
I am no Jedi
21.7K posts






This confirms ~ 13-day onshore storage estimate: Iran is now using containers and "junk storage" (disused tanks in poor condition) in Ahvaz and Asaluyeh to avoid cutting production. And now rail. They're delay tactics measured in days, not weeks. 1. Why rail is a dead end: Iran's own senior rail transport expert Morteza Naserian told Mehr News there are only 2 rail corridors to China, never used for petroleum, with severely limited capacity and zero bulk crude infrastructure. 2. The floating storage "fix" is equally thin. Iran pulled NASHA (IMO 9079107), a 30-year-old retired VLCC, out of the breakers. NASHA buys ~48 hours. 3. Jask terminal storage tanks have reportedly already hit maximum capacity as of April 25. Some tankers are now anchored near Kharg acting as improvised overflow. a fleet the Islamic Republic can't replicate at scale. 4. The 2020 precedent that some point out to (85% storage utilization + 120 Mbbl afloat) was managed under very different conditions (I was watching it from the inside): it was sanctions without a naval blockade, and with active export channels still partially open. That escape valve is gone now, and Iran's tankers (including its ghost fleet) are already filled up with 166M barrels. 5. Bottom line: containers, junk tanks, retired VLCCs, and rail fantasies are not a storage strategy. They're the last moves of a system running out of room, exactly on the timeline that was estimated. Don't forget about the gasoline shortage clock. wsj.com/livecoverage/i…


















Emirati Advisor Anwar Gargash: “Iran acts as if it is a superpower, even when it does not possess nuclear weapons. Imagine if it possessed those weapons!”


Everyone's focused on Iran's crude oil export/extraction disruptions. But there is another real domestic crisis: gasoline. Pre war, Iran was burning through 126 million liters of fuel per day while producing only ~110 million liters domestically. That 15-20M liter/day gap was being covered by imports costing ~$6 billion a year. 1/6 On March 7, strikes hit oil storage depots in Tehran and Alborz Province. ~30 tanks hit in southern Tehran alone. The immediate response: per-fill limits in Tehran cut from 30 liters to 20 liters overnight. Stations reported running dry. Citizens described it as "سهمیهبندی خاموش" or "silent rationing."


BREAKING • Phone contact between Araghchi and American officials has continued in recent days • In the past 24 hours, firm messages have been conveyed from Washington: the United States will not change its position, is not rushing into a deal, and will not compromise on the nuclear issue Three scenarios now being examined in Tehran: • Maintaining the current situation and waiting for a U.S. move • Conceding and reaching an agreement • Deliberate escalation: targeting Gulf states or moves in the Strait of Hormuz Shift in IRGC approach: • Until now, they assessed Trump was under pressure to reach a deal and could be leveraged • His tweets and conduct were interpreted as signs of weakness • A reassessment is now underway: understanding that Trump is not rushing and does not intend to concede Bottom line: Iran is being forced to recalibrate in the face of a far more rigid U.S. position than expected.







