Pra Cha

Months ago, I wrote that this year would be a year of convergence. I have been all over the place — from control systems to complexity science, from agent-based simulation to satellite deep learning and oceanographic modeling, from consulting to research to leadership, and more. My career has been deeply interesting in that sense, almost like a complex system itself, exhibiting emergent behavior over time. It takes patience and a certain depth of understanding to truly appreciate such a journey. I am writing this as a reflection, partly to calm myself, because I have been going through a difficult phase before this convergence could fully take shape. Now, I feel like I can finally see the surface. I find myself viewing problems from a far more systemic/mechanistic perspective, rather than through the narrow, dictionary-search mindset or the rigid playbook approach often used for textbook or bootcamp-style problems. Cheers.

@cneuralnetwork Stanza living Koramangala 5th block! Neat, Affordable

hello please help me find a stay (flat/pg) for 2 months near HSR/Koramangala for my internship Will stay with my college friend

@fit_fr_nothing tipping point moment for indian tpot 😂, summa porapokkula suu nu sollirukkan…

@PraCha98 x.com/i/status/20453…

Surprisingly I've already blocked all the accounts in that tweet. Maybe nikita should hire me to clean indian slop tech twitter

I had the opportunity to interact with Prof. Yann LeCun @ylecun during the AiX Summit in New York City today. As someone who has been following Prof. LeCun’s work on energy-based models, particularly JEPAs, along with Pearlian causal inference for quite some time, I am working on an intersectional idea inspired by the recent Causal-JEPA paper and related discussions. Prof. LeCun’s keynote also emphasized unified problem-solving through the JEPA architecture for complex systems, which is an area I have been deeply interested in. With JEPA, the potential to develop solutions across different scales of complex systems—from biological to financial systems - becomes more promising. It feels like various frontier things are converging towards complex adaptive systems.

@Vanireddy111 No more a reality

#DataAnalyst #DataScientist #BusinessAnalyst #MLEngineer #GenAIEngineer

Memory is an evolving system for any entity or agent. It begins with some static aspects and improves over time. The question is: how does it actually evolve? Functional information (by Szostak) may help us understand this process. We tend to retain, or an agent needs to retain, the information with high functional value—the kind of information that can be used to produce desired outcomes. So, as self-evolution unfolds, the functional information contained in memory should also improve or increase. In line with the second arrow of time as a principle of evolving systems, functional information increases when a system is subjected to selection. This leads to think about how self-evolution and memory go hand in hand, and how functional information can help explain that relationship. The next challenge is to understand how to quantify or map the functional information of memory. I am just trying to understand and build memory for self-evolving agents from first principles.

One can build memory for agents based on their tastes and first-principles grounding.

@divyanshifr True, cuz too diverse a mindset will always cause loneliness at times.

Bangalore has the most social yet the loneliest people I have ever seen

@fit_fr_nothing 🧐🧐

There is no bigger joy and learning for me than nerding out with a bunch of techies with varied backgrounds and divergent outlook. Tech argument needs to have data points or deep dive and address the underlying human sentiment that exists beyond the reach of data points

Over time, through months and years of learning, an individual absorbs and encodes a vast amount of information, including a considerable amount of what I would call functional information. By that, I mean the kind of knowledge that is not merely theoretical or passive, but usable — the kind that allows a person to perform specific tasks, make decisions, solve problems, and create outcomes. We read extensively, attend classes, watch lectures, consume educational material, experiment, and work through real situations; through all of this, we accumulate far more capability than can ever be neatly expressed on paper. This raises an important question: how can hiring and talent systems truly compare, contrast, and understand the functional information of an individual? In practice, everything gets compressed into a one-page resume or a short profile. But how can such a compressed artifact genuinely represent the depth, range, and context of what a person knows and can do? More importantly, how do these systems validate functional information from such limited signals? I often wonder whether existing hiring systems are actually good at this at all. Very often, they seem to overlook context, reduce people to shorthand markers, or sometimes fundamentally lack the ability to perceive deeper capability beyond standardized credentials and familiar narratives. On the other hand, this also leads to a personal question: how should one acquire functional information in the first place? Should a person optimize for the immediate context of hiring, almost like overfitting learning toward interviews, resumes, and role-specific expectations? Or should the acquisition of functional information be oriented toward long-term outcomes — toward building enduring capability, judgment, adaptability, and the ability to generate meaningful work over time? I think this tension is central to how individuals shape their learning journeys. And then there is the question of leadership and evaluation. Should leaders rely on collective narration — commonly accepted signals, institutional labels, prestige markers, and shared assumptions — as filters to identify talent and functional information? Or should they work to develop their own taste, their own judgment, and their own ability to detect genuine capability beneath the surface? Perhaps the deeper challenge is not only in how talent is presented, but also in whether evaluators themselves are equipped to recognize real functional depth when it appears in unfamiliar or unconventional forms. At its core, this is not just a question about resumes or hiring systems. It is a question about how modern institutions perceive human capability, how individuals should prepare themselves, and whether our systems are built to recognize real substance or merely the most legible version of it.

world models are the natural solution to complex (adaptive) systems.

AIX @ NYC

Contex engineering is finding the functional information! - reading times second arrow

@VaibhavSisinty Like selling someone’s second brain?

Second brain as a service can be a next big thing.

Anyone attending AIX at NYC this morning?

@techNmak Isn't this so random? At least a set of 10 papers should collectively help in building mental models and understanding in one specific direction or a unified view on AI.

If I were starting AI from scratch in 2026, I’d read these 10 papers first 👇

@shguke got it

@PraCha98 slowed down a bit rn but at Atari rn

being able to work in the sun is the ultimate privilege

Yeah, it's weird and also a reason for not getting internships. like why would he need an internship(but thats part of this program) I have worked for 6 years and 7 months in a full-time role (data scientist/ML Eng) — when I quit my job, I was a senior ML engineer at Informatica and joined Columbia for my Master's. I was also leading (fractionally) the AI team of a startup, building 0-1 of the AI practice and models/training/deployment for medical document synthesis. Now I am deep diving into different paradigms of ML/DS — causal inference, probabilistic modeling, RL, DL. To put it simply, I am in the transition phase from applied ML engineering to applied research/research engineering in frontier AI labs (that's my north star for this journey) — working on a series of papers and trying to collaborate with some labs too. I have also taught Applied ML and Data Science for various online edtech platforms and led engagements worth multi-million dollars in terms of tech and delivery. So I have enough understanding of the entire landscape. Also, I don't believe in interview prep but one has to explore based on their curiosity. You can learn more about me: pracha.me/musings