Tabz
5.3K posts
Tabz
@TabzWare
Path of Least Resistance ✗ Proudly Canadian 🇨🇦
👀 UNHINGED: Desperation is beginning to show from the federal Liberals as MP @NathalieProvost and Safety Minister @Gary_SRP announce truly dismal participation numbers (only 51,000 declarations) with only a week to go in the failed gun confiscation program. Q&A starts @ 4:38 👇
UPDATE – Suspect Arrested, Three Outstanding After Armed Home Invasion in Vaughan - discharged firearm determined to be from homeowner - a male was dropped off at a Toronto-area hospital shortly after home invasion reported, determined to have been shot as a result of the home invasion - three suspects remain outstanding - suspect at hospital remains in police custody in stable condition - homeowner not charged based on evidence obtained by investigators Full details here: yrp.ca/en/Modules/New…
If someone threatens you or your loved ones at home, you must be able to defend yourself. The Stand on Guard Act, introduced by MP @SandraCobena_, will protect Canadians’ right to defend their homes and families: conservative.ca/cpc/defend-you…
Conservatives introduce bill to create 'stand your ground' law for home invasions ctvnews.ca/politics/artic…
We're rebuilding, rearming, and reinvesting in the Canadian Armed Forces. From making sure they have the equipment they need, to giving service members the biggest pay raise in a generation — we’re reinforcing our capacity to protect our country, our allies, and our values.
The road ahead for Canada’s sweeping firearms confiscation scheme is far from clear—and according to one of the country’s most experienced firearms lawyers, the government may soon face a serious political and legal dilemma. In our latest issue of the Canadian Firearms Journal, renowned firearms attorney Guy Lavergne breaks down what could happen next as the federal “buyback” program struggles to gain compliance across the country. Drawing on real data from the program’s rollout—where compliance is strikingly low—Lavergne explores the very real possibility that Ottawa may not have the resources, legal capacity, or political support to enforce mass confiscation on hundreds of thousands, to possibly millions, of Canadian firearm owners. Lavergne is widely regarded as one of Canada’s leading legal minds on firearms law. He has represented the National Firearms Association in major constitutional and firearms cases and has appeared in proceedings connected to the Supreme Court of Canada. His work has contributed to significant legal victories for Canadian firearms owners, including successful challenges related to Chief Firearms Officer authority and participation in high-profile firearms cases involving sentencing and regulatory overreach. In this analysis, Lavergne examines the government’s realistic options if widespread non-compliance continues—from criminal prosecutions and licence revocations to amnesty extensions, political delays, or even a quiet rollback of the program through grandfathering provisions. He also outlines the enormous logistical, legal, and political hurdles the government would face if it attempted to enforce the confiscation at scale. This is one of the most detailed legal examinations yet of what may actually happen if Canadians simply refuse to comply—and why the outcome may ultimately be decided as much by politics as by law. This article is so important that we’ve made it available to read on our website. However, for the full issue of the Canadian Firearms Journal—and access to more in-depth legal analysis, advocacy, and expert insight—you must have a membership with Canada’s National Firearms Association. We extend our sincere thanks to Guy Lavergne for his contribution and his continued work defending the rights of Canadian firearms owners. If you want to understand what may really happen next in Canada’s confiscation program, this is an article you won’t want to miss. Link: nfa.ca/now-whats-goin…