GMAN

📊 MMAT / MMTLP In re Meta Materials Inc. — Case No. 24-50792-gs U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Nevada Filings Date: April 3, 2026 ⚠️ NLA (Not Legal Advice) ⸻ 🧾 Big Picture (Plain English) This batch of filings is all about funding the lawsuits the Trustee is preparing. 👉 Translation: •The Trustee is gearing up for major litigation •She secured outside funding (Parabellum) •Some details are so sensitive they were sealed •And importantly… 👉 There are clear signs targets are already identified ⸻ 📂 Document-by-Document Breakdown Not all docs fit in this post. See comments ⸻ 📄 Doc 2679 — Motion to File Funding Docs Under Seal 🧠 What it means (simple): The Trustee is asking the court to keep key documents hidden from the public because they contain: •Trade secrets •Litigation strategy •Confidential financial structures ⸻ 🚨 🔥 KEY BOMBSHELL (Page 3) The agreement includes litigation budgets for Meta litigation involving DTC and others, including certain parties 👉 Layman translation: •They’ve already scoped out who may be sued •The names are not public (redacted / sealed) •But the structure shows: •Specific defendants identified •Budgets allocated per case •Litigation already mapped out 💥 This is NOT theoretical anymore 💥 This is targeted litigation planning ⸻ 🧩 Why sealing matters: •There are multiple agreements + exhibits (A–G) •Includes: •Retention agreements •Budgets •Co-counsel agreements •One of the filings confirms: 👉 Entire contract filed separately under seal ⸻ 📄 Doc 2680 — Declaration Supporting Sealing 🧠 Simple: Trustee says: •These documents contain confidential commercial info •They must be sealed under bankruptcy rules 👉 Translation: “This stuff is sensitive because it reveals strategy and structure.” ⸻ 📄 Doc 2681 — SEALED DOCUMENT NOTICE 🧠 Simple: •Confirms: 👉 Actual funding agreement + details are NOT public 💥 This is where the real names, targets, and mechanics likely sit ⸻ 📄 Doc 2682 — Motion to Approve Funding (CORE FILING) 🧠 What it says: •Trustee wants court approval to formally ratify the funding deal •Legal basis: •Business judgment •Best interest of estate ⸻ 💰 KEY TAKEAWAYS: •💵 ~$11.8 million funding commitment •🔍 Investigation already underway into: •Market manipulation •Naked short selling •Spoofing 👉 Translation: This lawsuit strategy has been: •Pre-researched •Budgeted •Funded ⸻ 🧨 HUGE LINE: “Preliminary investigation into possible claims of market manipulation…” 👉 That means: •This didn’t start now •Evidence gathering likely already happened ⸻ 📊 Funding Structure (Simplified): •Parabellum pays upfront costs •If they win: •Funder gets paid first (with premium) •Then attorneys •Then estate 👉 If they lose: •Parabellum eats the loss 💡 Translation: No risk to estate = green light to pursue aggressive litigation ⸻ 📄 Doc 2683 — Trustee Declaration Supporting Funding 🧠 Simple: Trustee confirms: •Funders DO NOT control litigation decisions •This is standard in big cases •Potential to recover: 👉 “substantial monies” ⸻ 👉 Key takeaway: This is NOT a funder-run case — Trustee stays in control ⸻ 📄 Doc 2684 — Wes Christian Declaration 🧠 Simple: •Explains litigation funding model •Calls it: 👉 “leveling the playing field” ⸻ 👉 Translation: •Targets are likely large institutions •Funding is needed to go up against big players ⸻ 📄 Doc 2685 — Hearing Notice 📅 COURT DATE: 👉 May 7, 2026 @ 1:30 PM (Zoom) Judge: Gary Spraker ⸻ 🧠 Putting It All Together (Big Picture) 🔥 What these filings REALLY show: •✅ Litigation is fully planned and funded •✅ Specific targets identified (not public yet) •✅ Budgets assigned per defendant group •✅ Evidence phase already started •✅ Sensitive details are being intentionally hidden (sealed) dropbox.com/scl/fi/72hhqjp…

MMTLP: Demand Congressional Oversight & Accountability @TheRobbCarter Show on @RealTalk933FM welcomed Peter Pfeifer, the conservative candidate for the 2nd Congressional District, Missouri. Robb and Peter discussed the urgent need for #MMTLP accountability and @RepAnnWagner's inaction in supporting defrauded investors. As Chair of the Capital Markets Subcommittee, Rep. Wagner holds rare subpoena power. Why has she failed to act for everyday American investors? Wagner can subpoena critical information to uncover what happened with MMTLP and deliver transparency at the least. What is stopping her? Her core duty is to protect constituents and investors—not shield Big Finance, who deliver almost daily contributions supporting her campaign. While MMTLP investors suffered massive losses, Rep. Wagner’s net worth reportedly surged from $6M to nearly $26M during her time in Congress. She recently rose from #40 to #37 out of 535 members for net worth in Congress. Meanwhile, the national debt has ballooned to $37T, much of it under Wagner's votes. Wagner’s personal wealth enjoys rigorous oversight—why not the same for MMTLP investors and taxpayers? Pfeifer for Congress is committed to respectfully pressing Wagner for answers and action. Follow us here, visit pfeiferforcongress.com, and join Peter's campaign for transparency and accountability. Begin Transcript Robb Carter (00:00) My assessment of Ann Wagner... We have a lot of people and I know that you're involved in this too, these MMTLP people, right? So they got a hold of Peter Pfeifer (00:06) And when you say people, there's like 65,000 of them. Robb Carter (00:09) 65,000 people that had their investment stolen from them. I know they've reached out to you because you ran against Ann Wagner. They've reached out to. Peter Pfeifer (00:16) It was likely for me to reach out to them when I was campaigning against her. These people are vocal and they've been harmed and we started talking about, two years ago. Robb Carter (00:27) Now explain it to me, because I've never been in public office. I assume there's a lot of people that are pulling at you. People need things. You're a politician. They, have issues that they want you to address, but these people have been at it for almost three years. As I understand it. Some of these people were wiped out. They were telling me that military members had committed suicide because they had their entire savings in this particular stock. It's a big deal for these people. And what they're trying to do is get Ann Wagner just to simply respond to them, whether she's going to use her subpoena power, because she's the chair of the capital markets committee in Washington, DC. So they need her. It just so happens that Ann Wagner is out of Missouri is the people they need. So they reach out to me and they say, you know, what's the scoop with Ann Wagner? How do we get ahold of her? Will she respond to you? She won't respond to us. So I'm trying to get ahold of Ann Wagner to see what her take is on it, but isn't it a responsibility to communicate with your, constituents in the state of Missouri? if they had their money basically stolen from them because the regulators, I don't want to get too deep in it, were supposed to protect them. They didn't. They want to know what the situation is. Ann is the point person for it. And these people are sending me emails left and right of all the times they've communicated with Ann and they say they just can't get anything back but some blasé nonsense, but there's no communication whatsoever. Isn't that the duty of an elected representative in the state of Missouri or do I not quite understand how it all works? Peter Pfeifer (01:46) Have you ever been represented by someone in your life? Please. Okay. Well, you know, they understand what their job is, right? Right. And U S representative, it's self-defining. your job is to represent the people, the second congressional district. If you have one person in the district that was taken over the coals by the MMTLP fiasco, there should be some accountability because it's under your purview as a Robb Carter (01:50) attorneys Peter Pfeifer (02:12) United States representative to the federal government. If the SEC or FINRA or anybody is attached to the financial services committee, if you're the chair of a subcommittee. Do your job. Robb Carter (02:23) Yeah. What I keep saying. don't know. it frustrates me because I see I see too many people within the body of politics in Missouri and around the country who don't really have a lot of, they don't take a lot of responsibility for their constituents. They don't want to communicate with. Peter Pfeifer (02:39) It's only 65,000 people 65,000 people. That's it. Robb Carter (02:42) And billions of dollars just erased. Peter Pfeifer (02:44) You know how big the second congressional district is, Rob? It's 770,000 people. It's not 65,000. Robb Carter (02:51) I got a lot to get through with you. So don't go with that. Just Peter Pfeiffer, he's going to tell you all about his son of a baker. You're to tell me the whole story. We've got to get that out. That's right. Don't go anywhere. Peter Pfeiffer is joining us. Peter Pfeifer (02:59) A real Missouri SOB. Dan (03:05) You can get the voice of freedom everywhere. The Real Talk Radio Network. Robb Carter (03:10) All right. Everybody I got Peter Pfeiffer with me ran for ran for Congress against Ann Wagner. And I got a, I don't have a beef necessarily to pick with Ann Wagner and I don't know her well enough to create a beef with her, but I do want her to respond to these people from MMTLP. just think it is, I think it's her duty, but I got to get, I'm going to move on from Ann Wagner.