TraderTrady!

353 posts

TraderTrady!

TraderTrady!

@MuskBot777

Bergabung Ekim 2022
282 Mengikuti115 Pengikut
GEX Edge
GEX Edge@GEXEdgeIO·
@nickelninjaGEX Hey Nick! Not sure what GEX tool you're using, but here's a screenshot of our dashboard at 11am ET showing a large gex zone and the top readout clearly saying to watch for rejections based on the gamma regime. Would love if you gave us a try. DM us!
GEX Edge tweet media
English
1
0
7
863
TraderTrady!
TraderTrady!@MuskBot777·
@SawyerMerritt @Tesla lol he gonna fall flat on his promises like Elon. supposed to have half of United States covered with robo taxis now… CEO These days lol
English
0
0
1
11
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe in new interview: "Later this year, we'll have full supervised point-to-point, which will be very similar to @Tesla's FSD. That will roll out to all of our Gen 2 vehicles and, of course, R2. Next year, we'll allow it to go unsupervised, so you can take your eyes off the road. The next step is achieving full capability for the vehicle to drive itself with no one in the car. We've been developing that for a while for our personal vehicles, but we also see it unlocking new business models, robotaxi being one of them. We took the decision to parter with Uber so we could focus on the tech and leverage them for their access to a big distribution channel. They're really a category of one. There's no one quite at their scale or reach." Full interview: youtube.com/watch?v=wP61dC…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
512
79
1.4K
437K
Tradable Astronaut
Tradable Astronaut@TradableAstro·
Trying to be unbiased here, but there are weird underlyings in what I am looking at $SPY
Tradable Astronaut tweet media
English
9
3
62
60.9K
TraderTrady!
TraderTrady!@MuskBot777·
@longwashere Subbed on the Patreon. Won’t you say that your performance thru this run up has been sub-par?
English
1
0
0
67
Glitch
Glitch@Glitch_Trades·
What's the opposite of Black Monday?
English
104
4
278
126K
TraderTrady!
TraderTrady!@MuskBot777·
@TLAMB91 Any chance for a new code for whop. Thanks
English
1
0
1
66
Glitch
Glitch@Glitch_Trades·
$MU bulls are hilarious 😂
Glitch tweet media
English
4
3
91
9.7K
Wolf Of Dubai 💲
Wolf Of Dubai 💲@realwolfofdubai·
$BMNR Tom Lee SCREAMS: That’s all Bottom Crash
English
8
2
40
5.3K
The ₿itcoin Therapist
The ₿itcoin Therapist@TheBTCTherapist·
TOM LEE’S ETHEREUM TREASURY COMPANY BITMINE FILES FOR PREFERRED STOCK PAYING 9.5% DIVIDEND. WHY WOULD ANYONE BUY THIS
The ₿itcoin Therapist tweet mediaThe ₿itcoin Therapist tweet media
English
58
7
193
37.6K
Jason Luongo
Jason Luongo@JasonL_Capital·
If you're under 40 and want to grow your portfolio aggressively, you need to understand how LEAPS work. A LEAP is a long-term call option with an expiration of one year or more. Instead of buying 100 shares of a stock for $15,000, you can buy a LEAP contract that gives you similar upside exposure for a fraction of the cost. Same directional bet, way less capital tied up. Example: Stock trades at $150/share. 100 shares = $15,000. A LEAP call might cost $3,000-$4,000 depending on the strike. You now control 100 shares of upside for roughly 20-25% of the capital. That freed-up capital can work for you elsewhere - selling puts, earning yield, or sizing into other positions. When you're young, time is on your side. LEAPs let you take concentrated exposure to your highest conviction ideas without locking up all your capital in a single position. The mistake most people make: buying cheap, far OTM calls hoping for a home run. That's not a LEAP strategy. That's a lottery ticket. The key is buying calls on stocks you have real conviction in, picking strikes that fit the setup, and giving yourself at least 12 months of runway. The risk is simple: the max you can lose is the entire premium you paid. If the stock drops or stays flat, your contract loses value every day through time decay. LEAPs are not a shortcut. They're a capital-efficient tool for high-conviction positions only. Comment "LEAPS" and I'll send you my free cheat sheet breaking down exactly how I use them. NFA. DYOR.
Jason Luongo tweet media
English
326
85
1.2K
159.2K
Tezlar
Tezlar@na_option·
Watching to see if we break the trendline today. If so, fill the gap at 404 and reassess $TSLA
Tezlar tweet media
English
2
0
21
2.2K
Wallstreet Dragon
Wallstreet Dragon@longwashere·
Some of you have mistaken that my account is under 25k so I have trouble with day trade calls. My accounts are WAY over 25k. I’ve turned over 80million in trading volume almost every year. What I’m referring to as day trade calls is not the same problem as the minimum 25k requirement. If you never ran into this problem is because you don’t trade like I do. I turn my portfolio over in volume 3-4x a week. I go all in with swing trades and dip out. This is how a day trade call happens and it’s a stupid loophole to restrict you from trading. >your account is over 25k, and you make 5 day trades >you’re flagged as a “pattern day trader” but you’re still “allowed” to day trade since you’re over 25k >brokers will slowly lower your allowed day trade volume or aka “day trade margin/buying power” (not the same as regular margin because you’re not using any extra cash) >when you surpassed your day trade “margin” AND because you’re flagged as a Pattern day trader, you’re not allowed to day trade anymore. Both of these statements need to be true. >if you day trade one more time they will restrict your account for 90 days from opening new positions. Even thought your account is in the millions. They will say it’s because of the PDT rule This is how the PDT rule affects you even if your account is in the millions.
Wallstreet Dragon tweet media
Wallstreet Dragon@longwashere

$hood I have lost so much money because of this pdt rule. Not the 25000 rule but the day trade calls associated with PDT. No longer will traders will have issues with deciding to take 1 day profits vs being day trade banned. This is a welcomed changed and should have never been a thing.

English
11
1
39
15.9K
Glitch
Glitch@Glitch_Trades·
Personally think in my humble opinion that $META should be the next $1 Trillion company, not $MRVL.
English
45
5
296
45.6K