starcitycaptain 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

@RapidResponse47 I call bullshit.

@randymot4 For almost all of Europe history there has been no US bases. We will be fine. Dont let the soor hit you in the arse of the way out.

The US will not withdraw from NATO, but we will cut back the cost we incur for their defense on the ground. This will hit the local European economies hard.

@LurkingGeorge @CDNPolicyHawk You keep thinking that. We like it when we are under estimiated.

@StarcityCaptain @CDNPolicyHawk That would come across differently if you had a military.

Huh... Argentina's economy is struggling again, I take it?

@FutbolKicks @grok @UnBearAbull @sharland57753 @kevinf567 You better hope we dont become islamic. Because we would have 1.5 Billion muslims behind us. You guy couldnt even beat Iran.

@grok @UnBearAbull @sharland57753 @kevinf567 But the USA will help Argentina under the Monroe doctrine and then the Brit’s will run back to their Muslim island.

It’s not our war

@LurkingGeorge @CDNPolicyHawk Well the iranian doctrine states that the US no longer has any say in the Middle East. The Canadian Doctrine says we joim the EU if we want to.

@CDNPolicyHawk The trump correlary on the monroe doctrine is clear that overseas powers will not be allowed to have influence or control of western Hemisphere choke points. No Falklands for the UK and no Canada for the EU, no Panama Canal for China.

@timdavies_uk We wouldnt make a Movie about it, either.

No lies detected 👍😅

@RealBookerScott The US had an agreement with Ukraine to give its nukes back to russia . So it is your responsability.

When we were told by American pokliticians it was America's responsibility was to send $200 billion in cash and munitions to Ukraine to protect NATO, we did. When it was time for NATO to step up, they didn't. Not one more dime to Ukraine or NATO. ENOUGH!

@djmullen52 @Bratt_world So let me get this straight . Trump tested a DEFENCE orginisation . By ATTACKING iran. Seems like there is a problem with the test. So who failed?

@Bratt_world It was a test. They failed. He said before the war that USA sends billions to help protect Nato countries, but wasn't sure if any of them would help protect USA if needed. He got his answer.

Because NATO Allies didn’t jump when Trump said jump, he’s going to take deposits for arms purchased by other nations. First it was Switzerland, then it was the EU, and likely Canada next.

@DrWadeSmith1 @octosquixz @aravosis The Us is not in Europe just for Europes benefit . Its in Europe to project US power across the Middel east and the world. Something the Us found very hard to do when most of the EU told trump to go a do one for, attacking Iran.

@octosquixz @aravosis That is what eu/nato countries did for decades to US.

Trump has now single-hardly killed the entire United States arms industry. Every country now knows that if you buy weapons from the United States, Trump could simply decide not to send them to you. Who in their right mind would buy weapons from us going forward?

@AhmedBaba_ If it was so great why was it cancelled , It could be that paramount knew it was shit

Right-wing haters killed something that was objectively amazing. Starfleet Academy had one of the best first seasons of any Trek show. Period. These anti-woke losers would’ve had a stroke at Riker rizzing up non-binary aliens in TNG. Star Trek has always been progressive.

@DavidLeavitt You know its ok for things to be bad. Its ok for people not to like shows and it appears that these shows had somethings in common. They were bad and people did,nt like them end of story. Its also possible that you are part of a very small minority who jave bad taste in shows

Dear Algorithm, Please show me people who loved #StarfleetAcademy, She Hulk, Willow, Dark Crystal, and Star Wars The Acolyte They are my people

@TGrammie2 I do back in the 80s . I think it was when people gave dogs bones to eat.

My husband would like to know if any of you remember white dog poop from the 70's. If so, why isn't there white dog poop now?

@DannyCarrLogic @Kens_Rant @shanaka86 The morale of the story is never send a boy to a mans job.

@Kens_Rant @shanaka86 Who gives a shit, you idiots started it and have completely fucked it up, we aren’t there because Trump asked us to be, we are there to help get things moving again or us and everyone else is screwed economically

BREAKING. The country President Trump called “very late as usual” just parked a nuclear submarine within Tomahawk range of Iran. HMS Anson, an Astute-class nuclear-powered attack submarine, is now positioned in the northern Arabian Sea with cruise missiles capable of reaching targets deep inside Iranian territory. Britain did not announce this with a press conference. The Daily Mail published the positioning. The submarine speaks for itself. HMS Anson left Perth earlier this month and traveled 5,500 miles to the Arabian Sea. It carries Tomahawk Block IV cruise missiles and Spearfish heavyweight torpedoes. Its Rolls-Royce reactor will not need refuelling for 25 years. Its pump-jet propulsor makes it one of the quietest submarines in any navy. It does not need to surface to strike. It does not need permission from Washington. Starmer authorises launches through Permanent Joint Headquarters at Northwood. This is a British weapon under British command. The sequence matters. On the first day of the war, Iran fired two intermediate-range ballistic missiles at Diego Garcia, a British territory in the Indian Ocean. Neither hit. Trump publicly criticised the UK as “very late” and “disappointing” in its response. Starmer initially hesitated on US requests to use British bases for strike operations. Then Britain authorised the use of UK bases, including Diego Garcia, for operations to prevent Iran from attacking ships in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran responded by warning that British lives are now at risk. Britain responded by sending a submarine that can put a Tomahawk through a window in Tehran from underwater without surfacing. The escalation ladder from “very late” to nuclear attack submarine took less than three weeks. Starmer’s calculation is not ideological. It is economic. The UK imports significant quantities of LNG and oil through Gulf supply routes. The Strait of Hormuz carries approximately 20 percent of global seaborne oil trade. British energy prices are already surging from the Hormuz closure. British pharmaceutical supply chains depend on Indian manufacturers who depend on Gulf crude. The same supply-chain vulnerability that connects Modi’s Nowruz phone call to Ohio pharmacies connects Starmer’s submarine deployment to British gas bills. The submarine is not defending democracy. It is defending heating costs. The Astute-class is the most capable attack submarine Britain has ever built. Seven are planned. Five have been commissioned. HMS Anson, the fifth, entered service in 2022. At 97 metres and 7,800 tonnes submerged, it carries a crew of 98 in a hull designed to operate at depths exceeding 300 metres. It is smaller than the American Virginia-class but rated quieter by multiple independent assessments. It carries fewer missiles but needs fewer sailors. In a strait where stealth matters more than volume, the boat that cannot be heard is more dangerous than the fleet that can be seen. The UK is now the third nation with strike capability deployed in the war theatre, after the United States and Israel. France has the Charles de Gaulle carrier group for air operations. Greece has a Patriot battery defending Saudi refineries. Twenty-three nations signed a statement. But only Britain has put a nuclear-powered platform carrying land-attack cruise missiles underwater in the Arabian Sea with the authority to fire them on the Prime Minister’s order. Trump said late. Starmer sent a submarine. The missile it carries can reach Tehran. The reactor that powers it will not need fuel until 2047. And the man who authorises the launch is the same man Iran threatened by name when it said British lives are at risk. The threat was noted. The submarine arrived. Full analysis: open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

@KCCantiaci @Kens_Rant @shanaka86 Isnt it funny when people such a yourself point out facts. You never get a response.

@Kens_Rant @shanaka86 We’re not at war with Iran you dumb fvckwit! If the good ol’ US had it covered, we shouldn’t even need to be there. We weren’t consulted or included. The fact is Trump ‘s stupidity has endangered everyone in the region. So this is a defensive move in case we need it.

@GunterFehlinger Artical 5 is when a Nato country is attacked. Not when the country (usa) Goes half way across the world and starts it.

It’s time for Article 5 of NATO. US under Attack. NATO must join and support the Operation against the terror regime in IRAN.

@ztisdale It more likely to join the EU.

Canada is currently being absorbed by the United States via the power of economics. It's happening now. There is no way to escape it. 51st State is inevitable.

@notinthe80s @MarineF18ret @MAGAVoice Forgive my fat fingers

@notinthe80s @MarineF18ret @MAGAVoice The thing is it would take decades to create the infrastructure to able fully make everything thing in the usa and even if they do that. You have a to chose between high price inorder to pay a good wage. Or reduce your population to 3rd world levels to maje them cheap.

Dear President Trump, True Patriots LOVE Tariffs. Having other countries pay money is much better than us having to pay Sincerely, 77+ Million MAGA Patriots

@StandUpForTrmp Trump reminds me of Doctor Evil. ONE MILLION DOLLARS. Then everyone laughs at him

🚨BREAKING: President Trump imposes 10% tariffs on the following countries 🇺🇸🇬🇱. • France • Finland • Norway • Sweden • Denmark • Germany • Netherlands • United Kingdom Do you firmly support trump on this? A. Huge Yes B. No IF Yes, Give me a THUMBS-UP👍!!

@GezzaRocks @davidicke Even as a little kid. I hated him. He used to creep me out

@davidicke I remember arriving in England in the mid-80s and watching 'Jim'll Fix It' on TV. Amazingly, the guy wearing pink glasses, who to me looked like an in-your-face, skin-crawling creep, was able to 'entertain' the entire British public."

So 'King' Charles steps in over Mandelson's connections to Epstein after stripping his brother Andrew of his 'royal' (load of nonsense) title for the same reason. Well, I have a few things to say about that, Charlie boy. What about your close friendship over decades with mega-paedophile and procurer of children for rich and famous paedophiles, Jimmy Savile? You know - the mega paedophile invited into the inner circle bosom of the British royal family in the 1960s by known paedophile 'royal' Lord Mountbatten. Even FBI documents exist as testament to the open secret of what Mountbatten was. Yet Mountbatten was the acknowledged 'mentor' of Charles and his father Prince Philip - another close friend of Savile until they fell out. Charles even used Savile as a 'go-between' with Princess Diana when their sham 'marriage' was breaking down. I detail in my 1990s book, The Biggest Secret, how a close friend of Diana for nine years told me that Diana said she couldn't stand 'sleazy' Savile and that the royal family were 'not human'. The same friend told me how the royals were a hybrid human-reptilian bloodline that I had established by then through many other sources. That's a whole other story that connects into who is really running the human world. No wonder they wanted rid of Diana. The question is (which answers itself) why the 'royal' family was not investigated when Savile died in 2011 and his rampant paedophilia was revealed. It's clear that the police knew about his 'activities' and are we really to believe that the royal Protection Command of London's Metropolitan Police didn't know? Do we believe that known paedophile Lord Mountbatten didn't know?? So, the 'royals' knew. What was a mega-paedophile and procurer of children for the rich and famous (the Cult network including former Prime Minister Edward Heath) doing in the inner circle of the 'royal' family?? The same family which, through Andrew, connects into the Epstein network (same global paedophile/Satanic network, just a different branch). It does make the holier-than-thou actions of King Charles look like stunning hypocrisy. Some other questions: Why did ‘royalty’ exist in the first place? Why were they considered ‘special’ bloodlines worthy of automatic rule over the populace based on who had sex with who in what order, or which of them could seize power over the other through brute force? Why are the remaining ‘royals’ in countries like the UK, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Spain, etc. all connected? See The Biggest Secret for the detailed background to the British ‘royals’ and ‘royalty’ in general, and my latest book, The Road Map, for how it all fits together. The highly detailed story of the British ‘royals’ and Savile is in my book, The Perception Deception: shop.ickonic.com/collections/bo… gbnews.com/royal/king-cha…