alotta thinking

@Dogstoyesky @Maks_NAFO_FELLA @ItsTheEnforcer It's the same thing as in the 90s. The US wants the natural resources ofc but Russia doesn't just want to be a raw material supplier with no world power image and capabilities. So they might stay a hostile nation for a long time like North Korea.

@AlottaThinking @Maks_NAFO_FELLA @ItsTheEnforcer If they want to sell on without being affected by sanctions and command a higher price Russia has to appease America somehow

🇺🇸‼️ Russia discusses sanctions relief with the US for a truce without guarantees, — RBC-Ukraine citing government sources "America will receive news of silence on the front, Putin — partial sanctions relief and corresponding higher incomes. That is, in essence, such trade without any security guarantees, which cannot suit Ukrainians."

@Devils_Adequate @NOELreports Yeah every country and region has screwed up and is currently fixing problems. Bar maybe a couple exceptions.

@AlottaThinking @NOELreports Most of Europe didn't even start trying until 2022. Some got even MORE in bed with Putin after 2014. Europe screwed up and they have a long way to go in fixing the problems they created.

EU support for Ukraine since Russia’s full-scale invasion has reached €200.6 billion, including €75.2 billion in military aid, €104.6 billion for economic, social, and financial resilience, and €3.8 billion from frozen Russian assets. That surpasses the roughly $187 billion allocated by the US. #EU

@Devils_Adequate @NOELreports Ofc things are not as simple since Europe doesn't have natural resources compared to the US. Trump has just burnt 50 billion since Feb 28 but he will still help affordability hopefully. Non-simple things are normal.

@NOELreports Europe also gave Putin over $300 billion since 2022, 10 times more than the US. Doesn't sound as great then.

@Dogstoyesky @Maks_NAFO_FELLA @ItsTheEnforcer That role of being either a poorer Saudi Arabia to the US or to China is not what Putin promised the Russians though. Who knows wether they would accept. In the late 90s they rejected it and the rest is history.

@Maks_NAFO_FELLA @ItsTheEnforcer Its a fact of life that America has have influence on Russia not palling around with China anymore. Ukraine isn’t the only consideration. Realpolitik.

@FinalTelegraph @Cobratate "No longer are we bound by outdated doctrines that have only emboldened our enemies. This is about strategic clarity, where our adversaries know the cost of crossing us. It's a doctrine of peace through overwhelming capability, where the threat of retaliation is so severe,..."

Under the new administration, the landscape of global warfare has been irrevocably altered. Trump's America isn't just about bringing peace through strength; it's about redefining the very rules of engagement. The notion that we can now deploy weapons previously off-limits, including nuclear options, signals a seismic shift towards ensuring America's unmatched military superiority. This isn't about starting wars; it's about ending them before they start. The old rules, crafted by those who never truly faced the threats we do, have left us vulnerable. Trump's administration understands that to deter aggression, you must show that you're willing to use all tools at your disposal. The message is clear: challenge America at your peril. The trenches have indeed changed. No longer are we bound by outdated doctrines that have only emboldened our enemies. This is about strategic clarity, where our adversaries know the cost of crossing us. It's a doctrine of peace through overwhelming capability, where the threat of retaliation is so severe, it ensures our enemies think twice before acting. Critics decry this as warmongering, but they fail to see that true peace comes from strength, not from appeasement. The left has long pushed for disarmament, for negotiations that only served to weaken our position. Trump's policy is a return to American exceptionalism, where our military might isn't just a deterrent but a cornerstone of our foreign policy. For those who believe in a strong America, one that leads with power and wisdom, follow @FinalTelegraph . Let's ensure our nation's defense is as formidable as our resolve. #MAGA #PeaceThroughStrength #AmericanResolve

It's a brand new world under a brand new administration. THE LAWS OF WAR HAVE CHANGED. We can now use weapons we couldn't previously use. NUKES. The Trenches have changed. JOIN THE ARMY: altcoin.com

@TweetTardSavant Those are two different things. Wether seizing the Uranium is feasible without an unacceptable amount of casualties remains unanswered as of now. The other thing, the bombing out of existence is for sure not gonna happen.

@AlottaThinking Yes, the plan is to make sure muslim terrorist never have nuclear weapons. I hope he just bombs them out if existence.

German Chancellor Merz: "Germany stands ready to engage militarily to ensure the freedom of sea routes."

@dcbirdie1 @Gerashchenko_en Well actually wether George Washington existed or not, Americans would've still fought the British. Same thing with Zelensky.

@Gerashchenko_en We need to stop the abuse of the American taxpayers. We do not believe your leader is fighting for his people, he’s killing them. No accountability for what we have given to your creepy little Zelensky.

Look: 1. The Kremlin is afraid to hold a parade with military equipment on Red Square on May 9. Peskov openly admits it’s due to the threat of Ukrainian strikes. 2. Putin is asking President Trump for a ceasefire on May 9. 3. Russia’s Central Bank head Nabiullina says savings may need to be frozen and seized. 4. Russian oil depots are burning. Ukraine is going through a very difficult time. But this is where we are now. We’re not just holding on - we’re doing our job. Standing with Ukraine 🇺🇦

@TweetTardSavant All you hear from him is Iran's weak so weak they are gonna collapse like nobody has collapsed before. This is his whole plan. He never had the brains to deal with somebody that's not completely out of being competitive.

@AlottaThinking Hoping his opponent is weak? Im sorry but that isn't true. The 'everybody' you are referring to are socialist American hating Democrats.

@TweetTardSavant Only in the position he is in his type is unusual. In total he is quite usual and everybody can see through him. People prefer that instead of being skillfully manipulated. But everybody knows Trump's only plan is hoping for his opponent to be weak enough.

@AlottaThinking Yes, usually, but Trump is anything but usual.

@TweetTardSavant @WarMonitor3 Usually if the head of the more powerful country is barking louder and less civilized than their opponent it means they are in the worse position. Especially after he has been briefed about everything many times and he still barks as if he desperately has to convince somebody.

@WarMonitor3 Prediction: Trump gets US/European coalition to open up Strait of Hormuz and strengthen partnership which will deter Russian aggression. Iran will concede nuclear ambitions and open Strait within 2 weeks.

@SegalRoy_ @WarMonitor3 He along with other Europeans has voiced the exact same thing twice before. It doesn't even look like the timing even happened the way you think it did. If the quote is accurate understand that to Germans soldiers helping children across the street is "military action" to them.

@WarMonitor3 Just yesterday, Trump threatened to reduce the number of American troops stationed in Germany, and guess what? Suddenly, Germany announces that it is ready to take military action to ensure freedom of the sea lanes.😂

@SepiLupi @WarMonitor3 This "few weeks" thing has been said after a couple days in. More and more weeks have passed. Initially an economy collapse wasn't needed, now they say it is. Is there any realistic plan in place other than praying for the opponent's weakness?

@AlottaThinking @WarMonitor3 No ground units are needed, the US must continue the blockade, after a few weeks their economy will collapse. Iranians will finish the job.

Trumps advisors have told him that a nuclear deal with Iran is unlikely, so Trump has instructed them to prepare for a infinite blockade of the country until they capitulate-WSJ

@SepiLupi @WarMonitor3 The past is an interesting thing to look at. The present and reality however is the US is not willing to lose thousands of soldiers to complete a regime change. Not even the soldiers themselves are willing. It won't happen.

@AlottaThinking @WarMonitor3 The US already has lost thousands of its soldiers because of Iran, regime change is the only way to protect not only the Americans but the whole region Iran is creating proxies in Europe, Africa, south America & even in Canada! The world would be in chaos with the current regime

@ericbowenky @Maks_NAFO_FELLA If true that would be mind-bogglingly stupid. What is more concerning for Germany's security: Less American (ground) troops or a reduction of Ukraine's military strength?

@Maks_NAFO_FELLA I suspect this decision has more to do with attempting to compel Germany to withdraw support from Ukraine than US pulling units and capabilities out of NATO...

😳🇩🇪🇺🇸

@RavensUsmc @WarMonitor3 Yeah I know. But it's not necessary to understand that huge amounts of taxpayer money not being controlled in any way by anyone other than pro-fraud and pro-immigrant groups is hard to believe.

@AlottaThinking @WarMonitor3 lol. Might wanna wait till the final numbers come out. For someone called alottathinking you don’t do much.

Germany has quadrupled is annual artillery production to over 1 million rounds a year rivalling the US.

@RavensUsmc @WarMonitor3 They just declared the war has cost 25 billion to date. Maybe they tweaked some numbers and it's more. But how much Somali money has been lost? 2,5 million? 25 million? Money at too great scale doesn't just disappear in the hands of Somalis. It's not the biggest slickest group.

@AlottaThinking @WarMonitor3 We are. From the inside. Not gonna disagree or dispute that. We’re currently raiding Minnesota because of a Somali ring that has stolen millions if not billions from taxpayers. Omar and the pos governor know all about it. So what else would you like to talk about

@HeislerKla78256 @spectre_nu94515 @WarMonitor3 100% if they share your opinion on European readiness and troops then they will. And they might. They were wrong about Ukrainians. They could be right about the Baltics. And even about the Poles. Problem is Poles don't have to fight as hard bc of better equipment and NATO.

@AlottaThinking @spectre_nu94515 @WarMonitor3 You're assuming the Russians will risk it. I don't think they will.

@HeislerKla78256 @spectre_nu94515 @WarMonitor3 So if they don't destroy the Russian army at the beginning with air strikes to the point of Russia only be capable of defensive moves then European troops couldn't offer lasting resistance? Am I getting it mostly right?

@AlottaThinking @spectre_nu94515 @WarMonitor3 No, i beleive a ceasefire and a coalition force of European troops to deter Russia will be enough. The Europeans may not have prepared for all out war but they absolutely have the capability to cause untold damage to any Russian force that breaks the ceasefire.

@ipersianwarrior @WarMonitor3 I'm sure causing a Golden Age by BINGO declaring it is much less flawed and will surely work out. In hindsight things are always so obvious therefore it's a mistery why no one has come up with it before.

@AlottaThinking @WarMonitor3 Flawed analysis but whatever.

@RavensUsmc @WarMonitor3 Well often you hear that America is being taken advantage of and hence why America doesn't have the money to take care economically of its own country or something of this sort. Rings a bell?

@AlottaThinking @WarMonitor3 I’m sorry. Not sure what you’re replying to.