🌑 Shadowed Sun ☀️

@MonkeysPaw @NotMikeHarlow You think we’re not out here trying?? LMAO.

@NotMikeHarlow Gay man here, I was in a monogamous relationship with my partner for 28 years. It only ended because he died from a stroke. You need to get out there and meet some real gay people and stop listening to stereotypes

Gay culture is poison. It is an upside-down world where anything positive and healthy is vilified, and everything toxic and self destructive is glamorized. There is nothing that is more ingrained in you than to feel shame for wanting to find a loving monogamous relationship.

@zackisnotarobot @NotMikeHarlow God forbid I want true love

@NotMikeHarlow The attempt to make open relationships the norm is horrifying, so I have to agree. Acting like wanting a monogamous relationship means you aren’t as “evolved” as they are, when they’re actually just incapable of restraint, is the gay gaslight of the century.

@RealPeterLeo @NotMikeHarlow Lmk when yall figure it out

@NotMikeHarlow I know gays who have gone from hooking up to dating or married but I haven't been able to figure that out.

@michelangeluv Gays are hornier and more passionate than straights

Men always kiss each other more passionately than when they kiss women, why that is?

@Villgecrazylady WHO THE FUCK CARES WHAT YOUR RELIGIOUS BOOK SAYS, (IF YOU’RE EVEN BIBLICAL JEWS)

“There’s no peace in the Middle East bc Palestinians refuse to believe in the Torah. The Torah says it’s our [Jews] land. And that’s why America must always stand with Israel.” Wow. He just came right out and said it.

@Garlicoyal @HeraldOfRome Yeah I can’t help you if you’re refusing to look into an entire proven field of genetics. Have a good one.

@Shadowed_Sun @HeraldOfRome No. There are no details. He just made that up...pulled it out of his ass There are no "Highest measured cognitive profiles"

The argument that Rome fell because of immigration-driven population replacement doesn't really hold up when you look at the genetic and historical evidence. 90+% of the "immigrants" into Roman era Italy were ancient Greeks, coming from the most developed regions in the world with the most educated populations. They don't really count as immigrants since they were simply moving from one Roman province to another, and in most cases they were moving into areas of Italy that Greeks had already colonized and settled centuries earlier. The difference in the Imperial period is that they were now also moving into central and north Italy. So the basic premise of a totally foreign population flooding in is already wrong. What actually happened was the opposite of the decline story. They arrived centuries before the western collapse and a millennium and a half before the eastern one, and the populations they contributed to went on to produce some of the highest measured cognitive profiles in pre-modern Europe. Once you line up the genetics, the timeline, and the outcomes, this fairy tale falls apart. 90+% of the "immigrants" into Roman era Italy were ancient Greeks, coming from the most developed regions in the world with the most educated populations. They don't really count as immigrants since they were simply moving from one Roman province to another, and in most cases they were moving into areas of Italy that Greeks had already colonized and settled centuries earlier. The difference in the Imperial period is that they were now also moving into central and north Italy. You can see their genetic contribution clearly in modern Italians, which hasn't changed much since antiquity apart from minor Germanic admixture in the north. Southern Italians (Calabria, Campania, Sicily) carry 63–67% Roman-era Ancient Greek-like ancestry. Central Italians (Lazio, Tuscany, Umbria, Marche) carry 49–56%. Even northern Italians (Lombardy, Veneto, Liguria) carry 29–33%. The same Roman-era Ancient Greek-like signal shows up at around 20% in Iberia. This is not a foreign population replacing natives because it's a continuation and expansion of a Mediterranean genetic cline that already existed. The samples from Imperial Italy, around 1–200 AD (after the big migration into Italy had already happened), were mostly Greek mixed, and scored higher on PGS EDU/IQ than other Europeans, higher even than medieval Europeans who lived 1,000 years later. So the so-called "immigrants" were still smarter than the surrounding European populations. The timeline alone destroys the argument of collapse due to population replacement. The main Roman-era migration into Italy happened around 150–50 BC. The western empire fell in 476 AD, roughly 500 to 600 years later. The eastern empire fell in 1453 AD, roughly 1,500 years later. What kind of "population replacement causes civilizational collapse" mechanism takes 600 to 1,500 years to produce its effect? At that point they're not actually describing a causal process, because when your supposed cause and effect are separated by 600 to 1,500 years with an entire functioning empire in between, they're just pointing at two distant events and asserting a connection without explaining how one led to the other. If you want to argue demographics mattered for 476 specifically, the only even remotely plausible candidate is Germanic migration, and specifically the fact that Germanic immigrants became overrepresented in military commands in the 4th and 5th centuries due to corrupt political decisions by emperors and regents. And those Germanics most likely had lower intelligence than the Italians they were displacing in military roles, since medieval samples from Germany and medieval Viking samples score lower on PGS IQ/EDU than Imperial Italian samples. But even this wasn't population replacement. It was a minority being overrepresented in military positions, not a demographic shift in Italy itself. The eastern half of the empire, populated by exactly the same Greek stock that had settled central Italy centuries earlier, continued for another 1,000 years and remained the most developed civilization for centuries after the West fell. The genetics were basically the same, yet the outcome was the opposite, which is something the hypothesis cannot explain. The actual genetic evidence, as far as it goes, points in the opposite direction. Pre-modern civilizations appear to show selection for higher intelligence and lower rates of mental disorders, not against.

@Garlicoyal @HeraldOfRome You have all the details, how about you go some some research? Look into PGS EDU/IQ scores and their respective genetic SNPs. A very widely studied field.

@Shadowed_Sun @HeraldOfRome "highest measured cognitive profiles" I almost spit out my coffee. Where pray tell, can one find the measurements of cognitive profiles?

@Garlicoyal @HeraldOfRome “Somehow mentally superior.” He cited the exact method of determining that.

@HeraldOfRome Greeks did not make up 90% of the migrants and slaves coming into Italy during the Western Roman empire. Many were Gauls, Iberians, Germans, Dacians, Numidians, Assyrians, Egyptians, etc And you seem to be suggesting that Greeks were somehow mentally superior. That's silly

@HeraldOfRome @nonregemesse Yes, thank you. Finally someone with some sense on this topic.

@cwchris_ Horrific

I mean yeah

@Frances_Coppola They’re just legitimately monsters. No other way to put it. They have surpassed the Nazis.

The people returning to their homes don't know the Yellow Line exists. But the IDF shoots them if they cross it, then labels them "terrorists". This is an outrage.

@Mistrusts @DancingEddie_

@DancingEddie_ Don't worry too much about it, 90% of so called rizz is actually getting drunk/high or talking to escorts/whores and buying them what they want. There's no value in cultivating that skillset.

as you get older, not having rizz with women stops being funny and starts being sad I’m 27 and I’ve noticed my friends find my inability with women to be less and less funny and more and more frustrating / sad very interesting results

Veteran buried his eldest and it’s not looking good for his two others. Posting for any connections, help that can be made while they fight for time.

@walterkirn One can celebrate the peace while also questioning its permanency and criticizing how we got here. If someone kidnaps you, you don’t say thank you when they release you.

Need I repeat this?

@JackPosobiec Uh, hand over the DNA evidence then?

Judge is frustrated now, asking why Tyler Robinson's team is now pushing for a 6 month delay which conflicts with the victim rights of Erika Kirk who asked for a speedy trial

@glennbeck So he lied about badly paraphrasing instead of saying he was quoting pulp fiction? How is that any better?

We are in a propaganda war. The video of Pete Hegseth “quoting a fake bible verse" from Pulp Fiction is yet another example. The original post came from RUSSIAN media and was then amplified by a Turkish psy-op account until it was picked up by major U.S. outlets. It didn't include the additional context that Hegseth said he was "badly paraphrasing Ezekiel." Outside forces are using social media to build outrage amongst the American people. WAKE UP. The war isn’t just in the Middle East. It’s in your hand every time you open social media.

@dbongino I just can’t believe what’s happened to you, genuinely insane

So weird how the Media/Swamp class, who’ve been wrong for generations on geopolitics, keep getting outsmarted by a guy they dump all day as their intellectual inferior. And next they’ll claim it’s all “luck.” It’s not. Regardless, I’d rather side with someone “lucky,” who wins, rather than zeroes who are unlucky, and lose.

@naturallymike @Georgie_KK Yes, it is exactly that. Very recognizable.

@Georgie_KK This is how I kissed when I was trying to be straight.

Someone teach him how to kiss wtf

@hughsmegma3 @StefanMolyneux Yes, this has been shocking

@StefanMolyneux Lmao. You are supposed to be a philosopher? This guy is as dumb as a box of rocks. Why do people follow you?

I'm not an asshole who punishes little kids who can't choose differently.

@MKnowlesShow @michaeljknowles This is pathetic, Michael

"This is an anti-Catholic — and coincidentally anti-Trump — op to try to split the Catholics from the president, and the president from the Catholics." @michaeljknowles breaks down the Left's efforts to pit President Trump and Pope Leo XIV against one another: