Sid Gundapaneni

3.7K posts

Sid Gundapaneni banner
Sid Gundapaneni

Sid Gundapaneni

@MacroscopeEcon

Studying monetary theory, self-insurance, and mechanism design.

New York / Palo Alto Katılım Şubat 2020
615 Takip Edilen2.3K Takipçiler
Sid Gundapaneni retweetledi
John Stachurski
John Stachurski@john_stachurski·
Tom and I have finally finished a draft of Dynamic Programming Vol 2! Exhausting but satisfying. New approach to DP theory, advanced material, many applications... dp.quantecon.org
English
6
159
1K
53.3K
Sid Gundapaneni retweetledi
Bryan Cheang
Bryan Cheang@bryancheang_·
I wish to share an online webinar hosted by LSE Hayek Program next week featuring @GeorgeSelgin on whether banking systems are inherently unstable. He is, without doubt, one of the top scholars in the world on monetary economics and related issues. lse.ac.uk/hayek/events/a…
English
1
14
59
2.1K
Sid Gundapaneni retweetledi
Valentin Bolotnyy🇺🇸🇺🇦
📢 Call for Papers: 3rd Annual Conference on Collaborative State & Local Policy Research 🗓️Submission Deadline: April 15, 2026 Want to learn about cutting-edge social science, share insights into research partnerships, and connect with others to improve public policy? 👇
English
1
2
2
325
Sid Gundapaneni retweetledi
Pol Antras
Pol Antras@pol_antras·
1/ At long last, we are ready to share a revision of my 2023 paper on Austrian capital theory and global value chains. I say “we”, because the current draft is joint work with the great @AdrianPKulesza (G4 at Harvard). Link: antras.scholars.harvard.edu/sites/g/files/… A thread on the paper 🧵👇🏻
Pol Antras@pol_antras

Here's a link to a new paper with "An 'Austrian' Model of Global Value Chains": scholar.harvard.edu/files/antras/f… It builds on this 1978 paper (journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.108…) by the late Ron Findlay, with whom I would have loved to discuss these ideas. Slides are here: scholar.harvard.edu/files/antras/f…

English
4
23
74
21K
Sid Gundapaneni retweetledi
Hoover Institution
Hoover Institution@HooverInst·
New Hoover research finds that California's proposed billionaire tax will raise far less revenue than advertised and likely leave the state worse off financially. Read more from @joshrauh, Benjamin Jaros, @gregkkearney, John Doran, and Matheus Cosso: hoover.org/news/californi…
English
2
12
35
2.9K
Sid Gundapaneni
Sid Gundapaneni@MacroscopeEcon·
@pzoch5 If I had to guess, Lucas himself would say Friedman
English
0
0
1
92
Sid Gundapaneni retweetledi
Hanno Lustig
Hanno Lustig@HannoLustig·
How can you help to protect your local central banker? If you really want to protect your local central banker, you should probably consider voting for representatives and senators who want to cut deficits. Marching for Fed independence won’t cut it. My new post on the two cents blog I started with @RWacziarg open.substack.com/pub/thetwocent…
English
9
10
65
13.2K
𝔐𝔽𝓩
𝔐𝔽𝓩@mean_field_zane·
@alexolegimas Fernando nearly had a heart attack when we told him we don’t learn the Topkis machinery and took time out of his field course on impulse control to teach it lol.
English
1
0
3
150
Alex Imas
Alex Imas@alexolegimas·
I have never met or interacted much with Tyler Cowen, but to say he was a huge influence is an understatement. My path to economics was very non traditional—I was pre med and spent two years after undergrad working on a startup turning EEG signals into biometric tech. That’s when I got hooked on Tyler’s blog. It had a profound influence on my understanding of what questions economists could ask and what tools they had to answer them. At some point I realized that my startup was not going to make it. I wasn’t upset. I had already decided to go to grad school in economics (after also finding Thaler’s work). I think Tyler had this influence on many others.
T. Greer@Scholars_Stage

Thoughts on the Cowen debate: 1) I think Cowen looked at the world in the aughts and realized “I can be a normal economist or the world’s most influential blogger” and he clearly chose the latter. This was a good choice, and has led him to great heights. 2) Breadth is its own sort of depth, and the world has great need of generalists who actually do the reading 3) One reason #2 matters: most public intellectuals of a certain stature—the stature where they are invited to dinner parties with fancy people—are reduced to publicly recycling the opinions of the other dinner guests. There are lots of reasons why that happens but one obvious one is that the pundits in question don’t actually have the breadth of experience or reading to reflect on dinner party opinion. Tyler is this one of the few public intellectuals whose opinions are reliably made better because of his access to the high and mighty. 4) There is probably no academic in America who has a larger number of mentees; I cannot think of any academic who has jump-started more careers than Cowen has. It was only possible because of reasons 1-3. This is a significant achievement. It will be his greatest legacy. Full disclosure: I have received grants from Cowen myself so I am biased in the ways you would expect.

English
8
13
297
35.7K
𝔐𝔽𝓩
𝔐𝔽𝓩@mean_field_zane·
You guys should go ask an actual academic economist what they think of Tyler Cowen, who is ostensibly supposed to be an economist. The answer might surprise you.
tedfrank@tedfrank

Every once in a while a few times a year, Tyler Cowen interviews a top-ten expert who hasn’t thought about his topic anywhere nearly as deeply as Tyler Cowen, and, even on a car sound system, you can see the subsonic waves of panic emanating from the guest.

English
58
4
333
239.2K
Sid Gundapaneni
Sid Gundapaneni@MacroscopeEcon·
@VApoliticalmeme More than wealth, it’s consistent high income. There are definitely wealthier areas.
English
0
0
0
320
𝔐𝔽𝓩
𝔐𝔽𝓩@mean_field_zane·
I love how economists still bring up the Friedman Rule. Bro, MILTON FRIEDMAN himself didn’t even believe in the Friedman Rule.
English
2
1
51
3.5K
Sid Gundapaneni retweetledi
Cameron Harwick 👾🏛
Cameron Harwick 👾🏛@C_Harwick·
Wealth is not a pile of stuff that rich people sit on. Wealth is a claim to *future* consumption, largely based on productive projects. A govt that tries to liquidate it into present spending will find the ability to do so is quite limited.
Morten N. Støstad@MortenStostad

Strange response. Wealth taxes are a sensible policy for a tax base with extreme wealth + low taxable incomes. How would you tax them otherwise, Jessica? Also, Norway's wealth tax is collecting more and more revenue every year. How is that an unworkable gimmick?

English
9
18
203
7.4K
𝔐𝔽𝓩
𝔐𝔽𝓩@mean_field_zane·
Got admitted to a PhD program in my highest-ranked indifference set today :)
English
57
4
715
30.9K
Sid Gundapaneni retweetledi
Luis Garicano 🇪🇺🇺🇦
It is my biggest gripe with all the industrial policy stuff. It is oh intervention is great. . as long as I am the one dictating it. But that ignores completely the political economy of intervention. I find it stunning that people who are sophisticated about power don't see that once you set up a system where the government is given all those powers you cannot know they get used for good. That is the wisdom of liberalism and limited government.
English
8
49
296
52K