@M3Writer.bsky.social

44.2K posts

@M3Writer.bsky.social banner
@M3Writer.bsky.social

@M3Writer.bsky.social

@M3Writer

Former Active Duty Marine, Current Active Duty Writer. My personal opinions & DMs with trusted allies. Blocks are generously provided to 🤡s. He/Him🇵🇷🇺🇸

Bergabung Şubat 2021
810 Mengikuti327 Pengikut
Tweet Disematkan
@M3Writer.bsky.social
@M3Writer.bsky.social@M3Writer·
This is 💯 what you should do. As some of the people who used to follow @SjwSpiderman learned, his @ was available and then co-opted by a rightwing/Comicsgate bigot and making extreme damage before they were suspended. If you leave follow these instructions. Now more than ever.
@M3Writer.bsky.social tweet media
English
3
2
11
0
@M3Writer.bsky.social
@realJaredGilman Like that’s the least relevant part of this clip, yet so illustrative of the lack of critical thinking and analysis he did to form that take. He is a very grown man to have it explained in 2026 what “motherfucker” means.
English
0
0
0
12
@M3Writer.bsky.social me-retweet
Transphobes eat sh*t
Transphobes eat sh*t@neverpilled·
Neera Tanden retweeting Sneako but telling us Hasan is toxic. They have no principles.
Transphobes eat sh*t tweet media
English
8
39
568
4.6K
@M3Writer.bsky.social
@sidhubaba @moorehn While admitting his “deeply held” and “moral condemnation” was full of shit and uninformed. But he somehow wants us to take him seriously about leadership or (lol) consider him for another presidential run. What a fucking joke of an empty suit.
English
0
0
8
222
@M3Writer.bsky.social
@SER1897 It’s amazing to me that you could write publicly and extensively about politics YET people try to conflate things you never said or wrote. I know Google isn’t as good as it used to be, but it’s still easy to see what you wrote about that AT THE TIME.
English
0
0
0
7
@M3Writer.bsky.social
Because HE released a full statement condemning explicitly someone who by his admission he knows nothing about. He could have said “I don’t know who that is BEFORE and he wouldn’t be asked about it. But Booker CHOSE to take “a moral stance” then admitted he was full of shit.
greg.@mistergeezy

Fuck you. Cory Booker doesn't owe an explanation. Has Barack Obama ever appeared on Rush Limbaugh? Why would you ask a Black US Senator to explain why he doesn't want to appear on an anti-Black platform? Are you slow? @jonlovett

English
0
0
0
38
@M3Writer.bsky.social
@jriddlecult @trouble_man90 @wideofthepost Exactly!! Saying “Sinema was a Green Party member” or “progressive” is as idiotic as when GOP say “Democratic Party was the party of slavery.” While technically correct at some point, it ignores a lot of history since and especially recent alignments. It’s dishonest & stupid.
English
0
0
1
9
@M3Writer.bsky.social
@ElectionCenter_ I think you’re both arriving at same point but with different starting point. The point Stephen is making is the left were the first to sound the alarm and oppose Sinema and it was centrist that recruited and elevated her. So this attempt to blame the left for Sinema is lying.
English
0
0
0
8
The Election Center
The Election Center@ElectionCenter_·
The left never “turned” on sinema. The left was very opposed to her even when she was in the house. She was never a progressive in congress and trying to claim otherwise is willfully lying.
Stephen Robinson (Bluesky at @playtyperguy.com)@SER1897

It was the left who first turned on Sinema and was blamed by mainstream media for "driving" Sinema out of the party. I'd think that mainstream Dems wouldn't want to keep suggesting that the "populist supported by the left" won 58.6 of the vote in a primary.

English
1
0
40
1K
@M3Writer.bsky.social me-retweet
Melanie D'Arrigo
Melanie D'Arrigo@DarrigoMelanie·
Lost in the Hasan Piker discourse is the fact that conservative Dems, backed by GOP money, are choosing to alienate young Dem voters by attacking Hasan instead of bringing those voters in by fighting for the policies they want. They are actively choosing to help Republicans.
Acyn@Acyn

Fetterman: It is crazy. You have many of my party, they are proud to do events with Hasan Piker… Democrats have to decide, whose side are you in? Are you proud to stand with that individual or Israel?

English
8
44
187
4.2K
@M3Writer.bsky.social
@Bludsprt_ You see his other thumbnails where he shows his “muscle men with photoshopped women’s faces” fetish. I’d feel sorry about his repression if he wasn’t such a scumbag bigot.
English
0
0
1
61
@M3Writer.bsky.social me-retweet
@M3Writer.bsky.social me-retweet
Isi Breen
Isi Breen@isaiah_bb·
Classic centrist thing is to spend two weeks shrieking about something and then the instant it’s clear you’re losing the issue, say “why the FUCK are we talking about this thing?”
Sarah Longwell@SarahLongwell25

This is a good take.

English
9
141
1.7K
45.7K
@M3Writer.bsky.social me-retweet
Andrew Perez
Andrew Perez@andrewperezdc·
You said Democrats are focused on Piker "because he's making their life harder." The only reason Dems are talking about him is because a centrist think tank is campaigning against him as part of its $30-50M effort to crush the left.
Sarah Longwell@SarahLongwell25

Look, the dumbest thing about all this is that I didn’t and don’t care about Piker. Piker never comes up in focus groups with voters as someone they’re following—the way a Rogan or Tucker or Candance does. I don’t think he’s singularly making an impact on politics in any way commensurate with the attention he’s getting. But I care about Tim. I agreed with @Timodc’s original point that using Piker as a litmus test is dumb. Calling up Jon Ossoff to ask what he thinks about Piker is dumb. It is an unnecessary distraction. But I felt like Tim’s discussion of Piker was too dismissive of some of Pikers more toxic positions. And that was the part I wanted to react to. There’s nothing I can do about the fact that the internet distortion field has overtaken the whole thing. And that people are debating my views in a way that is totally divorced from my actual, very-well documented views. That’s just part of what happens when doing this work. The only thing I can do is keep saying what I actually believe. And what I hear voters saying they believe. But politicians can reach voters who are angry about the Iran war and even about America’s relationship to Israel without going on the stream of a guy who said America deserved 9/11. But, it’s also no doubt true that he’s being elevated by the whole conversation and the right answer to questions about him should probably be “Piker, who?” Because that’s what most voters would say if you asked them.

English
34
236
2.1K
75.6K