
No way! On what occasion would you wear this?
Between Provinces
7.9K posts

@makeitBUtiful
Harmed patient since the early 90's. Aspiring journalist and advocate (yes, you can be both). Not going to stop fighting for us💕 Between Provinces. All TRUTH.

No way! On what occasion would you wear this?



"Come join our police service!" they said. "It'll be fun and rewarding" they said. 9 years AFTER resigning: (Someone please describe this as anything other than epic institutional failure)

AI bots will be more human than human




#BREAKING: Ontario police clear 3 cops accused of lying at trial that followed officer’s death cp24.com/local/toronto/…

Last long one for a while. People keep telling you OPP investigations are “independent.” I’ve dealt with this exact situation, a Chief’s Complaint, and here’s how it actually played out. A Chief’s Complaint in Ontario is when a police chief triggers an external investigation into internal officer conduct, handed to another service to 'appear' independent. July 2018, I was given recordings made by a civilian source. Those recordings included Matt Skof, then president of the Ottawa Police Association, discussing an undercover investigation with a civilian and making serious allegations about others within the system. They also included direct allegations against El-Chantry, a member of the police service board being involved in organized crime, and that Chief Bordeleau and his senior management team had conspired to obstruct justice in another OPP Chief Complaint investigation into a Superintendent. Towards the end of July, I released the first recording on a Friday afternoon. The timing was deliberate. By now I'd been playing this game long enough to know how they cover and conceal wrongdoing. I needed the Chief to call a Chiefs Complaint. I knew there was a Police Services Board meeting on the Monday. A Friday release showing Skof had been revealing detail and especially the way he talked about El-Chnatry would force an in-camera meeting on the Monday. The plan was simple, force the issue into the open and trigger that Chief’s Complaint. You can't withdraw a Chiefs complaint once it's called. That was my goal. Monday came and while the Board was in camera, I released the additional recordings and alerted the media. Some three hours after, the Chief came out of the in-camera meeting and announced a Chief’s Complaint and that he would ask the OPP to investigate the recordings, not knowing of the new releases. At that moment, the public impression was clear - this would be an independent investigation into serious allegations. Right? That’s where things changed. The recordings didn’t just involve Skof. The new recordings contained allegations about the others, including the claims of obstruction of justice involving the Chief and the rest of senior Ottawa police management. Media began asking questions about those broader allegations. The Chief, caught off guard, offered no comment of course. In August 2018, I was served with a cease and desist from an Ottawa law firm, Caza Saikaley LLP, funded by taxpayers, demanding the recordings be removed form YouTube. I took them down from YouTube, but left them up on LiveLeak. There was no mention of LiveLeak. There was no follow-up. Then, about two months later, the assigned OPP investigator contacted me. Wanted to interview me on tape. Sure. I had no issue with that. But I asked a direct question: Would the investigation extend to the other allegations captured on the recordings, including potential obstruction involving senior management? His answer was clear. "I've been instructed to investigate Skof only, and nothing else." I asked for clarification, specifically about senior management and the obstruction allegations. He confirmed he had specifically been told not to go there. And that’s the issue with these independent investigations. The scope of this investigation was set from the top. Selective investigation. When serious allegations are captured on recordings, you either investigate all of it, or you don’t call it independent. Skof was charged with criminal breach of trust and obstruction of justice. 6 Years later, when Ottawa police had assumed everyone had stopped paying attention Skof pled guilty to a provisional offense under 'information and privacy laws.' That means the Crown had to withdraw the charges in front of a Judge with explanation. Then lay the new Provisional offense in front of a Judge with explanation, and Skof went and paid his fine. No criminal record. He effectively got a speeding ticket for blowing the cover of an undercover operative. He was able to retire with his full pension. Meanwhile, the broader allegations captured in those same recordings were never examined. Never even looked at. Here’s the pattern - - recordings emerge - serious allegations are captured - the institution moves quickly - lawyers move to contain - the investigation scope is narrowed - one individual is dealt with - the rest is left untouched - the public is told the system worked I want to tell you the system didn’t work. But it really did. It worked to protect those in power from scrutiny, or even charges of criminality. A real independent investigation doesn’t cherry-pick the safest target, a scape goat, and ignore the rest. If recordings contain allegations touching a union boss, an undercover file, a board chair, and senior management, you would expect them to investigate all of it. They didn't, and that's not accountability. It’s containment. It's pretense. It's fucking wrong. You think the recent OPP investigation into Toronto was 'independent,' or do you think it followed the same investigative standard as this one? I'm not saying it wasn't, but if I had to go off my personal experience ... #police #ocrruption #onpoli #canpoli







