
885
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ me-retweet
Tezos
Tezos@tezosยท
Only fools break the rules.. or do they? ๐ŸŽฒ Roll the dice and follow the rules of @Figure31โ€™s new project, going live at 1pm EST on Tezos EVM ( @Etherlink ). Chance, code, and creativity collide in real time onchain. โ†“
English
6
16
70
3K
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ me-retweet
Baking Bad
Baking Bad@TezosBakingBadยท
@ArthurB presents "Preparing Blockchains for Post-Quantum Era" on @EthCC Quantum computers arenโ€™t here yet-their upgrade path is. The way blockchains prepare: โœ…Hybrid EC+PQ keys โœ…Gradual deprecation without user lockout Pleasant to see @tezos at the forefront of this process!
Baking Bad tweet media
English
2
16
44
1.1K
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ me-retweet
Now Media
Now Media@nowmediaยท
First submissions are rolling in for our Tezos EVM (@etherlink) Hackathon The quality so far ๐Ÿ‘€ Have you started yours yet? โ†“
Now Media tweet media
English
1
13
36
1.8K
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraphยท
Whatโ€™s one project you think is massively underrated right now? ๐Ÿ‘‡
English
839
59
484
67.7K
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ me-retweet
Akashi ๐ŸŒฎ
Akashi ๐ŸŒฎ@akashitezยท
ใƒ†ใ‚พใ‚นใงRWA๏ผˆใƒชใ‚ขใƒซใƒฏใƒผใƒซใƒ‰ใ‚ขใ‚ปใƒƒใƒˆ๏ผ‰ใฎใ‚ฆใƒฉใƒณใ‹ใ‚ดใƒผใƒซใƒ‰ใ‚’1ใƒ‰ใƒซๅˆ†ใ‚’้…ใฃใฆใ‚‹ใ“ใจใ‚’ๆ—ฅๆœฌ่ชžใงๆ—ฅๆœฌไบบๅ‘ใ‘ใซใ“ใฃใใ‚Šใƒใ‚นใƒˆใ—ใ‚ˆใ†ใ‹ใจๆ€ใฃใŸใ‘ใฉใ€ใ‚‚ใฏใ‚„่‡ชๅ‹•็ฟป่จณใชใ‚“ใ ใ‚ˆใญ๐Ÿ˜‹
Elon Musk@elonmusk

Grok automatically translating and recommending ๐• posts from other languages is starting to work

ๆ—ฅๆœฌ่ชž
0
1
3
226
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ me-retweet
TenX (TSX-V : $TNX)
TenX (TSX-V : $TNX)@TenXprotocolsยท
TenX Protocols has received a delegation of ~7.8M XTZ from the @TezosFoundation, with 6M XTZ now staked on a TenX-operated validator. This strengthens our validator operations on @tezos and supports our strategy of building recurring revenue through staking infrastructure. Delegation reflects trust in validator performance, reliability, and long-term alignment. Read the full news release: tenxprotocols.substack.com/p/tenx-protocoโ€ฆ TSX-V: $TNX #TenXProtocols #Tezos $XTZ #BlockchainInfrastructure
TenX (TSX-V : $TNX) tweet media
English
0
11
38
1.1K
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡นMaSk
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡นMaSk@Mark_Ska76ยท
@GranCube The Token $XTZ is dead. Even at TezDev nobody talked about the Token. @Tezos will make it's way without any doubt. But the Token holders will not participate. Etherlink will kill the Token XTZ
English
1
0
0
58
DCF GOD
DCF GOD@dcfgodยท
โ€œas unofficial Bitcoin security researcher, I still believe Bitcoin PoW is cooked due to the dwindling security budgetโ€ The best bitcoin is ethereum The ef ships hard things often, quantum resistance will happen
Justin Drake@drakefjustin

Today is a monumentous day for quantum computing and cryptography. Two breakthrough papers just landed (links in next tweet). Both papers improve Shor's algorithm, infamous for cracking RSA and elliptic curve cryptography. The two results compound, optimising separate layers of the quantum stack. The results are shocking. I expect a narrative shift and a further R&D boost toward post-quantum cryptography. The first paper is by Google Quantum AI. They tackle the (logical) Shor algorithm, tailoring it to crack Bitcoin and Ethereum signatures. The algorithm runs on ~1K logical qubits for the 256-bit elliptic curve secp256k1. Due to the low circuit depth, a fast superconducting computer would recover private keys in minutes. I'm grateful to have joined as a late paper co-author, in large part for the chance to interact with experts and the alpha gleaned from internal discussions. The second paper is by a stealthy startup called Oratomic, with ex-Google and prominent Caltech faculty. Their starting point is Google's improvements to the logical quantum circuit. They then apply improvements at the physical layer, with tricks specific to neutral atom quantum computers. The result estimates that 26,000 atomic qubits are sufficient to break 256-bit elliptic curve signatures. This would be roughly a 40x improvement in physical qubit count over previous state-of-the-art. On the flip side, a single Shor run would take ~10 days due to the relatively slow speed of neutral atoms. Below are my key takeaways. As a disclaimer, I am not a quantum expert. Time is needed for the results to be properly vetted. Based on my interactions with the team, I have faith the Google Quantum AI results are conservative. The Oratomic paper is much harder for me to assess, especially because of the use of more exotic qLDPC codes. I will take it with a grain of salt until the dust settles. โ†’ q-day: My confidence in q-day by 2032 has shot up significantly. IMO there's at least a 10% chance that by 2032 a quantum computer recovers a secp256k1 ECDSA private key from an exposed public key. While a cryptographically-relevant quantum computer (CRQC) before 2030 still feels unlikely, now is undoubtedly the time to start preparing. โ†’ censorship: The Google paper uses a zero-knowledge (ZK) proof to demonstrate the algorithm's existence without leaking actual optimisations. From now on, assume state-of-the-art algorithms will be censored. There may be self-censorship for moral or commercial reasons, or because of government pressure. A blackout in academic publications would be a tell-tale sign. โ†’ cracking time: A superconducting quantum computer, the type Google is building, could crack keys in minutes. This is because the optimised quantum circuit is just 100M Toffoli gates, which is surprisingly shallow. (Toffoli gates are hard because they require production of so-called "magic states".) Toffoli gates would consume ~10 microseconds on a superconducting platform, totalling ~1,000 sec of Shor runtime. โ†’ latency optimisations: Two latency optimisations bring key cracking time to single-digit minutes. The first parallelises computation across quantum devices. The second involves feeding the pubkey to the quantum computer mid-flight, after a generic setup phase. โ†’ fast- and slow-clock: At first approximation there are two families of quantum computers. The fast-clock flavour, which includes superconducting and photonic architectures, runs at roughly 100 kHz. The slow-clock flavour, which includes trapped ion and neutral atom architectures, runs roughly 1,000x slower (~100 Hz, or ~1 week to crack a single key). โ†’ qubit count: The size-optimised variant of the algorithm runs on 1,200 logical qubits. On a superconducting computer with surface code error correction that's roughly 500K physical qubits, a 400:1 physical-to-logical ratio. The surface code is conservative, assuming only four-way nearest-neighbour grid connectivity. It was demonstrated last year by Google on a real quantum computer. โ†’ future gains: Low-hanging fruit is still being picked, with at least one of the Google optimisations resulting from a surprisingly simple observation. Interestingly, AI was not (yet!) tasked to find optimisations. This was also the first time authors such as Craig Gidney attacked elliptic curves (as opposed to RSA). Shor logical qubit count could plausibly go under 1K soonish. โ†’ error correction: The physical-to-logical ratio for superconducting computers could go under 100:1. For superconducting computers that would be mean ~100K physical qubits for a CRQC, two orders of magnitude away from state of the art. Neutral atoms quantum computers are amenable to error correcting codes other than the surface code. While much slower to run, they can bring down the physical to logical qubit ratio closer to 10:1. โ†’ Bitcoin PoW: Commercially-viable Bitcoin PoW via Grover's algorithm is not happening any time soon. We're talking decades, possibly centuries away. This observation should help focus the discussion on ECDSA and Schnorr. (Side note: as unofficial Bitcoin security researcher, I still believe Bitcoin PoW is cooked due to the dwindling security budget.) โ†’ team quality: The folks at Google Quantum AI are the real deal. Craig Gidney (@CraigGidney) is arguably the world's top quantum circuit optimisooor. Just last year he squeezed 10x out of Shor for RSA, bringing the physical qubit count down from 10M to 1M. Special thanks to the Google team for patiently answering all my newb questions with detailed, fact-based answers. I was expecting some hype, but found none.

English
16
7
194
20.4K
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ
@Ethprofit Bitcoin and Ethereum can't make it in time. That's a shame. Tezos will be implemented soon. It's faster than Google๐Ÿค“ Tezos also implements EVM, so please consider that. If you want to transfer, it's now๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿป #Tezos $XTZ $ETH $BTC
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ@GranCube

Tezos just announced quantum-resistant user keys for protocol U upgrade using NIST's ML-DSA-44! Future-proofing $XTZ against quantum threats.๐Ÿค“ #Tezos #PostQuantum #QuantumResistant #XTZ

English
0
3
12
126
๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฏ๐—ฒ me-retweet
The Defiant
The Defiant@DefiantNewsยท
Commodity tokenization platform @metalsofficial is live on @tezos, giving users access to tokenized gold, uranium, and a basket of rare-earth metals through a single web application. Read more: thedefiant.io/news/blockchaiโ€ฆ
The Defiant tweet media
English
2
6
29
1.2K