John Strand

18.7K posts

John Strand banner
John Strand

John Strand

@JohnStrandUSA

The Maverick Conservative 🇺🇸 Patriot for Congress (FL-19 Republican) running to Reclaim the Republic • J6 hostage vindicated by the Supreme Court

Naples, FL Bergabung Eylül 2021
79 Mengikuti151.7K Pengikut
Tweet Disematkan
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
It’s time—I’m running for Congress in Florida’s 19th District. Biden’s DOJ targeted me—but I refused their corrupt plea deal, fought back, and WON. Now I’m taking that same fight to Washington—to drain the swamp, end weaponized government, and restore American liberty. 🇺🇸
English
866
3.6K
11.2K
622.3K
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
Ever wonder why they call it “the nuclear option”? It’s because they want you to think it’s radical and dangerous—but it’s only a self-made rule of the Senate. The truth is, it’s the NECESSARY option—and it’s not optional. Pass the SAVE Act, period.
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA

Voting in favor of the SAVE America Act is a duty of every elected official in Congress. If you do not ensure voting is limited to US citizens only, you should never have power again.

English
1
11
27
405
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
@goff_jerry68345 That’s incorrect—and absurd. The truth is simple: the SAVE Act makes it harder to CHEAT. Full stop. It must be signed into law.
English
0
0
1
7
If you can keep it
If you can keep it@goff_jerry68345·
@JohnStrandUSA John, I think it's time to tell the truth & let the voters know that this will make it harder to vote---particularly for married women. My fear is that it is wrongheaded and will disenfranchise millions of voters in both Red & Blue states.
English
1
0
0
9
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
Voting in favor of the SAVE America Act is a duty of every elected official in Congress. If you do not ensure voting is limited to US citizens only, you should never have power again.
English
12
219
861
10.1K
John Strand me-retweet
Rep. Andy Ogles
Rep. Andy Ogles@RepOgles·
America was founded as a Christian nation.
English
199
359
1.7K
24.6K
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
Did you know the U.S. Constitution requires and guarantees a republican form of government to every American citizen? I know, shocking what happens when government usurps power that doesn’t belong to them—like controlling schools—and those schools fail to teach the Constitution.
English
12
66
164
1.5K
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
You omitted the most important part: ONE NATION UNDER GOD >> JohnStrand.com 🇺🇸
English
2
1
3
38
🇺🇸J6Veteran.com
🇺🇸J6Veteran.com@J6Veteran·
@JohnStrandUSA “I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”
English
2
0
1
26
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
@Riley_Gaines_ That’s why the SAVE Act is essential, non-negotiable, and must be passed no matter what it takes! Pressure @LeaderJohnThune until he gets it done 🔥
English
5
31
197
1.4K
John Strand me-retweet
Tyler Bowyer
Tyler Bowyer@tylerbowyer·
Politics is a team sport. If you’re not working as a team, then you don’t win.
English
156
108
834
23.4K
John Strand me-retweet
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
Islam is a totalitarian ideology. Nazism is a totalitarian ideology. WOKE socialism is a totalitarian ideology. Communism is a totalitarian ideology. All of this evil influence is committed to destroying America. None of it belongs in our country. Get it out.
English
100
494
1.2K
8.2K
John Strand me-retweet
Rick Green
Rick Green@RickGreenTX·
Every word James says here is correct. Every. Single. Word. Go back and look at my speeches and posts in 2022 when I went to Washington State multiple times to campaign against Joe Kent for Congress because it was obvious he was a democrat switching just to grift and that he was not trustworthy or in any way a grounded conservative. If President Trump had endorsed Heidi St. John, the real conservative in that race, she'd have won and no one would even know who this guy is... none of this betrayal and damage to America would be happening right now.
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames

Listen you human pieces of garbage and anyone else here in the comments who wants to get this straight. First off, this isn't news. You're spreading salacious horseshit from propagandists, and we all know you're doing it on purpose and with malicious intent. That's nasty. Nasty, nasty. But now let's look at some things seriously, like you would if you had a responsible bone left in your sorry outfit. Charlie died in September of 2025. This conflict started in February 2026. Joe said this conversation happened in June 2025. Operation Midnight Hammer happened in June 2025. So we can establish that Charlie was talking to Joe in the context of Operation Midnight Hammer, but Charlie said those exact same things on camera to the world at the time. This isn't new information at all. It was always public straight from Charlie. Then Trump executed Operation Midnight Hammer, and a nervous Charlie Kirk said he supported President Trump 100%, though he didn't want a "regime-change war." He later said the operation was a success. Charlie Kirk backed President Trump 100%, even though he voiced his concerns before Trump made his decisions, both in public and in private. He supported Trump when he made these decisions and stood strongly with him, for him, and with and for the United States of America, even when he was nervous about it. Charlie's words in June of 2025 cannot be construed in any way to be applicable to the circumstances that led Trump to make these decisions in early 2026. It isn't hard to guess how Charlie would have felt about this situation, though, since he already demonstrated it for us in June last year. 1) He would be publicly and privately nervous about getting into such a war and would strongly caution against regime-change as a goal and boots on the ground as a strategy; 2) He would have voiced these concerns both on camera and in private and maintained a pro-Trump and pro-America, while "America First," messaging about the looming conflict; 3) Once things started in late February/early March, he would have backed President Trump 100% like he did on 100% of the other things he backed President Trump on 100%, 100% of the time; 4) He would have stood by the operation and President Trump's decision-making, even while voicing his anxieties, concerns, and beliefs about wanting the war/conflict to wrap up quickly and avoid boots on the ground and a deliberate strategy of regime change; 5) He would have reassured Americans that President Trump has the best intelligence, the best instincts, and the best capabilities to redefine conflict in the 21st century and to guide us through this war, consistently. To suggest anything else is to fail to have known Charlie Kirk or even to have paid attention to what he actually said in the relevant situation Kent is bringing up, standing on the silence of Charlie's coffin to do so. To tie this to Charlie's murder is nothing short of reckless and heinous, and it is likely so reckless that it will possibly interfere with bringing Charlie's murderer to justice, given the idiotic and opportunistic things he said. You are all vultures and skanks, and your judgment will be ruthless.

English
3
40
155
11.7K
John Strand me-retweet
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
The Founding Fathers were patriots. The Founding Fathers were pioneers. The Founding Fathers were visionaries. The Founding Fathers were Christians. The Founding Fathers were many things. But they were not Muslims.
English
289
2K
7.9K
86.4K
John Strand me-retweet
Eric Metaxas
Eric Metaxas@ericmetaxas·
Catholics Against "Catholics For Catholics"... The great @EberstadtMary writes on how a rogue Jew-hating pseudo-Catholic cult is confusing some actual Catholics... @GenFlynn and @MattWalshBlog have GOT to be told they are being used to divide Christians and the GOP... Every serious Catholic I know KNOWS affiliating with Candace et al. is evil. Be ye not deceived. thefp.com/p/candace-owen…
English
42
49
173
5.1K
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
@EliCraneAZ That’s precisely why I’m running for Congress in FL-19. Let’s connect! 🇺🇸
English
1
0
1
71
Eli Crane for Congress
Eli Crane for Congress@EliCraneAZ·
If I’ve learned anything in my brief time as an elected official, it’s that Congress is just as bad as it appears. We need more representatives driven by common sense, and fewer driven by power and self interest.
English
81
285
1.1K
10.1K
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
Hi, thanks for asking. I moved to Naples 4 years ago, long before @ByronDonalds opened the seat and before I had any notion of running for office. I came to defend liberty and morality—because one cannot last without the other. I’m the Creative Director at @AFLDSorg & @GoldCare, both headquartered here in southwest Florida. I don’t just ‘believe’ in the Founders’ vision of limited government and free market prosperity—I’m willing to fight for it, and to sacrifice my life and sacred honor in defending it. I chose prison over a lie—because we’re losing our country. And now I’m running for Congress in FL-19 to restore courage, common sense, and Christian values back into government. I urge you to join our movement—we have a crucial opportunity to ignite revival and Reclaim the Republic.
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA

Free speech is not a license for sexual grooming in public spaces. “Pride” has served to erode the foundational pillars of decency in our society by normalizing unconventional sexual behaviors. Sex should remain private. Public spaces should remain appropriate.

English
2
3
18
489
John Strand
John Strand@JohnStrandUSA·
I’m running for Congress in FL-19—and we need to accelerate deportations, at least TEN MILLION over the next two years. How? Simple: de-bank illegal aliens, and watch them hurry back home in short order. Basic!
English
83
495
1.9K
14.4K
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
Listen you human piece of garbage and anyone else here in the comments who wants to get this straight. First, it wasn't his office's job to do the investigation, so that's just salacious trash that should be condemned totally, not promoted like it's "news." Now, Charlie died in September of 2025. This conflict started in February 2026. Joe said this conversation happened in June 2025. Operation Midnight Hammer happened in June 2025. So we can establish that Charlie was talking to Joe in the context of Operation Midnight Hammer, but Charlie said those exact same things on camera to the world at the time. This isn't new information at all. It was always public straight from Charlie. Then Trump executed Operation Midnight Hammer, and a nervous Charlie Kirk said he supported President Trump 100%, though he didn't want a "regime-change war." He later said the operation was a success. Charlie Kirk backed President Trump 100%, even though he voiced his concerns before Trump made his decisions, both in public and in private. He supported Trump when he made these decisions and stood strongly with him, for him, and with and for the United States of America, even when he was nervous about it. Charlie's words in June of 2025 cannot be construed in any way to be applicable to the circumstances that led Trump to make these decisions in early 2026. It isn't hard to guess how Charlie would have felt about this situation, though, since he already demonstrated it for us in June last year. 1) He would be publicly and privately nervous about getting into such a war and would strongly caution against regime-change as a goal and boots on the ground as a strategy; 2) He would have voiced these concerns both on camera and in private and maintained a pro-Trump and pro-America, while "America First," messaging about the looming conflict; 3) Once things started in late February/early March, he would have backed President Trump 100% like he did on 100% of the other things he backed President Trump on 100%, 100% of the time; 4) He would have stood by the operation and President Trump's decision-making, even while voicing his anxieties, concerns, and beliefs about wanting the war/conflict to wrap up quickly and avoid boots on the ground and a deliberate strategy of regime change; 5) He would have reassured Americans that President Trump has the best intelligence, the best instincts, and the best capabilities to redefine conflict in the 21st century and to guide us through this war, consistently. To suggest anything else is to fail to have known Charlie Kirk or even to have paid attention to what he actually said in the relevant situation Kent is bringing up, standing on the silence of Charlie's coffin to do so. To tie this to Charlie's murder is nothing short of reckless and heinous, and it is likely so reckless that it will possibly interfere with bringing Charlie's murderer to justice, given the idiotic and opportunistic things he said. You are all vultures and skanks, and your judgment will be ruthless.
English
158
454
3K
192.6K
Collin Rugg
Collin Rugg@CollinRugg·
NEW: Joe Kent says he was blocked from investigating the assassination of Charlie Kirk, says the last thing Charlie told him was to stop the U.S. from getting into a war with Iran. "The investigation that the National Counterterrorism Center was a part of, we were stopped from continuing to investigate." "There was still a lot for us to look into that I can't really get into, but there was still linkage for us to investigate that we needed to run down." Video: @TuckerCarlson
English
749
669
4.5K
544.8K