

QuantumFair (✨🎡_🎡✨)
405 posts

@QuantumFair
Launch your own onchain raffles powered by @API3DAO QRNG ⟁. Coming soon! 🎡



Optimism Retro Funding has a new rule that will change the builders landscape on OP moving forward. Optimism just released a new rule for projects eligibility for Retro Funding. Badgeholders will have the right amplify or outright exclude Non Open Source projects. This new rule should be much more controversial with extended substantive debate. Example: @Uniswap V3, which changed DEX landscape single-handedly used a BSL (restrictive license, which gives devs time until code goes open source) Under Open Source Initiative definition Uniswap use of BSL license would be considered “closed source”. If Uniswap was dependent on OP, it would run the risk of receiving 0 retro funding! Revolutionary product’s like concentrated liquidity may not have been built under this framework. Thus, developers building cutting edge tech (like Uniswap team) who sought temporary competitive edge with BSL before going full Open Source would be shunned away from Optimism Retro Funding. We don’t have a crystal ball, but this at least adds more questions than clarity to teams seeking to build long term products on Optimism.



"If you're a building a project that's bringing demand for the Superchain blockspace... your job is simple, show your project's impact." -@MattLosquadro from @synthetix

Show your impact, but note that voters will have the option to exclude it with one click if you’ve got so much as a single line of code in your repo that requires any kind of permission to reuse.









