Steven Smith

@paramounttactcl @ladybistre The question is, which governments intel agency is running this operation?

🚨The Joe Kent, Tucker, Candace, Megyn Kelly - The NEW RIGHT PSYOP Let me break this down — it’s obvious once you spot the pattern. This whole thing is being smuggled in by exploiting American war-weariness and painting Israel as the root of all our problems: 1. Force MAGA to lose the midterms by stoking division and fracturing conservative Christian voters (Zionism vs. anti-Zionism). 2. Completely end the MAGA movement by 2028, paving the way for a full Democratic takeover. 3. A “New Right” emerges 2028–2032 with this core platform:
• Anti-Israel & anti-Jewish
• Secretly pro-China, pro-Russia & pro-Islam 
• Extreme isolationism that lets all the above operate with total impunity — accelerating America’s decline as a superpower. I’ll be going in-depth on this live at 7:30pm tonight. Join me.

@Disco_Missiles @AGHamilton29 @ShawnRyan762 This statement is so fucking ridiculous I had to read it twice to make sure you actually wrote it.

@libinterpreter @AGHamilton29 @ShawnRyan762 Is 60% enriched uranium forbidden? Illegal? Is it an indication of a weapons program? (All the answers are no, btw)

So this is actually a very instructive example of the entire issue of the conspiratorial podcast scene. It would take exactly 2 minutes of research to know everything @ShawnRyan762 says here is objectively wrong. See next post for the explanation.

@Disco_Missiles @AGHamilton29 @ShawnRyan762 Never mind, I did not realize you were retarded, sorry bro. Maybe get some help.

@Disco_Missiles @dkavillio6 @AGHamilton29 @ShawnRyan762 60% enriched uranium is only for weapons. They are a state sponsor of terror. The IAEA said they had it. They are the largest state sponsor of terror in decades. What part confuses you?

@dkavillio6 @AGHamilton29 @ShawnRyan762 Let's do some true/false questions: 1. Iran had enriched uranium for 20+ years, T/F 2. Possessing enriched uranium is legal, T/F 3. Iran never had a nuclear weapons program, T/F 4. After 2025, Iran quit enriching, T/F 5. Iran offered to give up its enriched uranium, T/F

@Disco_Missiles @AGHamilton29 @ShawnRyan762 Also, 60% enriched uranium is only for weapons. They also brought in Libyan and Pakistani experts to help them with the program. You have cognitive dissonance or are wilfully lying.

@libinterpreter @AGHamilton29 @ShawnRyan762 Imagine using a foreign source for events happening in foreign countries, lol. What needs to be backed up? Iran had enriched uranium but no weapons program, tracked for 20 years. After 2025 Iran stopped enriching and in February offered to give up their enriched uranium.

@Disco_Missiles @AGHamilton29 @ShawnRyan762 You never did answer if you are part of the same op as them? Were you AirForce intel?

@Disco_Missiles @AGHamilton29 @ShawnRyan762 That is not what everyone else is saying. They said a lot of shit and it was never true. They always lie and weak minded fools like you actually believe the largest Muslim terrorist country we have ever seen. I actually feel bad for you. Pathetic.

@ledermanu @ShawnRyan762 Shawn is deeply entrenched in the same operation as Kent. It will be a love fest interview to push out the narrative they have been told to.

@ShawnRyan762 you better ask him the hard questions.. not the bobble head BS he is used too with all the other BLACK PILLED morons.. push on his timelines for all this..

Joe Kent returns to the Shawn Ryan Show. Watch the episode live on Monday, March 23rd at 3PM CST. srs.site/JoeKentLIVE

@ShawnRyan762 Clearly, we can all now see this as a psychological operation. The question is, Shawn, who is running the operation you are part of?

@AntiWokeMemes Multigenerational inbreeding and they are doing the work of satan!

Why do they look so angry and ugly?

@AGHamilton29 @ShawnRyan762 I think it is a psychological operation being run by either a government agency (foreign or domestic) or a well funded group trying to take down Trump. It seems very coordinated.

@AGHamilton29 @Disco_Missiles @ShawnRyan762 Interesting you use a foreign source for your claims, then can not back them up when called out. Are you also in on the psyop?

@Disco_Missiles @ShawnRyan762 Show me where Tulsi Gabbard claimed Iran wasn’t enriching or admit you have no idea what you’re talking about and make stuff up…

I’m noticing you noticing @ShawnRyan762 - Chag Kasher V’Sameach. 👀👀👀

@JoeMabok @ShawnRyan762 I believe it is an op. I wonder which intelligence agency is running the op.

@ShawnRyan762 Now tell us about the marine barracks in Beirut and all IEDs in Iraq and Afghan. You’re compromised

“USS Liberty was an intelligence gathering ship off the coast of Egypt. Israel bombed it and killed Americans, saying it was a mistake and that they thought it was an Egyptian ship. It was flying American flags, and Israeli jets flew over it multiple times to identify it. They strafed it, dropped bombs on it, and the ship called for help saying we’re being attacked. It is the one and only time in history that another country has directly attacked a United States vessel and there was no repercussion.” @MichaelTLester

@ShawnRyan762 Lay of the SSRIs the VA has given you. They are destroying your already weak mind.

@GBNT1952 @davetv28 Shaw Ryan is part of the OP. The real question is, which intel agency is running the OP?

Lol what a joke… Yes, Israel mistakenly attacked one of our ships almost 60 years ago, immediately took responsibility for the attack, apologized, and paid restitutions to all of the families of the affected Service Members in attempts to right the wrong. What more would you have them do? We have accidentally killed many allied troops in our history as well, including Canadian, British, French, and other NATO members in multiple fratricide events, will you hold us to the same standard? This is straight slop propaganda from Shawn and he knows it. It’s insane that he is pushing this nonsense. Act like a warrior and stop being a sniveling propagandist. Embarrassing…

@sarahadams How can you still work for Shawn Ryan when it appears he is part of an operation to blame everything on Israel to hurt the elected president of our country?

Al-Qaeda on the Defensive: Messaging, Misdirection, and Mounting Losses On March 17, 2026, Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) released a formal statement in Kabul responding to Pakistani Military airstrikes conducted between March 16 and 17. The statement is significant not just for what it says, but for what it attempts to conceal. AQIS framed the strikes as an attack on civilians, claiming Pakistani warplanes targeted a “drug rehabilitation center” and caused mass casualties. This claim is misleading and part of a deliberate information strategy. The actual target was a Taliban weapons depot containing AQIS weapons, located in close proximity to the facility referenced in their statement. By centering its narrative on the civilian site, AQIS is attempting to redirect attention away from the loss of its own operational assets. The group’s messaging follows a familiar al-Qaeda playbook. It blends religious framing, claims of civilian harm, and accusations against those fighting them, portraying in this case the Pakistani military as acting on behalf of the United States and Israel. The irony is that there are members of Hamas inside a dozen al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan. This is likely not something they want to highlight, particularly to Israel, as Afghanistan is where Hamas is working to reestablish its presence. The AQIS statement, which I have attached here, repeatedly invokes martyrdom, frames the conflict as a “proxy war,” and positions AQIS as a defender of the Afghan Taliban and the broader Muslim population, even as al-Qaeda and the Taliban are among the groups causing the most harm and deaths to Muslims in the Pakistan–Afghanistan border region. This is not just rhetoric. It is a calculated effort to mobilize support, shape perception, and obscure battlefield realities. The statement also signals alignment with the Taliban, reinforcing a unified front against Pakistan and, frankly, the rest of us, while laying the groundwork for continued escalation. By invoking external actors and alleged ties to Western influence, al-Qaeda, using its AQIS affiliate, is attempting to broaden the conflict narrative beyond the immediate strikes. They are testing the waters to see how AQIS messaging resonates, then will amplify their media efforts accordingly. But the operational reality tells a different story. These strikes are not isolated, and they are not limited to just the Taliban or the Haqqani Network. Pakistani military operations are now impacting multiple layers of al-Qaeda’s presence, including its Afghanistan-based networks, its core senior leadership infrastructure, and key affiliates such as Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU). One of al-Qaeda’s primary external operations training sites has been targeted, a site that was central to its U.S. homeland plotting, along with several weapons depots tied to the group's broader operational planning. This reflects disruption at a structural level, not just a tactical one. There are also clear indicators that al-Qaeda is absorbing significant losses. Foreign fighters are being moved into hospitals using Afghan identification to mask their identities and obscure casualty figures. At the same time, the group has accelerated burial practices, conducting rapid interments of foreign operatives to limit visibility into the scale of fatalities. These are not the actions of an organization operating freely. They are the behaviors of a network under pressure and actively attempting to conceal the extent of that pressure. For years, al-Qaeda operated in Afghanistan with near-total freedom of movement, training, and coordination. That environment allowed the group to rebuild capabilities, strengthen external operations planning, and deepen ties with regional affiliates. What is happening now represents a meaningful shift. This week has been the most significant blow to al-Qaeda’s presence in Afghanistan since the strike that killed Dr. Ayman al-Zawahiri in July 2022. Unlike that operation, which removed a single leader, these strikes are targeting infrastructure, logistics, and weapons sites simultaneously. Viewed in this context, AQIS’s statement reads less like a position of strength and more like a reactive narrative. It is an attempt to control perception at a moment when operational realities are moving in the opposite direction. Al-Qaeda is not simply issuing a statement. It is adapting under pressure, absorbing losses, and attempting to hide the full extent of the damage. Let's not let them!

@Loralyn28954790 @keepcalmnowdude @WassonWatch Yes. Not technically, our ally, we did not even want to sell them jets because we did not want to piss off Egypt, and why was the Liberty there? They were watching Israel troops' movements and we were afraid of them crushing entire divisions of Egyptians. Educate yourself.

@libinterpreter @keepcalmnowdude @WassonWatch Not technically our ally? You are sadly mistaken, but forgiven. Likely have no memory. Had you been born? I was born in 1955 so I was only 12 years old but my parents were news junkies, always discussed at the dinner table. I remember.

"Now do the USS Liberty." Every time Israel comes up, someone mentions the USS Liberty. Hey, even when Israel is not the topic, people bring it up. A lot of folks see it as some kind of ace-in-the-hole that proves without a shadow of a doubt that Israel is a raging enemy of the United States. So, yeah, let's talk about the USS Liberty. The USS Liberty was a US Navy technical research ship, which was sailing in the Mediterranean Sea near the Sinai Peninsula on June 8, 1967, two days after the start of the Six-Day War, in which Israel was attacked by a coalition of Arab states including Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Lebanon (so all of its neighbors). It was mistakenly attacked by Israeli forces, which mistook it for an enemy Egyptian ship. The attack resulted significant casualties for the US Navy, including 34 killed, 171 wounded, and the ship heavily damaged. Here's the story: Several days BEFORE the war started, the Liberty was ordered to proceed to the eastern Mediterranean to perform signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection in international waters near the north coast of Sinai, Egypt. They were initially provided an allowable closest point of approach (CPA) of 12.5 nautical miles (NM) from Egypt and 6.5 NM from Israel, but once the war started they sent follow-on messages increasing those distances to 20 and 15 NM respectively, and again later to 100 NM from both countries, BUT DUE TO INEFFECTIVE MESSAGE HANDLING AND ROUTING, THESE MESSAGES WERE NOT RECEIVED UNTIL AFTER THE ATTACK. So, the USS Liberty sailed right into the middle of a heavy, active war zone because of poor communication. This was a critical, deadly mistake, leading to the opportunity for further mistakes. Between 0545 and 0940 the Liberty was spotted multiple times by different Israeli aircraft, and was marked on the Israeli Central Coastal Command (CCC) control table. However, the Liberty was on the move, and at 0545 it had started at 70 NM from Gaza, and later it was about 20 NM from Arish (on the northern coast of Sinai). With the movement of the vessel, and multiple hours without any sighting, it was removed from the CCC control board 1100 due to the positional information being considered out of date. At 1124 it was reported that Arish was being shelled from the sea. This may have been due to exploding munitions that Egyptian forces had set on fire during their retreat. Israeli torpedo boats and aircraft were dispatched to the area. Multiple reports were sent back about the Liberty, and it was unfortunately not identified as a US vessel at that time, and there were reports about other vessels coming through at the same time, which may have also been mixed up with reports about the Liberty. Based on the available information, Israeli forces believed the USS Liberty was an Egyptian destroyer. At 1400 two Israeli Mirage III fighter jets were given permission to engage. They strafed the ship with their 30-mm cannons and rockets. In addition to killing as many as 8, and wounding 75, this initial attack unfortunately severed the ships antennas, and knocked down the flag, making accurate identification of the ship even less likely, and slowing the ability of the ship to communicate. Over the proceeding 90 minutes there were several more attacks from the air and sea, resulting in significant damage to the Liberty and its crew, before the ship was positively identified as the USS Liberty at 1530. At 1600, two hours after the attack started, and 30 minutes after its conclusion, Israel informed the US embassy in Tel Aviv that its forces had mistakenly attacked a US Navy ship. At 1640 the Israeli torpedo boats (which had been involved in the attack) returned to help, but were refused. Later Israel also provided a helicopter to fly US naval attache Commander Ernest Carl Castle to the Liberty. Within hours apologies were sent by Israeli Prime Minister Levi Eshkol, Foreign Minister Abba Eban, and charge d'affaires Ephraim Evron to President LBJ. Within 48 hours Israel offered to financially compensate the victims and their families. This was a tragic incident of friendly fire, which is unfortunately all-too-common in war. Some have suggested over the years that it was an intentional attack by Israel, but there's simply not evidence to support that position, while there is significant evidence to the contrary: - As soon as Israeli forces positively identified the Liberty, they ceased the attack, and immediately apologized - Both the US and Israel conducted investigations afterwards concluded the attacks were not intentional - NSA transcripts later showed that the Israeli personnel communicating about the ship believed it was Egyptian - The attack happened while Israel was being attacked by multiple enemies, and was literally defending its very existence, which meant decisions had to be made quickly without all of the available information One point some have made is that survivors of the attack felt like it was intentional. And that's their prerogative. Getting shot at doesn't feel good. It feels intentional, whether it is or not. In the instance where the USS Liberty was getting shot at, at that point it was intentional in the sense that the Israeli forces did not know they were American, but believing them to be Egyptian, they were trying to kill them. But the fact is, many people who experience friendly fire report feeling it is intentional. And as I mentioned previously, friendly fire events are all-too-common. Here are just a few you might not be aware of: 1. Operation Cobra, Normandy, July 25, 1944 (World War II) - USAAF Eighth Air Force bombers mistakenly bombed US positions near Saint-Lo, France, killing 111, and wounding 490. 2. Gulf War, February 26-27, 1991 (Operation Desert Storm) - Multiple friendly fire incidents occurred resulting 35 Americans killed, 9 British killed, and 72 Americans/22 British wounded across 17 ground and 10 air incidents. One notable incident involved a US A-10 firing Maverick missiles on British armored vehicles. 3. Sicily Campaign, July 11, 1943 (World War II) - US anti-aircraft gunners fired on a formation of US C-47 transport planes carrying paratroopers of the 82nd Airborne Division, downing several aircraft, and killing between 23 and 37 troops (estimates vary), and wounding at least 60. War is Hell, and friendly fire is part of that Hell. Multiple errors led to the USS Liberty being attacked, but the biggest was the failure in communication that resulted in the Liberty sailing right into the middle of an active warzone. That error cannot be underplayed. However, the USS Liberty incident is a far cry from the "headshot" argument for why Israel is an evil enemy of the United States. Using it as such as frankly childish. It's baseless. And it's quite easily refuted if you simply look at what happened and weigh the evidence rationally. Haters will read this and call me a "Zionist Shill" who "got the phone call" and on, and on, and on, but the truth is I just care about the truth. And no amount of baseless insults will ever change that. SOLI DEO GLORIA

@ClearyTex @ShannonJoyRadio @TheMilkBarTV Because she is a narcissistic low IQ clown who is doing the work of the devil. Period.

@ShannonJoyRadio @TheMilkBarTV Character assassination is not an argument, if you disagree with her , tell us why exactly

Omg so priceless. 😂😂😂 @TheMilkBarTV counts how many times Candy references herself vs. God at her Catholic conference in DC. I cannot even ——->