Codacx
1.4K posts

Codacx がリツイート

@AdamFulwell_ Lol what, I don’t think this was even his best goal this season
English

🚨BREAKING: Pedro Neto will NOT be banned for the 2nd leg. [@JacobsBen]
English

@ryanator109 I stayed up until 1am, right before it was meant to start and thought nah
English

Glad I slept instead of watching this because I would’ve fallen to sleep anyways 😭😭
Chelsea FC@ChelseaFC
English
Codacx がリツイート

@Boy_Teegee Against Spurs. But no lie it was the worst hat trick ever scored. Man should’ve had about 6 goals that day.
English


@happy_badesha @tragicbirdapp Neither, they don’t get this hot usually. Thunderstorms every day up those ways also. This would be further west / a lot more inland.
English

@LinkofSunshine Planes aren’t regularly going down but it can cause the Pilots to get temporarily lost. Pretty crazy stuff, might be catastrophic one day. Hope this helps
English

Just once per gw from now on because second fall in same GW (or second change in general) needs tons of transfers
Codacx@Codacx
@LiveFPLnet Are you expecting him to drop two more times , before game week 19?
English

@LiveFPLnet Are you expecting him to drop two more times , before game week 19?
English

Okay I now have a working theory that would explain why Bruno didn't fall at -200%, then had his second fall now at -30%. I know it's easy to just assume manual intervention but that doesn't make sense now with first refusing to make him fall, then now let him double fall..
The special rule (which all predictors weren't aware of, apologies) has to do with Bruno rising first within the same GW.. It didn't happen before in my predictions time that a player rose first then fell same GW..
His first fall was treated as a "2nd change in the GW". The mistake here is that predictors assumed that thresholds increase only if the 2nd change is of the same nature as the first. Like a 2nd rise is always more difficult than the 1st, a 2nd fall is always more difficult than the 1st. But looks like trying to fall after a rise still activates a bigger fall threshold, so it's about the 2nd "change" rather than the double fall or rise. If that's true, he would have been at -65% instead of -200% on Monday.
Then once he fell once, that fall negates the rise and it's as if he never changed at all!! So his "1st change" small threshold kicks back in -> That would put him at -110% today..
My intuition after studying price change data for a long time tells me this rule is true. Whether it is true or not, sorry again for all the Bruno surprises this week.
English

@Codacx Always feel that Chelsea defence is a minefield but he’s played a lot recently and a great price too!
English

Wesley Fofana hit 7 DEFCON in the first 7 minutes.
I think that’s comfortably a record! 😂
#FPL
English

@Codacx Knew there would be an owner around here somewhere aha! Class!
English




















