Isaac Silverman

499 posts

Isaac Silverman banner
Isaac Silverman

Isaac Silverman

@IsSilver

Founded & Sold Daydream (AI BI tool) Writing what I learned. Prev: @Uber, @Postmates, @Bloomnation, @Zynga

San Francisco, CA Bergabung Ocak 2008
873 Mengikuti847 Pengikut
Maria Davidson
Maria Davidson@mariardavidson·
Started dating 6 years ago today. Moved in together 5 years and 363 days ago. Thought the world might be ending back then. It turned out great!
Maria Davidson tweet media
English
7
0
74
8.5K
Maria Davidson
Maria Davidson@mariardavidson·
Special interests have captured California. Despite being the 4th largest economy in the world and having the highest taxes in the country, California is unaffordable, we don’t build enough housing, our cities are unsafe, and we’re experiencing net migration out of the state. We need to act to save California.
Eliyahu Kamisher@eli_kamisher

SCOOP: Tech billionaires are weighing a $500M war chest to counter labor unions and reshape California politics. The proposed endowment, would use investment profits for politics, and work to cement tech’s influence in Sacramento for decades. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

English
23
27
344
46.3K
Isaac Silverman
Isaac Silverman@IsSilver·
Teach an agent to fish 🐟
English
0
0
1
18
Isaac Silverman
Isaac Silverman@IsSilver·
DON'T do the work. Instead: build the (Claude) skill that does the work.
English
1
0
1
39
Isaac Silverman
Isaac Silverman@IsSilver·
@rohanpaul_ai Alt explanation is a shift in profile. Existing team not adopting AI fast enough -> seek new talent -> swap out laggards. I don’t buy this is Jevons yet (except insomuch as coding may become a part of non-eng jobs).
English
0
0
1
40
Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai·
Citadel Securities published this graph showing a strange phenomenon. Job postings for software engineers are actually seeing a massive spike. Classic example of the Jevons paradox. When AI makes coding cheaper, companies actually may need a lot more software engineers, not fewer. When software is cheaper to build, companies naturally want to build a lot more of it. Businesses are now putting software into industries and tools where it was simply too expensive before. --- Chart from citadelsecurities .com/news-and-insights/2026-global-intelligence-crisis/
Rohan Paul tweet media
English
428
1.4K
9.9K
2M
Isaac Silverman me-retweet
Siqi Chen
Siqi Chen@blader·
the same people who cheered when a guy was shot for exercising his 1st amendments rights peacefully are the same people who mourn a guy who oppressed 90 million for 40 years, rolled back the rights of women while murdering 1000s of his own people never has there been a better example of the difference between the perception of goodness vs reality of it
English
43
271
2K
38.6K
Isaac Silverman
Isaac Silverman@IsSilver·
Using AI to build products is table stakes. Using AI to build systems that build products is leverage.
English
0
0
1
17
Siqi Chen
Siqi Chen@blader·
the strongest possible evidence for the simulation hypothesis is that on the infinite timeline of the universe, you just happen to be alive at the exact moment the singularity is occurring
English
499
279
4.5K
473.6K
Isaac Silverman
Isaac Silverman@IsSilver·
@nateliason When you can do months of work in hours the bar is high to do almost anything else
English
0
0
0
40
Nat Eliason
Nat Eliason@nateliason·
Nearly every ambitious person I know who has dived into AI is working harder than ever, and longer hours than ever. Fascinating dynamic tbh. I have NEVER worked this hard, nor had this much fun with work.
English
505
604
7.6K
1.2M
Isaac Silverman me-retweet
Ben South
Ben South@bnj·
Introducing @variantui Enter an idea and get endless (beautiful) designs as you scroll No canvas, no skills or MCP, no constant prompting Reply if you'd like 200 free designs to give it try
English
2.2K
270
4.1K
1.1M
Isaac Silverman
Isaac Silverman@IsSilver·
Prediction: Edtech 2.0 includes a wave of "prestige" offerings featuring highly selective cohorts that learn together. Online education has potential to democratize the best education in human history but stigma and lack of accountability keep the category from realizing its full potential. A winning formula will combine: + Extreme Quality - Content from the world's best instructors (the internet), learning tools, and 1:1 AI mentoring + Ivy League-level network + signaling + Social accountability Most importantly, they'll rebrand Edtech from negative to neutral signal (UPhoenix) into positive signal (Thiel Fellow, Astra Nova).
Gagan Biyani 🏛@gaganbiyani

The dirty little secret of edtech: the biggest names don’t actually care if you learn anything. As co-founder of Udemy, it is something I reckon with every day… Duolingo - edtech’s only decacorn, worth $14B. Brilliant app, addictive product, and great for motivation. But let’s be honest: most users can’t hold a basic conversation in their chosen language. It’s a game, not an education. Masterclass - it’s called “edutainment” for a reason. Great brand and team. But not useful for serious learning. Udemy/Coursera opened access to millions, but video courses have a fatal flaw: they only work for the most motivated. 4-10% completion rates! I still get DMs about their positive impact, but still average person doesn’t view them as mainstream solutions to education. Kajabi/Teachable nailed creator monetization. But many (not all) creators don’t prioritize outcomes — just sales. Too many $5,000 “get rich quick” courses with spammy marketing. There are gems, of course, but still not enough quality for mainstream acceptance. Then there’s University of Phoenix, the worst offender. It proved you could tap federal student loans, deliver poor outcomes, and keep billions in revenue. Ironically, the best education models — coding bootcamps like App Academy, BloomTech, General Assembly, Galvanize — actually drove real outcomes. But they didn’t quite reach scale. In large part due to unfair (and immoral, imho) practices by the higher education cartel. Here’s the thing: everyone in this space starts with good intentions. I know the teams at Duolingo, Udemy, and others. They care. But the incentives of Edtech 1.0 pushed everyone toward engagement and monetization instead of real learning. Public investors eventually caught on. Consumer growth stalled, B2B slowed, and valuations dropped. Coursera/Udemy are each ~$700M (!!) in annual revenue, but trade at 1.5-2.5x multiples (!!). It is a hard time in edtech. We need Edtech 2.0. The next generation needs to deliver real learning outcomes AND high engagement. There’s a number of companies trying - of course I believe Maven is one of them. To build multiple $10B+ companies in education, we need to care deeply about whether people actually learn. American competitiveness is literally reliant on rebuilding our education system. AI is about to trigger the largest upskilling need in modern history. The opportunity is massive — and this time, we can get it right. It may not seem like it, but I’m optimistic. Out from the ashes of Edtech 1.0 will rise Edtech 2.0. The new generation is going to deliver value, and make people believe again.

English
0
0
0
102
Isaac Silverman me-retweet
Mila
Mila@RealWiseWords·
I think the purest form of love is just wanting someone to notice life with you. "taste this. look at that. hear this song." again and again. until you can't imagine noticing life without them
English
340
18.1K
102.3K
2.8M
Robert Leshner
Robert Leshner@rleshner·
There’s now >$1,000,000,000 in Superstate tokenized funds, $USTB and $USCC. I’m grateful to our partners, clients, and friends that have helped us reach this milestone 🥰
English
30
11
210
30.4K
alexwang
alexwang@moondrencht·
Today, we're proud to launch Wilson to the world – your very own legal superagent. Think Cursor for legal contracts. To celebrate our launch, we're giving away a month of our Pro plan for free -- comment "Wilson" and we will send you a promo code. No waitlist -- try Wilson today!
English
1.9K
290
3.9K
725.8K