Arghor

@jontheless4347 @Smultronnos @NotEvolution1 Also, it depends what you mean by logic. If you mean the classical laws of logic, then yes. They are definitely human dependent. If you mean a way of structured reasoning then no. Structured reasoning is unavoidable.

@AlexV960 @Smultronnos @NotEvolution1 @Alexv960 "Logic is just a human way of thinking" Are you saying logic "only" exists in the human mind(s)?

Literally atheist dogma:

@jontheless4347 @Smultronnos @NotEvolution1 Except again, you haven't demonstrated a dilemma because even if w accepted both of your flawed premises, the conclusion doesn't even follow 😂😂😂

@Smultronnos @AlexV960 @NotEvolution1 The Atheist dilemma--Cooked

@jontheless4347 @Smultronnos @NotEvolution1 Minds are brain/matter bound. If you change the brain, you change the mind, so actually, dirt or matter does think if it's sufficiently complex. No, structures don't imply design at all, they imply a pattern. Is semantics the best argument you have?

@Smultronnos @AlexV960 @NotEvolution1 "Logic" requires a mind and an ability to think. (Dirt or matter) doesn't think. "Structures" implies design. I think you're stuck.

@jontheless4347 @Smultronnos @NotEvolution1 What I'm saying is that logic is a set of rules we previously agree to in order to be able to talk about anything. Logic is a presupposed framework, not a universal set of rules that everything in nature must follow. There are even different types of logic we invented.

@TedLogan1010 I would genuinely want to know, what would it take to show you the photo is real? If your answer is something like "it has to look flat", then you just admitted you are presupposing your conclusion and you don't believe it based on evidence at all.

NOT REAL..

@jontheless4347 @Smultronnos @NotEvolution1 The first one, because logic is just a human way of thinking. The second one, because it's a category error stated as some sort of meaningful comparison. And the conclusion, because it doesn't follow from the premises. Literally all the parts of your syllogism are a mess.

@Smultronnos @NotEvolution1 • ​P1 Logic is objective and universal. • ​P2 Matter itself is not "logical"; it just exists. • ​Conclusion Therefore, the source of logic must be an Objective Mind (God) rather than just a byproduct of shifting atoms. Which premise or premises do you disagree?

@jontheless4347 @NotEvolution1 You misspelled "theist". It's without the a at the start.

@NotEvolution1 When you ask atheists a logic question about origins of ANYTHING.

@NotEvolution1 Except literally no atheist ever has said the universe created itself. A lot of us say it's uncreated. Not that it created itself. If your dumb ass thinks that's the same, then how did your god create itself before they existed?

@ApoloJedi_ Yeah if I were you I would try and make the case that Evolution is compatible with Christianity, because only 1 is backed up by science and it’s not Christianity.

Evolution is incompatible with Christianity.

@Randy912541093 Says the moron that literally disproved himself with his own source. First law of flerf.

@AlexV960 Stay Stupid...Globetards find you charming

Pseudoscience theories are statements, beliefs, or practices that claim to be scientific but are incompatible with the scientific method. Globetards seem to be confused about REAL Science and Reality

@Randy912541093 Once more, your stupidity misunderstanding Piccard doesn't make him a retard like you. He knew the Earth was a globe. "Seemed" is not a statement of what something is, is a statement of what something appears. Something can look like something it isn't. Learn English.

@AlexV960 x.com/Randy912541093…

@Randy912541093 Brother, sorry to say that if arguing from the level of an idiot is what we are talking about, you have tons more experience than me and most of the people in the world on that 🤣🤣🤣

@Randy912541093 Lol. Flat Earth is literally the definition of peak stupid, so it's actually impossible to get any dumber than that. I'm afraid you are once more projecting or getting confused due to how utterly moronic you yourself are.

@AlexV960 You have achieved 100% MK Ultra Compliance...AKA Peak Stupid....

@Randy912541093 "Seemed" aka, "Looked like". That's not the same as claiming it was you retarded moron. As always flattards have 0 understanding of words in context.

@AlexV960 youtu.be/vNJ-jznNTjY Dr. Auguste Piccard: First man to see the flat Earth? “..flat disk..”

@Randy912541093 Literally none of your idiotic criteria was met, lol. Flattards just can't think in the least.

@AlexV960 Thanks for identifying yourself ...#11.

@Randy912541093 No, we live on a spinning ball as per 4 of the 7 "real scientists" you named. So by your own criteria, the real scientists know the Earth is a sphere, so whats your retarded excuse then besides being a retard yourself?

@AlexV960 We live on a spinning ball as per our MK Ultra Training...and these Hollywood Celebs are biological women...I get it now ...Thanks for the advice...

@Randy912541093 No, that's the flattards. You are pretty confused my guy.

Why do Globetards lie about Tesla ...all the time ???? aap.com.au/factcheck/tesl…

@AboveZero4 @BrockRiddickIFB Meanwhile flatties be like….

@AlexV960 @BrockRiddickIFB Globies be like...