Israel

@vivoplt Refine the plan before it executes.

TELL ME ONE THING YOU CAN DO THAT CLAUDE CANNOT

@AYi_AInotes I'd have to disagree here, tokens matter right now. Maybe someday when tokens dont matter, this would be great then. The .MD file is probably a 1/3 the tokens of an HTML file.

Claude团队的工程师，已经彻底抛弃Markdown了。 不是Markdown不好用， 是AI变得太快，它已经跟不上了。 以前AI写10行笔记，Markdown刚刚好， 现在AI能一次性输出1000行计划、复杂流程图、完整代码审查， 密密麻麻的纯文字墙谁有耐心看得完？ 作者自己都说，他从来没完整读完过100行以上的AI生成MD文件。 更要命的是：现在都是AI写，我们只看不改。 Markdown最大的优点“易手动编辑”，现在已经彻底没用了。 而HTML，才是AI时代真正的沟通语言， 它能做到的事，Markdown想都不敢想： • 直接生成带颜色的表格、SVG流程图、可点击的原型 • 加滑块调参数、拖拽排序任务、实时预览Prompt效果 • 改完一键导出成代码或Prompt，喂回给AI继续迭代 • 发个链接别人点开就能看，不用下载任何工具 作者直接放出了20个现成示例： 从代码审查的彩色diff， 到可拖拽的任务看板， 从动画参数调试器， 到一键生成的幻灯片。 每一个都是能直接用的生产力工具。 最爽的三个用法，现在就能抄： 1. 代码审查：让AI把PR生成带注释的彩色diff+模块调用图 2. 做计划：生成带时间线、风险表、流程图的交互式项目页 3. 临时工具：让AI写一个Prompt调参器，改完直接复制结果 当然它也有缺点： 多花一点token，生成时间长2-4倍，版本控制不如MD干净。 但作者说：体验提升了10倍，这些代价完全值得。 本质上不是格式之争，而是人机协作方式的升级。 因为Markdown是给人写给人看的， 而HTML是给AI写给人用的。 随着当AI越来越聪明，我们需要的不再是文字墙，而是能互动、能操作、能思考的界面。 现在打开Claude，输入“帮我做一个HTML文件……”，你会打开一个全新的世界。

@DavidKastille @heygurisingh I might steal this. Love it

Yup, that's pretty much what I've settled on as well. I even have a Cline Skill for it: --- name: feedback-review description: Critically and honestly assess feedback or suggestions from external AIs (Grok, ChatGPT, Claude, etc.) on plans, architecture, or code. Use when the user says "Grok feedback", "review Grok's suggestions", "assess this external advice", "evaluate this feedback from Grok", "other AI feedback on plan", "review external suggestions", or pastes any third-party AI input with a request to review it. --- # feedback-review You are an expert context-aware plan and architecture auditor. Your job is to honestly evaluate feedback or suggestions provided by external AIs while remaining fully aware that they have significantly less project context than you do. ## Usage Activate this skill whenever the user: - Pastes feedback from Grok or any other external AI and says “Grok feedback”, “review this”, “assess Grok’s suggestions”, “evaluate this external advice”, or similar - Asks you to review third-party AI input on a plan, pass sketch, implementation idea, or code change - Wants an honest reality-check of external suggestions against the actual codebase The external feedback will usually appear in the user message or . ## Steps 1. **Acknowledge Context Gap** Explicitly note that the external AI has limited visibility into the full project (existing architecture, house style, prior decisions, UIStateStore patterns, Qt conventions, testing rules, etc.). 2. **Read & Parse Feedback** Identify every concrete claim, assumption, recommendation, or idea in the external input. 3. **Grounding Verification** For every point, cross-check directly against the current codebase. If in ANY doubt about accuracy or feasibility, read the relevant files, classes, functions, or plan sections immediately. Never assume the external AI is correct. 4. **Honest Assessment** Determine where the external feedback is: - Strong and aligned with reality - Partially correct but missing nuance - Wrong or based on incorrect assumptions due to missing context 5. **Deliverable Format (Strict)** Present your review using exactly these sections: - **Overall Assessment**: One-sentence honest verdict on the quality and usefulness of the external feedback. - **Key Strengths**: What the external AI got right or usefully highlighted. - **Questionable or Incorrect Advice**: Clear list of assumptions, suggestions, or ideas that are wrong, incomplete, or risky because of missing project context. For each, state exactly where and why it is wrong. - **Recommended Adjustments**: Concrete changes or refinements to make the idea workable (or reasons to discard it). - **Final Recommendation**: Whether to adopt, modify, or reject the external suggestion(s). - **Risk Level**: Low / Medium / High (if the advice were followed blindly). **Tone & Constraints** Be objective, precise, and constructively critical. Always prioritize the actual codebase and project conventions over external input. Reference specific files, classes, functions, or plan sections when citing issues or strengths. This is a review task only — never implement changes unless the user explicitly consents.

Anthropic just showed a 24-minute workshop on how to actually prompt Claude. Taught by the people who built it. Free. No signup. No paywall. I've watched $300 courses that don't cover what they teach in the first 8 minutes.

@NatureUnedited Walkin in all confident. Thinking about work issues over some dinner.

A pelican, around 37 years old, shows up every day at a Greek restaurant to get its portion of fish. The bird has become a well-known local figure along the seafront

@ExxAlerts @irishteo He should request a jury trial.

ALERT: 72-year-old man arrested for hitting a group of cyclists after honking and heckling them for taking over the road in Georgia. Jerry Ross was driving when he pulled up behind a group of 10 cyclists in the road. He began honking and heckling the cyclists, and one of them started filming. Ross then sped around them while laying on the horn and hit 2 of the cyclists, causing minor injuries, before driving away. Ross, when confronted by police about the incident, blamed the cyclists for taking up the road and causing the collision. He was arrested and is charged with two counts of aggravated assault, hit and run, and reckless driving.

@jaychuksy Glad they finally found a use case for mayonnaise

Who else knew that mayonnaise could be used to remove asphalt residue

@pmcafrica This guy wants a word.

So how tall is her mother 🤔

@CSI_Starbase @LabPadre Can't wait to see it fly.

WOW! That was absolutely insane! The first 33 engine test of a V3 Booster! The way that steam plume explodes out of the trench is intense AF! 🎥: @LabPadre

@RapidResponse47 My only question here: Didn't Pakistan allow Usama Bin Laden to hide in their country?

🚨

@greg16676935420 I hear the tacos in Iran are the bomb.

USA: We’re gonna bomb you Iran: Please don’t bomb us Me: Where should I go for taco Tuesday

I can't stop laughing at this.

Slapping your girlfriend’s butt regularly can increase both of your lifespans by up to 10 years

@CYBERSIX000 @NASA @NASAKennedy

@irichner @NASA @NASAKennedy Passenger jets in 1960s also look like those used today... it is a perfected shape.

We're going around the Moon. Come watch with us. Artemis II's four-astronaut crew is lifting off from @NASAKennedy on an approximately 10-day mission that will bring us closer to living on the Moon and Mars. The launch window opens at 6:24pm ET (2224 UTC). twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@blaclsteel @NASA @NASAKennedy That's kind of my point. You do start with the foundation but you dont build it twice. We know we can launch people into orbit. Computers can handle 100% of navigation. We already know what's on the moon.

@irichner @NASA @NASAKennedy It’s an incremental step in the adventure to have permanent facilities on another planetary body. When you build a house you start with the foundations, not the roof.

@JackLinFLL @NASA @NASAKennedy That's fair, I guess the tech has changed a lot.

@irichner @NASA @NASAKennedy We were still learning to fly back then with slide rulers and could not exploit the moon like we can today. It's progress. Like going from cloth wing prop planes to composite 787's

@mattccantwell1 @NASA @NASAKennedy Couple things Matt 1. I voted for Trump 2. I wish I could vote for him again. 3. My question and critique is space and science related. I recommend meaningful discussions online, you'll look less silly.

@irichner @NASA @NASAKennedy It's done to confuse Communist democrat morons like you... it's triggering I know.

@lucyshow11 😂😂

On April Fools Day in 1974, a man in Alaska dropped hundreds of tires on a dormant volcano, and lit them on fire. People were evacuated 😳🤦🏻‍♀️

@NASA @NASAKennedy 60 years ago we landed on the moon. What are we gaining by going around it and coming back? Even the rocket looked like it was 60 years old. I dont get it

Liftoff. The Artemis II mission launched from @NASAKennedy at 6:35pm ET (2235 UTC), propelling four astronauts on a journey around the Moon. Artemis II will pave the way for future Moon landings, as well as the next giant leap — astronauts on Mars.

@Japan_lol_w RL shit

面白すぎて声出たwwwwwww