Tater Thot Hotdish
18.7K posts

Tater Thot Hotdish
@Nicky7282
🔞 Engages with politic/sci-twitter while retweeting boobs.


Woah Buddy! Insane LEGO Corruption! The American Fork Police Department just "accidentally" released 50gb of unredacted Body Cam footage reguarding Reckless Ben and Bricks and Minifigs, but deleted it to late before the internet grabbed them. In the media dump the Joshua Johnson asks to see the legal court papers but the officer refuses to show it to him because it would count as a legal service and says it would "place him in a bind" This police department, Joshua Johnson and Ammon McNeff are all toast. I've never seen the internet unanimously come together in unison on anything like this in my life.

"Lets get these douchebags off of his property...oops probably shouldn't have said that." More crazy LEGO scandal bodycam footage from the American Fork Police Department as one of the police officers reveal he's friends with the AirBNB owner that Reckless Ben is staying in. I don't know how Bricks and Minifigs will ever recover from this. Do you guys think Joshua Johnson, Ammon McNeff and Brandon Best realize how bad it is for them?

I am going to go long on this later, but my conclusion is that Bricks & Minifigs unambiguously has the law on their side, but nonetheless deserves every single bit of hate they are getting from the internet. The law clearly allows them to take this guy’s Legos and I hope they go bankrupt.



CEO @AmmonMcNeff explains the situation on body cam from the @afpolice body cam footage. This explains it all.




Everyone should have got a lawyer early on. Scorched earth seldom leaves winners, just survivors. BAM should have cut a check, said we don’t know what happened to the items, but the liability transferred to us when we took over. Public magnanimity is worth more than$200k and press like this. @BAMmemphis


BAM is trying to frame the case as: “Ben lied, harassed us, defamed us, and made people think we stole LEGO.” That is the loud story. But the quieter legal pressure point is: before anyone can know whether Ben’s statements were false, the court has to know what actually happened to the LEGO. That means records. The key questions are: • Was there a real signed consignment agreement? • What exact LEGO sets were part of it? • Were those sets ever at the store? • Were they sold? • If sold, who sold them? • Was Bryan paid? • Did BAM corporate know about the consignment? • Did Baker/Josh/Brandon receive any of those sets? • Does the POS system actually match the alleged missing sets? So the legal lens is: Truth/substantial truth beats defamation. If Ben said, basically, “they stole / mishandled / covered up a LEGO collection,” BAM has to show that was false. But if the accounting records are incomplete, unsigned, unclear, or missing, then the case has a problem before it ever gets to “YouTuber drama.” The reason the images matter is they show BAM’s own filings mention: • an unsigned/purported consignment agreement • refused/missing business records • archived and incomplete POS records • unclear inventory categories • inability to confirm specific products sold • then a TRO about posts/videos/takedowns So the argument is not “Ben is automatically right.” The argument is: BAM wants the public to focus on speech. But their own filings show discovery should focus on accounting. That’s the pressure point. #legocucks #lego #bricksandminifigs #utah













