Maylthieu Barbe

8 posts

Maylthieu Barbe

Maylthieu Barbe

@FastCrux

参加日 Kasım 2020
47 フォロー中1 フォロワー
Harry.
Harry.@CryptoHarry_·
I agree to this proposal, my only concerns are: 1. $aUST holders pre-attack should receive equal (or more) when compared to $UST holders post-attack. 2. $aUST holders has to include users in protocols like Pylon. $LUNA and dev proportions are pretty fair IMO.
English
104
32
296
0
Maylthieu Barbe
Maylthieu Barbe@FastCrux·
@WhiteWhaleTerra If Pyllon users could vote it would be healthier and easier. In addition, Pyllon users are long-term users.
English
0
0
0
0
BackBone Labs Hub
BackBone Labs Hub@BackBoneLabsHub·
@IncioMan Quorum is 30% because there is a large amount of capital being managed, so we need a high threshold in order to prevent takeover bids. Regardless, even if quorum was set to 20%, you would still have the same situation... people tend to wait til the last minute to vote.
English
1
0
6
0
Maylthieu Barbe
Maylthieu Barbe@FastCrux·
@Route2FI I disagree, I think the arbitrage on the aUST-UST pool is losing the 20% of APY of Anchor.
English
0
0
1
0
Route 2 FI
Route 2 FI@Route2FI·
New stablecoin strategy: Let's say you have $10K 1) Put $5K in Anchor 2) You get 4290 aUST 3. Go to loop.markets --> Farm 4. Find aUST-UST and provide liquidity with $5K + 4290 aUST 5. You get $20% APY on $5K aUST & 31% APR on aUST-UST Total: ~41% APY with low risk
English
189
419
2.9K
0