Warren Porter

15.1K posts

Warren Porter banner
Warren Porter

Warren Porter

@Warp_Reality

Microwave Observations of Earth @NASAgoddard @NOAAsatellites @JPSSprogram Sounder for Microwave Based Applications (SMBA) Near Earth Observation Network (NEON)

Berwyn Heights, MD 参加日 Kasım 2012
3.2K フォロー中290 フォロワー
Warren Porter
Warren Porter@Warp_Reality·
@gummibear737 @AstorAaron Why does Iran need the GCC to threaten an embargo before opening the strait? Isn't the whole point of closing the strait to blockade GCC exports?
English
0
0
0
5
Gummi
Gummi@gummibear737·
@AstorAaron the same thing applies to the red sea the gcc is saying that the world needs to enforce international law iran is going to kick and scream but they’ve lost their leverage
English
2
1
11
120
Gummi
Gummi@gummibear737·
Trump is right when he says the Iran War is pretty much over, and it's because Iran has basically lost any and all leverage over the Strait of Hormuz (as well as its serious looming economic crisis) There's a small (but bombshell) detail from the ceasefire negotiations in Islamabad that has been unreported by the MSM, but was just broken by @aimendean...and it means that the war is probably done. If you don't know who Aimen is, he's the most insightful and credible analyst of the Middle East I have found to date He reports that this emerged at the negotiations this weekend and I quote: "The Saudis stood up for the whole GCC against this (Iran control of the Strait of Hormuz). And in fact, they threatened the Iranians that doing so would mean that we (the entire GCC) are not going to export a single drop of oil or LNG, forever, as long as you are in control of this. So technically, it's the GCC telling the world and especially the European Union that we're going to impose an embargo on the rest of the world if the rest of the world is not going to enforce international law when it comes to the Strait of Hormuz" So the GCC is ready to take 22% of global oil and LNG offline...and not just what transits the Strait of Hormuz, but all energy production. This means that Iran has basically lost all the leverage it ever had with regards to the Strait of Hormuz This is why the US doesn't have to move a muscle to open the Strait and why Iran's rhetoric has become far softer in recent days. Nothing is guaranteed, but the Iranians have almost no cards at this point...which is why Trump is so confident that the Iran War is pretty much over The Europeans could learn a thing or two from the GCC podcasts.apple.com/be/podcast/ame…
English
17
96
447
18.1K
Jack Bowers
Jack Bowers@robpgole·
@JewishWarrior13 Where are the ports? It seems like all oil flows through the same location- Persian Gulf, Straits of Hormuz and Gulf Oman which are all connected. The Caspian Sea is not realistic given the location of the oil fields.
English
3
0
2
254
Raylan Givens
Raylan Givens@JewishWarrior13·
🚨 Report on an Iranian news channel: Iran will use alternative ports, instead of those located in southern Iran, to bypass the US blockade of Hormuz
English
17
7
51
9K
Warren Porter
Warren Porter@Warp_Reality·
@gummibear737 Iran can replace about 5% of their maritime oil exports with railroad exports.
English
0
0
0
112
Warren Porter
Warren Porter@Warp_Reality·
@JDFilkins @Polymarket Sanctioned vessels transited the strait yesterday after the deadline and they were neither boarded nor seized.
English
1
0
0
8
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
JUST IN: Iran reportedly may pause shipping through the Strait of Hormuz to respect the blockade & avoid jeopardizing U.S. talks.
English
224
324
4.1K
312.3K
JD Filkins
JD Filkins@JDFilkins·
@Polymarket Pardon me, but does not the order "Blockade" imply that shipping is already paused? Isn't this like Iran promising to not cross that bridge anymore the day after you've blown he thin into the ravine?
English
1
0
3
253
Warren Porter
Warren Porter@Warp_Reality·
@mattbigos @JavierBlas Iran can still sell about 5% of its current oil exports overland via railroad. It's still a big shock, but it's better than going to zero.
English
0
0
1
167
Matt Bigos
Matt Bigos@mattbigos·
@JavierBlas Outside of Oil sales, does Iranian gov have any other meaningful sources of revenue?
English
10
0
15
6.1K
Javier Blas
Javier Blas@JavierBlas·
Looking at the limited empty oil tankers inside the Persian Gulf, plus Tehran’s onshore storage, Iran will need to shut in wells in 10-15 days (the same process its neighbours faced 5-6 weeks ago). Would that prompt Iran to change its negotiation approach? Unclear.
English
70
213
1.2K
141.2K
The Panic
The Panic@ThePanic16·
@Warp_Reality @bonchieredstate I have no interest in your fines and penalties bullshit “Worn-out Warren. Deport them all. 10 deportation centers nationwide 24 C-130’e at each center, one filled with illegal aliens, 10 flights every hour, on the hour, non-stop for 6 years.
English
1
0
0
14
Warren Porter
Warren Porter@Warp_Reality·
@OSUDOC63 @tparsi Every barrel sold to a foreign buyer makes Americans bid up the price of the remaining barrels available for domestic consumption. This creates stagflationary pressure on our economy.
Berwyn Heights, MD 🇺🇸 English
0
0
3
24
DOCOSU63
DOCOSU63@OSUDOC63·
@tparsi Oil tankers are sailing to the United States as we speak. We will be the world's source of oil until Iran capitulates. Saudi Arabia has rerouted 7 million barrels of oil per day through its pipeline.
English
8
0
9
797
Trita Parsi search. ..
Regarding Trump's threat/decision to impose a naval blockade on Iran, color me a skeptic. 1. Taking more oil off the market, particularly the only oil that is now getting out from the Persian Gulf, will drive oil prices further up, and the paper price of oil will get closer to the actual price, which should be around $150 per barrel. A dramatic increase in inflation in the US will ensue. Avoiding this is precisely why Trump was stuck in a position where he had no escalatory options out of this conflict before the ceasefire. He still doesn't. 2. Stopping tankers carrying Iranian oil wouldn't just be an escalation vis-à-vis Iran, but also against the countries that are buying Iranian oil, which includes China, India, and other Asian countries. I doubt Trump is ready for that escalation, particularly given the upcoming summit in Beijing. 3. This is also true for punishing countries that have negotiated a toll with Iran for the Straits. That includes Pakistan, which hosted the negotiations. 4. The naval blockade escalation will make the closing of the Red Sea more likely by the Houthis. That would take another 12% of global oil flow off the market. We would now be looking at oil around $200 per barrel. There are nine or so days left of the ceasefire. Since neither side has explicitly stated that talks won't resume, or that the ceasefire is dead and over with, all these moves should be treated as tactics and threats within the negotiations. It wouldn't be surprising if these threats are walked back soon (perhaps before markets open on Monday) and a new round is announced. HOWEVER, there is a time for brinkmanship, and there is a time for serious negotiations. If the US truly was insisting on zero enrichment in Islamabad, which was not Trump's red line at first but rather Israel's, then the next talks will be rendered a failure - just as the talks in May 2025 were killed by Trump shifting to the Israeli red line. Still, I don't think that necessarily will lead to a return to war. A more likely scenario is a new non-negotiated status quo in which Tehran retains control over the Straits but doesn't get any sanctions relief, while the US pulls out of the war, and the question becomes whether Israel will continue the war on its own.
English
192
1.1K
3.5K
320.3K
Warren Porter
Warren Porter@Warp_Reality·
@gummibear737 If Iran attacks a US navy vessel enforcing the blockade, it doesn't give the US any more cause to bomb Iranian power plants, with prejudice or otherwise.
Newington Forest, VA 🇺🇸 English
0
0
0
86
Gummi
Gummi@gummibear737·
What Trump is basically doing is holding the ceasefire hostage and daring Iran to break it If Iran does nothing then along w/blockade of Iranian ships they'll start escort convoys and dare Iran to do something If Iran attacks, then Trump has cause to escalate with prejudice
U.S. Central Command@CENTCOM

x.com/i/article/2043…

English
26
34
340
14.6K
Warren Porter
Warren Porter@Warp_Reality·
@Homerpezz @ScottPresler Threatening jail for purgery is enough deterrence for people. The risk/reward calculation is obvious enough. One vote that probably won't change an election's outcome isn't worth the risk of incarceration.
Newington Forest, VA 🇺🇸 English
0
1
1
23
Homerpez
Homerpez@Homerpezz·
@ScottPresler I keep trying to remind people: Some of our biggest states have NO CITIZENSHIP VERIFICATION AT ALL. There's just a box saying, "I know that perjury is a crime." This is not hurdle for illegals. There are easily tens of millions of them registered and voting normally.
English
2
1
5
222
ThePersistence
ThePersistence@ScottPresler·
Here’s how democrats have shifted the conversation: “Illegal aliens can’t register to vote.” “Illegal aliens aren’t registering to vote — it was a Driver’s License glitch.” “Illegal aliens can’t vote.” “The illegal aliens that voted were caught; so, the system is working.” “There isn’t widespread illegal alien voting.”
English
331
4.1K
16.7K
168.3K
Warren Porter がリツイート
Rory Johnston
Rory Johnston@Rory_Johnston·
Bunch of people have asked so to answer directly: these Hormuz offset numbers are entirely bunk. Absolutely fair to be optimistic about the war ending and Hormuz reopening, but it’s fundamentally flawed to say we’re offset the Hormuz supply loss and irresponsible to clam it’s not a serious ongoing crisis. Bad estimates (the reality below) 🇸🇦 7M: Saudi Reroute (That’s total East -West pipeline capacity, already had 2-2.5 on the line so remaining “swing” from Gulf to Red Sea is 4.5-5.0 MMbpd) 📈 4.25M: Pre-War Surplus (We did have a pre-war surplus, but it was closer to 2 MMbpd, and even that remains disputed—I was on the bearish side of the debate) 🇨🇳 2M: China Safe-Passage (There is no steady cleared safe passage) 🇦🇪 1.5M: UAE ADCOP reroute (Again, this is the pipe capacity—swing is more like 0.5-0.7) 🇮🇷 1M: Iran Jask Bypass (This is silly, Jask never demonstrated that capacity but more fundamentally Iran Hormuz flows actually remain higher than that at 1.5+ MMbpd) 🇮🇳 400k: India Safe-Passage (There is no steady cleared safe passage) In reality, we have ~13 MMbpd of upstream Gulf production offline, with no sustainable offset—SPRs, etc. are only a temporary help. Today’s Trump blockade would raise that to more than 15 MMbpd.
Rory Johnston tweet mediaRory Johnston tweet media
James Bull@thejbullmarket

The myth of the Strait of Hormuz closure. 80% (16.25M bpd) of the 20M barrels per day supply of the Strait of Hormuz has already been replaced or been rerouted. 🇸🇦 7M: Saudi Reroute 📈 4.25M: Pre-War Surplus 🇨🇳 2M: China Safe-Passage 🇦🇪 1.5M: UAE ADCOP reroute 🇮🇷 1M: Iran Jask Bypass 🇮🇳 400k: India Safe-Passage Deficit? Only 3.8M bpd and even just 2 more tankers per day would reduce the deficit to 0. With 1.3B and 500 millions barrels in combined reserves for China & India respectively, they have a 3-4 month reserves before they run into a deficit. This is why stocks are back at nearly ATH again. Opening the Strait of Hormuz has now merely turned into an afterthought.

English
45
254
1.3K
230.6K
Warren Porter
Warren Porter@Warp_Reality·
@Libertybibbledy @bonchieredstate Amnesty traditional means all penalties are waived, which would exclude trading a penalty of removal for a restitution of 1000/yr for 7 years.
Newington Forest, VA 🇺🇸 English
0
0
0
6
Warren Porter
Warren Porter@Warp_Reality·
@ThePanic16 @bonchieredstate Why do you think it is important to use the same word to describe changing the penalty from removal to a fine as the word we use for removing all penalties altogether?
Newington Forest, VA 🇺🇸 English
1
0
0
10
Warren Porter がリツイート
Javier Blas
Javier Blas@JavierBlas·
Three questions: 1) Would the US stop Chinese-flagged vessels going in-and-out the Persian Gulf? And if the tankers don’t stop? 2) What’s the plan if the Houthis of Yemen blockade the Bab al-Mandeb? 3) Would the U.S. stop Iranian tankers loading at Jask (outside the SoH)?
English
191
375
1.6K
132.3K
Warren Porter
Warren Porter@Warp_Reality·
@808_38hz @akarlin Unlike Trump and Netanyahu, Xi doesn't have to face an election this year with constituents angry about the price of gasoline. China has a lot more flexibility to outlast USA + Israel.
English
1
0
0
38
Matt
Matt@808_38hz·
@Warp_Reality @akarlin It will be open to them when they need it, which they will, including KSA oil.
English
1
0
0
64
Anatoly Karlin 🧲💯
The problem is that Iran's demands are absurdly maximalist: * Permanent Hormuz tolls * Reparations * Unblock frozen assets * No restrictions on uranium enrichment * Ceasefire includes Lebanon It's what you would only reasonably demand after a crushing military victory!
English
242
51
1.2K
72.9K
Richard Hanania
Richard Hanania@RichardHanania·
I think Hormuz has broken Trump. We always say he's inconsistent and changes his mind. But this is different. I don't think he's ever been this all over the place on an issue in such a short period of time. "OPEN HORMUZ OR YOUR CIVILIZATION DIES." "We don't need Hormuz, it's Europe's problem." "Oh actually, we're probably going to have a deal with the Iranians to run it together." "It's great Hormuz is not open, we get to sell more oil!" "Actually, Hormuz is open! The media is lying again." When he's been inconsistent before, usually he cycles through different positions, at least showing some consistency for a short period of time. Here he's constantly saying contradictory things in the same breath, over and over again. I think he realizes he's stuck. He can let Iran have Hormuz and say it doesn't matter or lie about what happened. MAGA idiots may believe him, but he'll be a laughing stock to everyone else. Or he can pivot back to "DESTROY THEIR CIVILIZATION," send oil to $150, and hope it works. Either 1) more war, which wrecks the economy going into the midterms, or 2) total loss, and maybe the economy recovers if Iran allows enough traffic through, but this goes along with what is probably the worst strategic defeat in American history. Just terrible options all around.
English
301
692
6.6K
483.2K