Arthur B.

31K posts

Arthur B. banner
Arthur B.

Arthur B.

@ArthurB

@Tezos co-founder w/ wife @breitwoman & Agitprop founder. Aligning ASI to not zap everyone is unsolved, that's bad. Tezos stuff, high context humor & more.

arthurb.tez Katılım Mart 2008
1.4K Takip Edilen43.5K Takipçiler
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurB·
Given enough GPUs, all bugs are shallow.
English
0
3
14
1.6K
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurB·
@ESRogs Yes, usually these make me go "what!?" but here this seems expected, unless I'm missing something?
English
0
0
0
108
Arthur B. retweetledi
Nick Neuman
Nick Neuman@Nneuman·
Irony is undefeated- the UK is banning stablecoin self custody, while Stripe is launching MPP enabling AI to use self hosted wallets all over the internet. If you try to regulate new tech with old rules, you’ll cut off any chance at your country benefitting from innovation.
Nick Neuman tweet media
English
57
101
682
55.9K
Arthur B. retweetledi
CryptoTaxGuy
CryptoTaxGuy@CryptoTaxGuyETH·
TAXATION OF STAKING REWARDS Yesterday, CahillNXT submitted a memo to Treasury on the US taxation of staking rewards. We hope this memorandum is helpful to taxpayers, their advisors, and policymakers thinking about the US tax treatment of staking. Link below.
CryptoTaxGuy tweet media
English
9
10
49
19.6K
Peter Van Valkenburgh
Peter Van Valkenburgh@valkenburgh·
Working my way through the new SEC and CFTC interpretive guidance and I'm loving footnote 96. Why? In many ways FN96 explains the core approach: earlier in the guidance we are told that tokens whose value comes from functionality and supply/demand rather than essential managerial efforts of a promoter are not securities. But how do you define functionality and a lack of managerial efforts (i.e. decentralization) post ICO...? Not by some technocratic general standard! But rather by the actual promises of the original promoters (and whether they've been satisfied or otherwise extinguished). A very Hayekian approach that avoids regulatory hubris and metaphysical wrangling over the nature of "functionality" or "decentralization." Well done.
Peter Van Valkenburgh tweet media
English
16
31
144
10.4K
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurB·
@peterwildeford I literally have a tmux session open on my phone and send commands while I rest between sets.
English
2
1
38
2.1K
Peter Wildeford🇺🇸🚀
Peter Wildeford🇺🇸🚀@peterwildeford·
Guys, Claude Code + gym goes hard. You can do Claude Code and then lift weights while Claude is working. Why aren't all the software engineers suddenly swole right now?
English
53
18
751
49K
Arthur B. retweetledi
nic carter
nic carter@nic_carter·
as someone that talks to journos almost every day: talking to journos is generally zero sum. if they dont care about you, they will absolutely print quotes that make you look bad. if they really value you as a source they might try and work with you a bit, but random inbound from a journalist is always dangerous, because it's usually not an iterated game. they are playing by a different ruleset that's unknown to you, unless you were a journalist yourself or extremely well press trained. their rules don't conform to your assumptions of what is ethical or right. and half the time the journalist might seem like your friend but their editor will absolutely throw you under the bus with no qualms whatsoever. often times it's the editor that determines the shape or color of the reporting in the end, not the actual person you spoke to. so you can get screwed over that way. unless you are extremely disciplined, able to stay perfectly on message, able to never say anything that sounds bad out of context, and willing to abide by extremely unusual rules of discourse (laying out explicit conditions for on the record/on background/ off the record BEFORE saying anything), it's usually not worth it. but of course everyone likes to see their name in print so they do it anyway.
English
4
6
104
12.6K
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurB·
I'm an expert in OpenSea delays, AMA
dfinzer.eth | opensea@dfinzer

an update on $SEA. the team has been building at full speed, and the foundation had planned to kick off the first steps as part of our march 30th event. but @openseafdn is pushing back the timeline. a delay is a delay. i’m not going to dress it up, and i know how it lands. the reality is that market conditions are challenging across crypto right now, and $SEA only launches once. @openseafdn could force the original date, or we could ensure every piece is in place and make this moment what this community deserves. we gave a tremendous amount of thought to how to do right here. I’m thankful to @HollanderAdam for bringing the community’s voice into every conversation. we’ll be doing the following: no more waves: the current rewards wave will be our last. optional fee refund: recognizing that we originally committed to a Q1 date, we’re offering refunds of the platform fees we retained while participating in the rewards waves (3 - 6) that followed our timing announcement. if you like, you can receive a refund of those fees, which when combined with treasure chest prizes, essentially means all of your trading during that period was on us. if you opt for a refund, the Treasures you were awarded during these waves will be removed from your account. details on this process will follow. honoring existing Treasures: for Treasures you continue to hold, our prior commitment stands: they will be meaningfully considered by the Foundation at TGE. this is independent from allocations for historical activity. 0% fees for 60 days: starting on march 31st, opensea will reduce our own token trading fees to 0%. we want to make it a no-brainer for everyone to experience our new platform: cross-chain token trading, mobile app, perps and more. after this 60 day period, we will put a new system in place that makes fees significantly more competitive for anyone trading consistently on opensea. product updates: while we’re postponing our march 30th event, we’ll host a separate one in the coming months focused on product updates. it’s been incredible to see the early responses to our mobile app, and we can’t wait to get it into more people’s hands. so if not now, wen? when we announced last year, it was too early. that created unnecessary uncertainty and reactivity. so when the Foundation sets a new timeline, it will be deliberate and specific. here’s why i’m confident that’s the right move: i’ve been building opensea for almost a decade. when this started, we were two people and the only thing you could trade on OS was cryptokitties. i’ve watched this space go from a niche curiosity to billions in volume to where we are today. the thing that’s carried us through every cycle was a willingness to make hard calls when it mattered. when our market crashed, we rebuilt from zero: an entirely new stack, a new product, and a new team culture. that hurt in the short term. but today OS2 is undeniably the strongest marketplace offering, and it’s the foundation everything sits on. we have huge ambitions as a company, and we’re here for the long game. making all of non-custodial crypto delightful on mobile is just the beginning. that means we have to set a very high bar for everything we do, and it’s why i’m so protective of delivering a launch that’s worthy of this community and everything we’re putting into this.

English
9
6
67
4.5K
Arthur B. retweetledi
Siberian fox🔸
Siberian fox🔸@SilverVVulpes·
This feels like responding to the threat of viral pandemics by instructing people to individually GO TO THE GYM and STAY IN BETTER HEALTH I think a healthy human reaction if you really believe this story is prevent ending with such a permanent underclass,especially as today's...
Garett Jones@GarettJones

English
10
10
146
16.7K
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurB·
@jd_pressman We could get DNA but we don't know how to create chromosomes from DNA.
English
0
0
2
342
John David Pressman
John David Pressman@jd_pressman·
My position remains that we should exhume Neumann and clone him.
English
9
3
119
5.6K
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurB·
@jd_pressman The Culture is a good mix of a and b, but even if the stars aligned it doesn't make sense for biological humans to remain. The cost of the world passing you by is too great, and the risk to your mind of staying biological is huge.
English
0
0
2
112
John David Pressman
John David Pressman@jd_pressman·
@ArthurB It seems fairly obvious that the modal outcome, if we avoid disaster, looks more like the empire of industrial mind pirate slavers in The Quantum Thief than it does like The Culture.
English
1
0
1
139
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurB·
A world with ASI is a world with nanotech and, if we survive it, a world of uploads. A world of uploads is either: a) strongly coercive, tightly regulating the creation of new minds, or b) a world in which defense is somehow much cheaper than offense enabling uncharacteristically strong property rights, c) bleek and malthusian
English
5
0
34
2.8K
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurB·
@jd_pressman Death is worse, but even the good scenarios are their own kind of depressing.
English
1
0
4
256
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurB·
10,000 years is a tiny part of the history of humanity, it's not a long time. The pyramids were built just 4,500 years ago. My point is that people overgeneralize the lesson to be learned from the error of Ehrlich. On relatively small timescales at relatively small growth rate malthusianism is real. As for the services, you're about to see what happens to margins in this industry when datacenters can replace a very limited supply of workers. The cost of intellectual labor will fall to the cost of energy in the coming years.
English
0
0
1
47
Christopher Nelli
Christopher Nelli@Nellinose·
@ArthurB @nic_carter My point on a more realistic time scale of 100-200 years is that most growth will be in services, not goods. Easily achievable. No need for straw man arguments.
English
1
0
0
44
nic carter
nic carter@nic_carter·
Paul Ehrlich was a family friend. One time I asked him to come speak to my AP Bio class. He spent an hour telling my classmates apocalyptic stories about how the earth would soon be unfit for human life. Some left the class in tears. I remember it vividly to this day. May God rest his soul
English
30
6
257
36.4K
Arthur B.
Arthur B.@ArthurB·
You underestimate how ridiculous of a number 1.02¹⁰⁰⁰⁰ is. It's 10⁸⁶, there are about a million times fewer atoms than this in the universe. It's counter intuitive because neither 2% per year not 10,000 years seem like very big numbers, on the scale of human history, yet here we are.
English
3
0
2
109
Christopher Nelli
Christopher Nelli@Nellinose·
@ArthurB @nic_carter You are just as wrong as he was. Most economic growth today is in services that consume much less energy than goods.
English
1
0
0
103