ZaxbysChicken

@intheknowidaho Lmao prices wouldnt be that high if your pedophile president and his retardricans didnt get us into a war against Iran.

The gas prices update you’ve been waiting for, plus a comparisson between the Idaho pumps and a highly requested Washington spot. 👀🥦 Oil may be high, but Idaho still manages to keep a level head as Washington actively punishes you for purchasing one of the necessities. This is what you get when a state refuses to tax its citizens into oblivion!! 🇺🇸

@MichaelTay27324 @MW4Liberty Shut up chud. Take your complaints back to the retard factory

The court has been crooked since corporate personhood. Big Corporate Donors want overpopulation through birthright citizenship to get the cheapest labor possible, then put the costs of overpopulation on the people, through overcrowded public facilities, schools, hospitals etc. That’s why the crooked court will continue to ‘misinterpret’ birthright citizenship. That’s also why ‘lawmakers’ will never impeach the crooked judges, because they’re bankrolled by the same ‘Artificial People’ as the judges who created the ‘Artificial People’’. It’ll just get crookeder and crookeder until we get rid of corporate personhood. The court is not going to have a guilty conscience over something like birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens.

Ron Paul, the 🐐, on Birthright Citizenship. The 14th Amendment was ratified on July 9, 1868, as part of Reconstruction after the Civil War. Its original intent was to grant citizenship to formerly enslaved African Americans and protect them from discriminatory state laws through due process and equal protection. It should not grant automatic birthright citizenship to children of illegal immigrants. The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” meant full political allegiance to the U.S., which illegal entrants and their children lack. The framers never intended to reward unlawful presence or create incentives for illegal immigration. This was essentially the argument made by the solicitor general yesterday in front of the SCOTUS. I call balls and strikes. Trump’s team is right on this one.

@MW4Liberty It applies to children, regardless if the parents are illegal or not. Ill come back here to call you a retard and anyone else who agrees with you when SCOTUS rules against the Trump Pedophile Administration

@tdsfixer @overton_news Gonna be hard to think about birthright citizenship when gas is 5$ a gallon thanks to Trump and his wars

@overton_news Will become a national debate now. Trump’s entire purpose of going there was enough coverage to have people start asking questions. Independent’s don’t think like the progressive left . Mid Terms is what this is all about.

🚨 Stephen A. Smith dropped a SURPRISING take on birthright citizenship. “When the president walked in to the Supreme Court...to attend oral arguments...I’m here to tell you ladies and gentlemen, I don’t blame him.” Smith then asked his audience the uncomfortable question about birthright citizenship: “Is it right?” SMITH: “The issue that I wanted to get into is birthright citizenship by simply asking this question.” “When the president walked in to the Supreme Court today...to hear their thoughts, their questions, their inquiry, their opinions on birthright citizenship in the United States of America.” “How’d you feel about that?” “I’m here to tell you, ladies and gentlemen, I don’t blame him.” “He campaigned on this issue.” “He’s been accused of not paying attention to stuff that’s happening on our home soil.” “You want to do something politically expedient to your benefit, if you’re President Donald Trump, this is the fight you fight, because millions of Americans flow with him on this issue.” “And the reason why it’s an issue that’s important to tackle is because remember what the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution states.” “Remember what it states!” “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. “Meaning if you are born on U.S. soil, you are a U.S. citizen automatically. Automatically!” “Here’s the part that we have to ask ourselves, and this is where the conversation gets uncomfortable, do you believe in birthright citizenship as an American citizen?” “Do you believe that somebody that crosses our borders illegally, to give birth on American soil, that their children, their newborn should automatically be an American citizen?” “According to the United States Constitution, there is no argument there.” “What I’m asking you is, is it right?” “Should it happen?”

@TooMuchXwitter @overton_news What the hell are you talkin about bot

The 14th amendment explicitly says in fancy old English that the children of illegals aren’t citizens. The people who wrote and passed the 14th amendment said the children of illegals aren’t citizens. And then almost a century of laws and case law says the same thing. There is not “birthright citizenship” as we’ve all been psyoped into thinking!

@AtlantaFalcons LOVE IT!!!!!

For all the Dirty Birds

@ConservNational @greg_price11 🤣get ready for the midterms bud. Your party is gonna get fucked

@wingsandthings0 @greg_price11 I’m so glad we brought back that great word and you are a fag aren’t you. Why do blacks feel the need to glue plastic strips to their heads. She doesn’t even know the law it’s really embarrassing but most blacks in any position or judicial seems to be a pathetic joke.

Jackson: "How does this work? Are you suggesting that when a baby is born, people have to have documents determining a newborn child is a citizen of the United States?... Are we bringing in pregnant women for depositions?"

@MistyJernigan17 @MegynKellyShow @mrddmia @aronberg Literally not true. Please stop being retarded

@MegynKellyShow @mrddmia @aronberg Then we all need to revoke our citizenships. And start getting the privileges of illegals because they have more rights than we do.

"Why aren't the kids of illegals the same as the kids of diplomats?" Megyn debates SCOTUS' birthright citizenship case with @mrddmia and @aronberg. 👇

@SilencedSaxon Shut the fuck up retard

I want a dictator. Fuck democracy.

@ClayTravis They have different laws than we do. Its not that hard. Quit being retarded.

An American citizen’s baby can’t become a Chinese citizen by being born on the soil of China. Can anyone explain why a Chinese citizen’s baby should be able to become an American citizen by being born on the soil here? It’s absolute insanity.

Birthright citizenship for illegal aliens is a national security risk.

@Mustang_Scott @DittiePE 🤣🤣bro is so worried about my followers that you run away. Just admit you support a child fucker and ill leave you alone

@wingsandthings0 @DittiePE Following 780 with 39 followers? Tell me youre a bot without telling me Muted now byeeee

The Supreme Court hears arguments tomorrow on birthright citizenship. Before you accept any framing that this is a new legal question — it isn’t. We’ve been here before. Twice. Same amendment. Same four words. Different targets. The 14th Amendment, ratified 1868, says people born in the United States and “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” are citizens. The Trump administration’s entire argument rests on those four words — claiming undocumented immigrants aren’t truly “subject to jurisdiction,” so their U.S.-born children aren’t automatically citizens. We’ve heard this before. 1884 — Elk v. Wilkins John Elk was a Winnebago man born on U.S. soil. He moved to Omaha, renounced his tribal allegiance, tried to register to vote, and was denied. Government’s argument: not “subject to jurisdiction” at birth. Supreme Court agreed, 7-2. Same four words. Different group. 1898 — United States v. Wong Kim Ark Wong Kim Ark was born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents — parents who could never become citizens under the Chinese Exclusion Acts. When he returned from a trip to China, they turned him away at the border. Same argument. The Supreme Court rejected it 6-2 and ruled the 14th Amendment means what it says. That ruling has stood for 128 years. 2026 — Trump v. Barbara The administration is literally citing Elk v. Wilkins in its brief — a case widely considered superseded by Wong Kim Ark — arguing undocumented immigrants don’t fall under U.S. “political jurisdiction.” Also worth noting: this same administration prosecutes, detains, and deports undocumented people through federal authority. But suddenly they’re not “subject to jurisdiction” when it comes to their kids’ citizenship. They want it both ways. The 14th Amendment was written in the wake of Dred Scott specifically to prevent the government from carving classes of people born on American soil out of citizenship. Arguments are tomorrow.

@MarshaBlackburn Trump also fucks kids

The 14th Amendment does not empower illegal aliens to give birth in the U.S. to ensure their children automatically become citizens. President Trump is protecting the value and integrity of American citizenship. We cannot allow illegal aliens to exploit the system.

@RudeDolph90 @CBSNews Chud factory is that way bud. You arent doing anything

@CBSNews Americans will just have to take it into their own hands.

The Supreme Court appeared skeptical of President Trump's bid to end birthright citizenship during oral arguments in the case on Wednesday. “I walked into the morning thinking that there was no essentially no chance for the Trump administration,” CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson says. “I still end the morning that way, but I think it might be slightly closer.”

@MichelleBrodeu2 @anyonewantchips

@anyonewantchips Trump was a citizen when they were born.

As the Supreme Court is poised to rule on Trump’s request to end birthright citizenship - it might be a good time to mention the fact that Ivana was not a US citizen when Don Jr, Ivanka & Eric were born, and Melania was not a US citizen when Barron was born.

@grmarco @RedDirtBishop @greg_price11 Stfu retard. Different countries have different laws. If you dont like the way we do it here, the fuck off to a different country.

@RedDirtBishop @greg_price11 This should be the only argument needed! Spread this far and wide! So simple, yet they always want to help "everyone else". I am so done with half my paycheck paying for illegals, anchor babies, and fraud! Revolution sounds like our only avenue at this point.

@ConservNational @greg_price11 Stfu retard

@greg_price11 She needs to go she was never qualified to be a SCOTUS Dems placed this DEI moron in to help their destruction of the country. Why destroy it? Because Dems would rather rule ashes full of idiots then take the chance someone who can actually think and try and remove them.

@SenTedCruz You are less American than the babies that are born here to illegals

As President Trump attends oral arguments in the Supreme Court’s case on birthright citizenship, it’s important to understand what this policy is and why the Supreme Court would be wise to strike it down. 1/X

@Mustang_Scott @DittiePE Your side would have sex with the baby in your profile pic. You support pedophiles. You arent very smart, and if the baby in your profile pic is yours or in your family, i feel sorry for it.

@DittiePE And bonus points- since the left is fake and gay and all you do is lie- you don’t even really care about it BR citizenship except as it allows you to grow your voter base- because power is all you really care about you fascists

@WodenWanderer @NewGenMining3 @LeadingReport Ur a vet and a retard

@NewGenMining3 @LeadingReport A man can dream.

BREAKING: SCOTUS is about to consider upholding President Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order.