StrategicHash

I think about this a lot. The business model of @MetaDAOProject is genuinely elegant. Throughout the entire history of markets, one truth has remained constant: high-quality assets trade more frequently than low-quality ones. MetaDAO’s first revenue-accruing mechanism, the futarchy AMM, captures this dynamic perfectly. It will hold the majority of liquidity across all ownership coins and take a small percentage fee from every trade. If you believe that ownership coins enforce a higher standard of asset quality (which by now seems quite evident), then it naturally follows that MetaDAO is positioned to accrue significant revenue in the coming years. While a smaller share of total revenue, the futarchy AMM will also automatically arbitrage between spot and decision market liquidity, creating additional yield revenue. Beyond that, I’m confident there are multiple future monetization paths waiting to be unlocked and new business models that will build on this foundation over time. The market for high-quality assets and sound decision-making is measured in the trillions. MetaDAO is the only place where true ownership and global high-quality internet native assets will be born. Now it’s a matter of assigning probability of success, % market capture, and % take rate. The ticker is $META and it's the next Bitcoin. Think in years, not days. Store-of-value is cool, but have you heard of number-go-up technology? futardio

@ownershipfm @MetaDAOProject Let me in

Introducing the Ownership Community A place to chat about @MetaDAOProject, futarchy and ownership, and get updates on Ownership Podcast Join: → t.me/ownershipfm Disclaimer: To minimize bots and scams, members will need to be approved before getting access to the channel

@MetaDAOProject @metaproph3t @metanallok @robinhanson Robin Hanson's research works have directly led to multiple profitable businesses (uniswap, polymarket, kalshi). I fully expect the market to pass this if it means metadao eventually builds a killer futarchy use case.

🚨 New Proposal 🚨 @metaproph3t and @metanallok have proposed the funding of a six month academic research engagement at George Mason University led by @robinhanson to rigorously study futarchy. Read the full proposal and trade it below ⏬

@8bitpenis @vibhu @bl8_runner Most price discovery happens on derivatives markets even in tradfi. These posts from @vibhu and @bl8_runner are alarming and signal defeat to hyperliquid. Need perps volume on solana to outcompete HL

@vibhu @bl8_runner Hyperliquid has a shit spot market and a great derivatives market but yes, obviously i believe in permissionless finance too, i want everything onchain i think the fact that solana is bringing all these assets onchain is amazing, so i really support thst

Contrarian and admittedly biased thesis: The long term game to win in crypto is spot, not perps. Perps is volume king. Looks impressive but is often reflexive and hollow. Tons of arb, leverage cycling, etc. and not ultra high value. Spot is the network state/economy builder: native assets enable lending markets, LP pools, payments, neobanks, wallets, and many other composable use cases (inclusive of perps btw). Asset gravity > Trading velocity

@mmdhrumil @ArcherExchange_ Okay this is so cool 🔥

Introducing Hybrid Markets on @ArcherExchange_ Hybrid markets offers both maker prioritization on Solana AND are composable with all of DeFi at the same time

@armaniferrante @Zcash @Backpack Nice.

You can now on/off ramp from USD banks around the world into @Zcash on @Backpack

Taking the other side here. Bullish MetaDAO. The Nouns comparison misses what's actually being built. Nouns lost +$30M to rage-quit forks and burned $26M on frogs, donuts, and proposals where people just vanished with funds. Classic token voting with zero accountability. MetaDAO replaces voting with decision markets. You trade on outcomes, not vote on vibes. Bad proposals get crushed by the market. Manipulation is economically self-defeating because informed traders take the other side. The Ranger ICO is the best proof this actually works. Price crashed, team allegedly misrepresented metrics. In any traditional DAO, investors get destroyed. Instead, the community opened a liquidation proposal and it passed. $5M in USDC returned to holders at $0.82/token. ICO investors who held made 2.8% while the entire market dropped 30%. The ones who got hurt panic sold. That's not lighting money on fire. That's investor protection that actually worked. Traction is strong. Drift using it for grants. Jito for fee-switch decision. 96 proposals across 14 orgs. $2.51M protocol revenue in Q4 2025. Attempting futarchy at scale is one of the most ambitious governance experiments in crypto right now. It's healthy to have contrasting views internallly. That's what makes an IC worth having. Bullish futarchy and metadao

The super power of markets is that all markets are semi strong form efficient. Metadao productized that superpower.

@TheiaResearch I̶n̶c̶r̶e̶d̶i̶b̶l̶e̶ Number-go-up technology

Okay so Ranger ICO - Launched at $0.800 - Revenue went to 0 immediately post launch - Ongoing disputes about who said what etc. but ICO investors who held ACTUALLY MADE MONEY (2.8% while entire market dropped 30%) Tokenholders Rights powered by MetaDAO

MetaDAO will have a higher DPI than 1kx

@metaproph3t Agreed

@sacha @pet3rpan_ True. Number go up tech.

@StrategicHash @pet3rpan_ it's simpler than that x.com/sacha/status/2…

MetaDAO projects resemble Nouns DAO, my favourite onchain reality tv show where people light money on fire in public and argue about it

@MiladyBonkle @TrustlessState We'll argue for hours and this debate will end with you learning how you can actually verify solana on cheap hardware on your home internet connection and still fit all of finance. But Ethereans aren't ready for that reality check. Solana executes.

@StrategicHash @TrustlessState Solana executes on what? Tell me what the Solana blockchain has delivered that Ethereum hasn't but needs to

David Hoffman appears on my feed now and then exclusively to signal his anxiety for his ether bags. At some point we just need to come right out and get rid of these types. Here: treat "ETH the asset" as a myth. Ethereum is a platform to save the Internet. It is not here to make you rich. Go get high on solana shitcoins or hoard Bitcoin under your mattress if that's what you want. Sure, Ethereum's assured victory ultimately means hoarding ether-as-gas is a viable investment strategy, but only in the long-run; only when centralized, permissioned, insecure, unsustainable chains all crumble under the weight of their complicity. There's no ophthalmologist on Earth who can treat a nearsightedness so severe it can't see past Solana, of all things. Just roll over and drop the ETH-maxi shtick. Or, better yet, sell your ether bags and continue to cover the space. If you're actually here for some social movement for freedom (or whatever the "Bankless" MO is), why the personal concern for "bad looks" on twitter? (as if these are perfectly correlated with short-term price action) That Ethereum can hold its head high, committed to principles, is exactly the reason for my support. Ethereum is exceptional. If it listened to stochastic barking online (your claimed "real world"), it would be massified. It would be Solana. Thank God for protecting cypherpunk from such an ignoble death as that.

@MiladyBonkle @TrustlessState Solana executes. Ethereum writes essays and paints pictures of infinite gardens.

Which do you have a problem with? Censorship Resistance, Open Source and Free, Privacy, or Security? These are exactly Ethereum's "product relevancy". These are the only things that distinguish a blockchain from a centralized database. Beneath all the edgy fanfare, a smart contract is only distinguished from server-hosted code by CROPS. The stablecoin chains already demonstrate this (to not even entertain some fight over hosting memetokens). Like do you want Ethereum to compromise the entire chain so it can "compete" with institutional clubs like Tempo, Arc, or Plasma? It would lose. It's only a quirk of temporary future-blindless that an intra-bank blockchain-aware faction has to drag the slow behemoth along with it through these games appealing to our industry. They will always resolve to the most profitable outcome for their oligopolistic incumbency. This is about speed and security to them. They could just abolish ACH and have cybersecurity upgrades to their systems. But they're not nimble so it has to look like disruption and alternative (so long as these are effectively no less outside their authoritarian purview). Fortunately, information and markets naturally free themselves of inefficiencies posed by vestigial intermediaries. I.e., the CROPS chain will attract flow in the long-run, only after the negative cost of vampiric middle-men is demonstrated by the market. This will take time. The 21st century stages man's digitization. It is a 100 year battle. Ethereum is the single most important project on the side of liberty. The technological affordances of the coming epoch will end in Singleton unless freedom is unavoidable. We already see this tendency in the AI wars. CROPS is the bedrock for any conceivable alternative. I, and even cynical bag-defending you, should want nothing less than this extreme solemnity in the hearts of the World Computer's stewards. If they took it any less seriously we wouldn't stand a chance.

every token with previous investors has this setup but the difference is that MetaDAO investors have additional baked in protections On MetaDAO new investors can liquidate if they feel that the project was not what they were sold / is significantly underperforming expectations