Steve Reynolds

This is one of the most important threads that explains what has been eating at you over the last few years. Ever since the great Precambrian Woke Explosion of 2020, it no longer mattered what the specific issue was whether it was climate change, BLM, trans rights, ANTIFA, Free Palestine, or feminism. All left-wing activist causes suddenly felt deeply interconnected and totalizing in very weird and strange ways. If you are a sane person, you'd have asked: > how come feminists didn't care about the Iranian women subjugated and slaughtered by the Mullahs for wanting more freedom? > how come UN Women cared more about making sure trans women (men) have access to female prisons than Hamas terrorists raping Israeli women? > how come Greta "How Dare You" Thunberg smoothly pivoted to campaigning against Israeli "apartheid" while never once mentioning China destroying marine ecosystems with overfishing? > what the fuck EVEN is Queers for Palestine? > why the hell was Microsoft doing land acknowledgments before Zoom town halls? Everything from American corporate life to Hollywood movies to universities became vehicles for the omnicause: a single, all-encompassing moral framework where climate, race, gender, borders, and foreign conflicts are fused. The surface “issue” often became secondary to maintaining ideological purity across the entire bundle. What was driving this? I KNEW where it was coming from. Now, @DataRepublican and @AsraNomani have the receipts. David Horowitz used to say that "the issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution." The revolution here is the overthrow of the ideological architecture of the West and the remaking of the world order. China's leadership explicitly wants to undermine American confidence of itself and of the US-led World Order because Beijing is a revisionist power that sees the system as designed to keep it subordinate. And so it amplifies narratives that portray the US-led order as the "root of evil" - imperialist, morally bankrupt, white supremacist, exploitative, and in inevitable decline. The aim is cognitive warfare to erode domestic support for protecting this order which serves to facilitate China's seamless rise. Neville Roy Singham has funneled at least $278 million through dark-money intermediaries, donor-advised funds, shell companies, and US nonprofits into a vast network of far-left activist groups, media outlets, and political education organizations to push this. @DataRepublican directly quotes Singham at a 2024 CCP forum in Shanghai: "If we want to have a new world order based on multilateralism that President Xi and CPC and China have proposed, we have to undo the ideological damage that has been done by the narrative of World War II." Read that again. Understand that Singham sees this WWII narrative as the last major cultural obstacle standing between the current order and the “multipolar” (China-led) future his network is working toward. And now... notice all those around us who are parroting the same line. It used to be just the crazy lefties and the NGOs like the UN. Or the globalists like the WEF. Now you're seeing it on the right. Beijing wins when a majority in the West treats US hegemony and the post-1945 system as invalid, so that it can replace it with one where it sets the rules and norms.

x.com/i/article/2036…