Dodger_the_dog

1.9K posts

Dodger_the_dog banner
Dodger_the_dog

Dodger_the_dog

@juleshad

参加日 Aralık 2015
135 フォロー中37 フォロワー
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@gregbagwell That a bunch of probably misogynistic egotists have an opinion should not be news. Look at the discipline records of the Red Arrows to understand their credibility as commentators. If I wanted a display pilot ok, if I want an industrial strategy or procurement expert - NO
English
0
0
0
6
Greg Bagwell
Greg Bagwell@gregbagwell·
Behind a paywall so didn’t read it all, but the requirement for the next RAF trainer, first & foremost, is to be a world class, cost effective fast jet trainer. A UK option would be nice, but not at any cost or risk, no matter how many ex Reds are paid to say it…
Greg Bagwell tweet media
English
32
5
103
14.9K
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@haynesdeborah How about starting with the basics of sorting out the Navy before trying to create a command structure to direct the assets if other nations. If you can't get the basics right why should any other nations trust you with theirs?
English
0
0
1
48
Deborah Haynes
Deborah Haynes@haynesdeborah·
NEW: The UK is rallying a new force of navies from among northern allies to be ready to fight and defend their seas amid a growing threat from Russia, the head of the Royal Navy has said It will be like the Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) and will complement NATO - but with the ability to react faster. General Sir Gwyn Jenkins said in a @RUSI_org lecture: “I aim to create a maritime force that trains, exercises and prepares together. A force designed to fight immediately if required, with real capabilities, real war plans, and real integration. “A force in which interchangeability – the ability to substitute, swap, or mix equipment, parts, ammunition, or personnel – is made possible because member nations would be operating common systems and platforms, shared digital networks, logistics and stockpiles. “A force that generates the maritime, air and amphibious strike capabilities that we all need. “This would be a visible and persistent conventional deterrent. A force that is stronger, collectively, than the sum of its parts…. “We are now looking at the creation of a family of allied fleets – something that has not happened in decades. Ultimately, we intend for them to be trained through our Fleet Operational Standards and Training (FOST), supported through UK doctrine and integration standards, and commanded if necessary from Northwood in our Maritime Operations Centre. “Last week I hosted naval chiefs from across Northern Europe to discuss how we can make this plan a reality. “And I am delighted to confirm to you today that during that meeting, we signed a statement of intent committing each of our nations to working up detailed proposals for our Northern Navies initiative. “We know we have no time to lose, which is why by the end of this year, I want us all to have signed a formal declaration, laying the foundations for what will be a vital and enduring partnership for many years to come.”
English
26
53
193
22.8K
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@BO3673 He thinks it drives competitive advantage to USA as they have less need for Gulf oil and minerals than his Asian competitors.
English
1
0
1
11
Phil
Phil@BO3673·
He thinks the US blockade is cost-free. Until he is disabused of that notion he will reject any and all Iranian offers. At least we can be sure the markets will eventually provide in this instance...
Tyler Pager@tylerpager

News: Trump told advisers he is not satisfied with Iran’s latest proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and end the war, according to multiple people briefed on discussions in the White House Situation Room on Monday. w/ @julianbarnes nytimes.com/2026/04/27/us/…

English
2
0
4
283
Gabriele Molinelli
Gabriele Molinelli@Gabriel64869839·
We need real decision making but all we are getting is delay, obfuscation and a desperate struggle to stay afloat and wait for... i don't know exactly what. Further budget increases in future years which are anyway far from set in stone. It's a dangerous game.
English
5
1
21
1.6K
Gabriele Molinelli
Gabriele Molinelli@Gabriel64869839·
GCAP woes easily explained: GCAP is one of essentially 2 projects which require funding to the tune of Billion(s) x year (other being SSBNs). All others spend in few hundreds; many don't reach 100 million. Trying to keep GCAP in by hacking into far smaller projects isn't easy.
Modern Royal Navy@ModernNavy

Same old story - UK’s stealth fighter project faces a 10-week deadline to secure new government funds or risk its teams being disbanded, one of the defence groups involved has warned. More than 4,000 staff in the UK are already working on the project @FT archive.is/2026.04.27-052…

English
6
12
166
16.7K
Linda Dillon
Linda Dillon@LindaDillon1·
@phildstewart So apparently, after 47 years, they still think it would be rushed? How much did these diplomatic... hacks make over that time? Say what you will about Trump, but the level of incompetency that he has exposed among NATO and the "globalist" in everything he's done is stunning
English
1
0
0
555
Phil Stewart
Phil Stewart@phildstewart·
Allies fear a rushed US–Iran framework deal could backfire, leaving technical deadlock (Reuters) - European allies fear an inexperienced U.S. negotiating team is pushing for a swift, headline‑grabbing framework deal with Iran that could entrench rather than resolve deeper problems, diplomats with past experience dealing with Tehran said. They worry Washington, eager to claim a diplomatic win for President Donald Trump, could lock in a superficial agreement on Iran’s nuclear programme and sanctions relief, then struggle through months or years of technically complex follow‑on talks. "The concern isn’t that there won’t be an agreement,” said a senior European diplomat, one of eight who spoke to Reuters who have previously worked on the nuclear file or continue to do so. "It's that there will be a bad initial agreement that creates endless downstream problems.” @PHREUTERS and @IrishJReuters report
English
69
94
271
211.2K
Stephen Pickles
Stephen Pickles@pickles_stephen·
@Gabriel_Pogrund @DanNeidle While the HMRC are it they should take a look at Labour Party Properties Ltd who have only paid £130,000 tax in 25 years despite generating £30 Million in rental income in that time 🙄
Stephen Pickles tweet media
English
1
0
0
112
Gabriel Pogrund
Gabriel Pogrund@Gabriel_Pogrund·
Exclusive: Richard Tice failed to pay £100k in tax, benefiting his investment firm — which then gave big sums to Reform Tice gave contradictory reasons for why four shell companies paid zero tax. @DanNeidle says they flouted "basic" rule, face HMRC probe thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
English
244
1.8K
3.9K
903.2K
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@thinkdefence Agree but we also need to be clear where that is MoD and where it is down to HMT/Cab Office processes. To often MoD takes a hit for spending impasse caused elsewhere
English
0
0
1
27
Think Defence
Think Defence@thinkdefence·
Second, it needs to demonstrate financial discipline and why it should be trusted with more taxpayers hard earned. Because let's face it, it doesnt have a stellar reputation.
English
10
1
41
2.1K
Think Defence
Think Defence@thinkdefence·
The problem with the current wall to wall noise about defence spending is it becomes wall to wall background noise. Great that attention levels are elevated, but defence needs to do a couple of things to capitalise...
English
4
3
57
4.3K
Dodger_the_dog がリツイート
OSINTdefender
OSINTdefender@sentdefender·
Since its founding, the only time that NATO has ever invoked Article 5 has been in the defense of the United States after 9/11, leading to the death of several hundred NATO-led coalition troops during the War in Afghanistan.
OSINTdefender tweet media
OSINTdefender@sentdefender

U.S. President Donald J. Trump continues his complaining about NATO in a late night post on TruthSocial, stating: “NATO wasn’t there for us, and they won’t be there for us in the future! President DONALD J. TRUMP”

English
198
438
3.8K
343.1K
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@thinkdefence @panterdownes Just because the military have a way of deliberately planning they cannot understand that other ministries may have alternate approaches. We need to work with the target audience in language they understand and not subject ourselves to confirmation bias
English
0
0
0
8
Think Defence
Think Defence@thinkdefence·
@panterdownes We keep repeating the correct way of doing things then act surprised when the wheels fall off.
English
4
0
10
563
Dodger_the_dog がリツイート
The Angry Gunner
The Angry Gunner@TheAngry53586·
Just a reminder that my monarch qualified in MCMV ops when most of you were dreaming of a career at sea. And he didn’t have bone spurs. Just a sense of duty.
The Angry Gunner tweet media
English
27
61
643
20.6K
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@Gabriel64869839 Need to change HCDC from advisory to a more formal legal based scrutiny. Same should apply to all HoC Committes.
English
0
0
0
89
Gabriele Molinelli
Gabriele Molinelli@Gabriel64869839·
It is so refreshing to delve into the hearings of French defence chiefs. Imagine that, they actually ANSWER the questions. For someone coming from the reciprocal dance of humiliation and make-believe that are UK committee hearings, it is something that moves you to tears.
English
4
37
315
22.7K
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@thinkdefence HMT and Cab Off are half the problem with HMG spending. The time they take to make decisions on supposed delegated spend is ludicrous.
English
0
0
0
47
Think Defence
Think Defence@thinkdefence·
Money does not magically appear because reasons, and given the MoDs spectacular ability to spaf taxpayers hard earned up the wall on an industrial scale, can you blame the treasury for being a bit control freak?
English
15
3
64
3.6K
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@thinkdefence I would also add as part of addressing the foundations stop the madness of FFBNW and repeal the LFR methodology
English
0
0
0
117
Think Defence
Think Defence@thinkdefence·
You have been given an extra ten billion quid a year for defence, what you buying?
English
277
4
111
52.7K
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@smoggy1536445 @thinkdefence Disagree. The evolve so fast that we need access to a production line that produces oodles rather than putting millions in a shed and watch them become obsolete in year
English
1
0
2
17
smoggy (Ythan Harcourt)
smoggy (Ythan Harcourt)@smoggy1536445·
@thinkdefence Drones. Not this multi million AI bullshit. An unholy stockpile of short range fpvs and fibre optics. Along with short range recon drones.
English
2
1
12
272
𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗯𝗮𝘁 𝗕𝗼𝗼𝘁
@thinkdefence I’d politely decline it, say that we actually have enough dosh but cannot be trusted not to firehose extra at bizarre OJAR improving vanity projects. Give it to NHS until we can prove we won’t waste it.
GIF
English
5
1
30
1.3K
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@FTusa284 It should not just be for MoD to anchor UK Def Industry. DfT and HMT need to step up to the plate if prosperity is really to be a driver to economic growth. All too often MoD accepts the hit for failings elsewhere in HMG.
English
0
0
0
48
Francis Tusa
Francis Tusa@FTusa284·
A. Men.
Maxi@AllForProgress_

A British company called Skycutter, based in the East Midlands, just finished first out of the entire field in the Pentagon's Drone Dominance Program. Score of 99.3 out of 100. The largest order goes to them: two and a half thousand units, an initial Pentagon contract of twenty million dollars, with an option to scale up to two hundred million. Read that and really soak it in. It's something that rarely happens anymore. A small British startup beat the entire American defence-tech industrial complex on its own home turf, in a competition the Pentagon designed itself, against companies that get whatever they ask for from Washington on a Tuesday morning. It looks likely to be followed by something that always happens - Skycutter are, by the looks of things, going to pack up their talent and their operations and move all of it to America. Why? The MoD, they say, is too slow. The procurement cycle is too long. There is no clear pathway from "British company that builds something the world wants" to "British company that the British state buys from in serious quantity at serious speed." No byway through which you move from "A potentially world-toppling IP advantage" to "Complete and deserved domination of the global market." So we are about to lose them. Not because they want to leave, but because the country that produced them cannot organise itself fast enough to keep them. The MoD's response, by the way, was to issue a statement saying it wants the UK to be "the best place in the world to start and grow a defence business." It does not want to do this. Indeed it is difficult to convey, in polite English, how galling that sentence is when read alongside the news it is responding to. You're a serious country? You'd fight for a company like Skycutter. You'd fight to take them if they weren't yours, and you'd fight like mad to keep them if they were. A serious country has someone in Whitehall whose entire fucking job is making sure the next Skycutter doesn't end up in Virginia. We have, instead, a Defence Office for Small Business Growth. Which is the kind of name you give a thing that you created for no purpose other than taking the piss out of it.

Magyar
4
6
57
6.1K
Dodger_the_dog
Dodger_the_dog@juleshad·
@nicholadrummond If true, we need to find a way to relink GCAP and CASD from FOREX volatility. Currently they are slaying the Defence Vote.
English
0
0
1
308
Nicholas Drummond
Nicholas Drummond@nicholadrummond·
The growing distance between Europe and the United States will undoubtedly impact our reliance on the US defence industry. For this reason, it’s fair to say that GCAP / Tempest has assumed a much greater importance. The need for sovereign aerospace industry makes GCAP an opportunity to develop something truly special, an aircraft as legendary as classic designs like TSR-2, Tornado, and Harrier. In fact, once Tempest has been delivered, perhaps Britain will turn its attention to developing a new VSTOL aircraft capable of replacing the F-35B?
Nicholas Drummond tweet mediaNicholas Drummond tweet mediaNicholas Drummond tweet media
English
76
51
552
30.8K