JSONmaxxing

Elon Musk is a trillionaire but it’s def the people on SNAP ruining your life

Our inquiry report proves that without doubt there is an undeniable link between religion and the rape gangs. Islam. As a country, we need to find the courage to finally say so.

Rupert Lowe says his report proves "without doubt" the rape gangs are linked to Islam. Here is where that word actually came from. Three things he isn't telling you. One. The "87% Muslim names" figure isn't his inquiry's research. It traces to a 2018 article by Christian Concern — an evangelical advocacy group. Not a research body. Christian Concern co-founded a leadership academy with the Alliance Defending Freedom — a US Christian-right legal group with a budget over $100m a year. Two. The "95%" figure isn't data. It's the personal estimate of one imam — who once campaigned to ban the burka. One opinion. Printed as a finding. Three. The claim that the religion itself is the cause comes from "eight theological factors." That framework was written by Mark Durie — an Anglican priest. Published by Christian Concern a month before Lowe cited it. Durie's field is linguistics. His book argues Islam gives non-Muslims three choices: convert, submit, or the sword. He didn't study the gangs and find Islam. He's argued Islam is a threat for twenty years, then applied it. Strip out the advocacy group, the one imam's guess, and the priest with a fixed thesis. What's left? No mechanism linking the faith to the crime. Only the ethnicity pattern the Government's own audit found locally — and said could not be applied nationally, because the data doesn't exist. His own report admits the scale is "impossible to quantify." Then names a faith of two billion people. Beyond doubt. That isn't a finding. It's an advocacy paper. Broadcast by an MP as proof. Stand with the victims. Question the men profiting from them.

A Russian frigate reportedly opened fire with warning shots on a British yacht in the English Channel.

Shockingly, Chris Rufo-style "Heritage American" Anglo ethnonationalism is wildly unpopular among voters. Like legalize-meth-level unpopular.

In 1968, while teenage Red Guards beat their professors to death with clubs in Beijing courtyards, Jean-Paul Sartre sat in Paris calling Mao's Cultural Revolution a model of revolutionary democracy. The most celebrated intellectual in France looked at a country burning its own libraries and saw liberation. He sold the Maoist newspaper La Cause du Peuple on French street corners himself, holding it aloft like a sacrament. Consider what he was endorsing. Between 1966 and 1976, the Cultural Revolution killed somewhere between 500,000 and two million people. Schools shut down across the entire country. Students dragged teachers onto stages, hung placards around their necks, forced them to kneel on broken glass, then murdered them. The historian Bian Zhongyun, vice-principal of a girls' school in Beijing, died on August 5, 1966, beaten by her own students with nail-studded clubs. Sartre called this the people governing themselves. You should understand why a man this intelligent got it this wrong. Sartre believed knowledge served power, that truth was whatever the revolution required, that the individual existed to be dissolved into the collective will. So when Mao abolished the distinction between teacher and student, between expert and mob, Sartre cheered. He had spent decades arguing that bourgeois reason was a class weapon. Here was a regime taking him at his word and clubbing the reasoners to death. This is what economic illiteracy buys you. A university, a price, a contract, and a peasant's grain stockpile all carry knowledge that no central planner can seize or replicate. Mises explained the calculation problem in 1920. Hayek explained dispersed knowledge in 1945. Sartre had access to both and chose the dunce cap of the collective instead, then handed out its propaganda on the Rue de Rennes. He died in 1980, mourned by 50,000 followers, never having retracted a word about Mao. The professors of Beijing got no such funeral. They got a ditch, and a philosopher in Paris explaining that their murder was freedom.

🇵🇱⁉️ Guy fails to apply basic logic and loses his car to a train. WTF is he even doing? I didn't understand what his plan was.

Japan Airlines' CEO is taking a 30% pay cut after cabin crew on a flight were drunk, causing a delay The CEO, who was once a flight attendant herself, has cut her pay three times in the last year over staff alcohol incidents