Tweet Disematkan
Nilon
4.8K posts
Nilon
@nilonlino
I like rockets / aspiring Titans Space Industries pilot
Bergabung Haziran 2021
200 Mengikuti96 Pengikut
@kmh @AeroBigMike Naturally, it's a development program.
Also, I was talking about cost and cadence, also, not once did I mention Starship.
English
So by 2028, NASA is going to cancel a sure thing (SLS) at 2.2bil a pop to instead fund another rocket that’ll cost… 3bil (or up to 3.6bil in 2030).
Noting that developing a new launch system to replace SLS will cost more than just using SLS, which will drop in price over time.
Marcia Smith@SpcPlcyOnline
NASA budget req cancels SLS and Orion after Artemis III and creates a "Commercial Moon and Mars Infrastructure and Transportation" line item with $864 M in FY26, $825 M in FY27, $2.3 B in FY28, $3 B in FY29 and $3.6 B in FY30.
English
@AeroBigMike Factor in launch cost and cadence and you get your answer.
English
@nilonlino The only way a new replacement system can be developed and launched & be cheaper than just using SLS, what’s available right now-
Is for the dev cost & production cost of the new replacement to be less than 2.2bil; what SLS alone costs.
English
@AeroBigMike Why do you act like spending 2.2 billion on top of 23 billion is the same as spending 3 billion on top of 6 billion?
Also, why do you act as if they're offering the same capabilities?
English
@nilonlino Where did I say SLS cost that much to develop? Strawman much?
English
@kmh @AeroBigMike That is what was supposed to be happening, however it is hard to keep it up when inflation continually makes your rocket more expensive and you keep having delays and cost overruns.
English
@nilonlino @AeroBigMike SLS is in serial production, every rocket launched will be cheaper than the last.
English
@AeroBigMike @AstroPnoy SLS love to pretend that this is some big gotcha but always fail to remember that the only reason it's true is because of SLS in the first place.
English
@AstroPnoy Many seem to be under the impression that by the time A4 rolls around that magically a new SHLV will be ready or even more ludicrously- a new lunar capsule.
Neither is happening before 2030.
English
"commercial entities will now take over NASA crewed lunar missions"
And which commercial entity would THAT be?
Toby Li@tobyliiiiiiiiii
Just in - the Trump administration proposes the cancellation of NASA’s SLS rocket after Artemis III and the Lunar Gateway space station. To transition the Artemis Program to have more sustainable lunar exploration, commercial entities will now take over NASA crewed lunar missions and Gateway hardware will be repurposed for other missions. This is all in an effort for NASA to beat China back to the Moon as the nation is preparing to land astronauts on the Moon before 2030.
English
@Juan123445_ @S_527Scire @AusSyndicalist @The_Swole_Nerd Area is not volume. 80% of the reduction happened during communist rule. Furthermore, it was impossible to stop the process after it was kickstarted.
English
@lazerphaze73032 @GoodVibePolitik Tell me you're historically illiterate without telling me you're historically illiterate en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation…
English
@GoodVibePolitik it's merely historical fact. soviets put nazis in the ground, and the US put them in fucking nasa
English
@AlexBeyman @DovPreminger @el_fodongo Jupiter has wind speed of over 320 km/h, any balloons or airships are getting shredded.
English
@DovPreminger @el_fodongo Get a load of this warmie who doesn't know about the Jupiter aerostat colonies
English
@ramlaen1 @deltaIV9250 Also how the time dilation is massively exaggerated.
English
@deltaIV9250 Interstellar requires you not to think too hard about things like their having a craft that can make multiple SSTO without refueling (let alone having any apparent fuel tanks).
English
Was going to write a lengthy message about this. Not really worth it. Extremely disappointed in how the RGV brand is being handled.
RGV Aerial Photography@RGVaerialphotos
Jumping onto the trend! This is what Starbase would like from the air if it was Ghibli style: @grok
English
@badchoripan @ARealNeighbor @buckadeath You know WWII didn't happen only on the western front right? And the ramifications it had went far beyond the battlefield.
English
Soviets could've soloed Germany, Western Front made no difference and was cynically timed to race the Soviets to Berlin.
🏛 𝐒𝐭𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 🏛@nonregemesse
Which opinion about history will get you like this?
English
@badchoripan @ARealNeighbor @buckadeath Also the idea that the allies were merely a sideshow in the war is a complete lie, not even considering the lend lease but also how the US production massively outnumbered the USSR one in nearly every single metric.
English
@badchoripan @ARealNeighbor @buckadeath And that's not counting all the tanks, artillery, food, telephone cables, planes, fuel, raw materials, etc which definitely played a big role aswell.
English
@badchoripan @ARealNeighbor @buckadeath That is not something most attempt to answer because it's impossible to.
English
@badchoripan @ARealNeighbor @buckadeath A non aggression pact with a secret clause to split up Poland yes.
Also that deal which the UK and France "rejected" was actually because of Poland, since it would have allowed the soviets to put troops inside Poland, something which was rejected by them.
English