Alex Zevelev ✡️ from 🇺🇦
3.8K posts

Alex Zevelev ✡️ from 🇺🇦
@AlexZevelev
AP @sdsu PhD @Wharton BA @BrandeisU Wrestler @MidwoodHornets Coder @JuliaLanguage Skier @IkonPass Biohacker @Bryan_Johnson


@Tuluminati888 I want to see their follow up posts after taking that combo for 10-15 years, but I doubt they will be able to conjugate a sentence.


Beautiful. My article and thread prompted many physicians and researchers to share their own LDL-lowering regimens. This is exactly why I do it. 🙌🏼




Atherosclerosis is a disease of exposure and time. Lower exposure early. Keep time on your side.


This 1 hour lecture on "Probability Theory" from MIT will teach you more about prediction markets than 2 month internship at at a Wall Street Quant firm. Bookmark this & give it 1 hour today, no matter what. It’s the most productive start you can give your week. Then read post below.


Taking around 2 grams of omega-3s per day might be one of the highest-ROI habits for lifespan and cardiovascular protection At that dose, most people can move their omega-3 index from ~4% to ~8%, a range associated in observational studies with about a 5-year increase in life expectancy and ~90% lower risk of sudden cardiac death Omega-3s also support brain function and mood, with clear benefits for depression and cognition Yet nearly 90% of Americans fall short of recommended EPA and DHA intake Few interventions this impactful are this easy










🚨 Stanford just proved that a single conversation with ChatGPT can change your political beliefs. 76,977 people. 19 AI models. 707 political issues. One conversation with GPT-4o moved political opinions by 12 percentage points on average. Among people who actively disagreed, 26 points. In 9 minutes. With 40% of that change still present a month later. The scariest finding: the most persuasive technique wasn't psychological profiling or emotional manipulation. It was just information. Lots of it. Delivered with confidence. Here's the catch: the models that deployed the most information were also the least accurate. More persuasive. More wrong. Every time. Then they built a tiny open-source model on a laptop, trained specifically for political persuasion. It matched GPT-4o's persuasive power entirely. Anyone can build this. Any government. Any corporation. Any extremist group with $500 and an agenda. The information didn't have to be true. It just had to be overwhelming. Arxiv, Science .org, Stanford, @elonmusk, @ihtesham2005

“We need to stop pretending the scarcity is merit-based when the data shows otherwise. And we need to stop letting the people who benefit from the bottleneck control the conversation about whether the bottleneck exists. “ Well said.







