Aftyn

@MBTYuGiOh Delete this

Synchro summon? B-but we can’t do that! We’re b-both tuners! It's not… *mmph*… it's... *mmmph*...

@dogamsi I don't think she noticed, go for another scoop

O bunun fark edilmeyeceğini düşündü

@_Shadowlogic This is incorrect. Many venomous species (especially elapids like cobras, coral snakes, mambas) are venomous with rounded heads. Plus some harmless snakes will flatten their head to look more pointed (for various reasons, e.g. mimicry of other species)

This is how to identify a poisonous snake. So next time don't run, check the head to differentiate

@bezzypoo Generally true but it's a tad nuanced. If you're explicitly aiming to eat cheaper, then yeah.

veganism is miles cheaper than eating meats

@cakedpotatoes @oltxiu @tittyleds @bezzypoo For people in general sure. But the kind of people who are willing to improve their diet (vegans just being one example) are the kind of people who'll do research to know what they're getting into

@oltxiu @tittyleds @bezzypoo Okay but it's a widely known fact that the vast majority of people both do not know what they're doing and don't cook their own meals

@Celebrityhaze it'd get my attention too

Billie Eilish slaps her chest to get her dog’s attention and gets this reaction😂

@digdigpipijigj @poponze I'm not a vegan but by far the cheapest foods in my diet are the foods that are vegan-friendly

@poponze é fácil ser vegane quando se é milionária e provavelmente não cozinha a própria comida

Billie Eilish critica quem diz amar os animais, mas consome carne: “Comer carne é inerentemente errado. E outra coisa é: duas coisas não podem coexistir. 'Eu amo animais.' e 'Eu como carne'. Só que… não dá pra fazer os dois. Desculpe. Você pode comer carne, vai em frente. Pode amar os animais, mas não dá pra fazer os dois.”

@CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast Up to half of the human population dying being framed as "nothing happens" makes it hard to take this seriously

@MrBeast Let me simplify it for everyone.

Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.

@OriolanoChill They gotta use AI to portray it because it doesn't happen in real life

¿Alguien conoce UN SOLO CASO como el que explica la viñeta? Fíjate que no te pido 1000, ni 100, ni 10. Dame 1.

@Rozewraith____ @cheenmachine2 The rest of us can make up fake scenarios in our head as well buddy

At the end of the experiment, nobody dies and everyone who pressed the red button will be marked.

@SirSicCrusader They hear "mutations are random" and assume that means evolution itself is a random process, not realizing natural selection is the actual driving force behind it.

Weird how these people are never evolutionary biologists... almost like they might be missing some key insight.

@it_a_me_knowlzy Everyone clicking red would solve it yes, but in any realistic situation that's never going to happen. Thus making a blue win the only way in which everyone survives.

Is this some weird ass litmus test or something? Everyone pressing red solves the whole thing I think? Am I being punked?

@DekuTier14598 @Mantis_Religios @CapsuleCorpKami @purplepIuto Crazy concept here but people dying is generally not a good thing

@Mantis_Religios @CapsuleCorpKami @purplepIuto Why would i want to save stupid people and retard? Give me on one good reason.

Guilt tripping everyone to pick blue when they can just all pick red is hilarious lmao

@Flobertou >everybody survives >somehow gets mad about it They just really want people to die I guess

Why are red button pressers mad that they lose tho like you win ethier way bruh 😭

@0xmitsurii Not being able to cure someone isn't the same as not being able to help them

Psychiatrists when asked how many patients have they cured.

@TBoohbah @MattRichards82 @depression2019 There's a reasonable argument to be made that pressing red would make you complicit in mass genocide, in which case clicking blue would also be the moral decision

It is actually disturbing how dumb the average person is Red gives you a 100% chance of living, you literally get nothing beneficial out of choosing blue

@acklespaws I knew a guy with breath like that in highschool

even soldier boy was like yeah my son is NOT going out like that 😭 #theboys

@MattRichards82 @depression2019 Again, I reiterate: The results of the outcome have been that everybody survives. Instead of celebrating, we go through mental gymnastics to somehow pretend that's a bad thing.

Because it is logically retarded to even consider pushing BLUE. People that don't think through it don't understand that... It's simply a wording trick! Here's a different way of asking that same question: There are two buttons. Everyone that presses red will survive. People that press blue will only survive if more than half of you press it, but red buttons pushers will stay alive either way. What do you choose now? Not a single person chooses blue now, just because of wording.

@dzeeff This is one for the history books

Yugi: you can't defeat me, kaiba! Kaiba using chatgpt: you're not just a 3rd rate duelist, you also have a fourth rate deck

@utaracunda @TheSkepticWiz Adapting to changes *is* evolution. Evolution isn't restricted to when one species evolves into another. It's defined as any change in heritable characteristics of a biological population over time, no matter how small those changes are.

@utaracunda @TheSkepticWiz Sure! Tragopogon miscellus is a species that came into existence in the 20th century, and in a lab setting scientists produced a new species of fruitfly that was reproductively isolated from the species they started with. However, 1/2