Oliver Bradley

@bibliosexual You forgot: - gender self-id - biological males in female prisons and shelters - men are trash - words as violence -micro-aggressions - oppression Olympics - traditional norms as patriarchal violence I could go on...

Current feminist issues: - abortion on demand and increased access - access to birth control - maternity rights and maternity leave - raising the age of consent from minors - eliminating child marriage - ending violence against women and girls You can see why men hate it.

@bibliosexual @ember__blue As you know - 96% were 16 or 17 and the average age difference was 4 years. It's still a real issue but by 2018 it was already down from 10's of thousands a year to a couple thousand.

@AutodidacDad @ember__blue And yes, conservatives in America fight against child marriage laws (300,000 children, mostly girls were married to mostly adult men in the US between 2000 and 2018, with victims being as young as 10) and are fighting against birth control, voting and legal rights, and jobs.

Bear in mind that when men say they love women, often what they mean is that they love sex and having their meals cooked. "I don't hate women, I just hate feminism for brainwashing the stupid pretty things into thinking they want more from life than serving me"

@bibliosexual @ember__blue large percentages of male voters approved suffrage amendments. The 19th Amendment itself passed through overwhelmingly male legislatures and was ratified by male-dominated state bodies. I singled out 4th wave as a mess.

@AutodidacDad @ember__blue You just said men believed in the first wave (untrue, based on history) and now it's second wave (untrue, based on history and the present), Third wave feminism has had a huge emphasis on domestic abuse and violence against women. Fourth wave is still ongoing.

@lorahmoe it indicates an ideological framework that reduces individuals to their group identity and assigns collective guilt; a secular faith substitute in a post-religious age. How do you get someone out of cult?

If you’re a man, please respond. If you’re a woman, ask the men in your life and report back: What is your initial gut reaction when you hear a woman say, “I hate men”?

@MindOfHeadking Stupid is as stupid does.

When jokes turn into divorce.

@bibliosexual @ember__blue Massive strawman. No one here wants child marriage, spousal rape, or to strip women of bank accounts, jobs, birth control, or legal rights. You've made it to 2nd wave. None of those are part of 4th wave.

@AutodidacDad @ember__blue My man, saying that men want to be able to marry children, rape and abuse their wives, prevent women from having bank accounts or getting loans, prevent women from taking jobs, outlaw birth control and abortion, and take their children away from them if they leave is not good.

You walk up to your computer and see this screen. Your next move?

@bibliosexual @ember__blue If supporting equality while calling out denial of biology is “mentally in the 1800s,” then sign me up for the time machine. Most men love women. That’s exactly why we reject the version of feminism making so many of them miserable. Reality > slogans.

@AutodidacDad @ember__blue So men are mentally in the 1800s. Sounds about right.

@bibliosexual @ember__blue Which wave? Most men have no problem with 1st wave feminism (legal and political equality). 4th wave has gone off the rails.

@AutodidacDad @ember__blue No man who hates feminism loves women

@SatireSquadHQ "Canada didn’t just fall — it sprinted face-first into the pavement while apologizing for the sidewalk’s colonial history." Truth is the best satire.

Harvard Report: Canada Dumbest Nation Alive Cambridge, MA — In a bombshell 2026 Global Stupidity Index released Tuesday, Harvard researchers crowned Canada the undisputed Dumbest Nation Alive, edging out perennial runners-up like North Korea and California. The report, titled “How One Polite Country Engineered Its Own Lobotomy,” cites a perfect storm of self-inflicted retardation that began the moment Justin Trudeau slithered into power in 2015 and somehow got worse under his banker cosplay successor, Mark Carney. “Canada didn’t just fall — it sprinted face-first into the pavement while apologizing for the sidewalk’s colonial history,” said lead researcher Dr. Harlan McBraindead. “Every metric — economic suicide, cultural brain-melt, demographic replacement — screams ‘we hate ourselves and want to die.’” The Liberals, those tireless champions of DEI quotas, gender fairy tales, and open-border masochism, have turned the once-functional country into a glittering dumpster fire. Mass immigration? Check — cities now resemble failed UN refugee camps where English is optional and taxpayer-funded housing is mandatory. Gender ideology? Check — biological males dominate women’s sports, prisons, and locker rooms while anyone noticing gets hauled before a human rights tribunal for “hate facts.” DEI hiring? Check — competence was quietly retired years ago in favor of checking every box except “qualified.” Voters, described by the study as “the most obviously mentally challenged electorate on Earth,” keep re-electing these clowns with the glassy-eyed devotion of a cult. Why? Because they’ve swallowed the gospel that everything wrong is Donald Trump’s fault. Housing crisis? Trump. Inflation? Trump. Fentanyl zombies in every major city? Trump. The fact Canada has been in economic and cultural free-fall since 2015 is apparently irrelevant — facts are colonial, after all. Enter Mark Carney, the Liberals’ shiny new messiah, elected on a pure platform of Trump Derangement Syndrome. He campaigned as the only adult who could “deal with Trump.” Result? Canada is now the only country on the planet without a new trade deal while even Mexico and the EU walked away with wins. Carney’s big move: more virtue-signaling speeches, more carbon taxes, and more apologies. The Harvard team called it “peak retarded diplomacy.” At press time, Liberal strategists were reportedly drafting a new national slogan: “Sorry, eh? Please keep us stupid.”

@AmericaPapaBear Teach your kids respect or someone will teach them for you.

MUST SEE: Black bus passenger SPITS on the bus driver and the driver RESPONDED BACK! Footage shows the driver handling the passenger for the disrespect! Do you think he took it too far?

@jaynitx The Terman study "failure" group were not failures at all. The group as a whole had far higher education and income than the general population. High IQ was strongly predictive of life outcomes versus the broader population.

In the 1920s, a Stanford psychologist tracked genius children for 50 years. Malcolm Gladwell breaks down what he discovered: Rich families → successful. Poor families → failures. Not average. Failures. Genius-level IQs that produced nothing. He spent 60 minutes at Microsoft explaining why we're wrong about success: The psychologist was named Terman. He gave IQ tests to 250,000 California schoolchildren. He identified the top 0.1%. Kids with IQs of 140 and above. His hypothesis: these children would become the leaders of academia, industry, and politics. He tracked them. And tracked them. For decades. The results split into three groups. The top 15% achieved real prominence. The middle group had average, moderately successful professional lives. And the bottom group? By any measure, failures. The difference wasn't personality. Wasn't habits. Wasn't work ethic. It was simple: the successful geniuses came from wealthy households. The failures came from poor families. Poverty is such a powerful constraint that it can reduce a one-in-a-billion brain to a lifetime of worse than mediocrity. There's a concept called "capitalization rate." It asks a simple question: what percentage of people who are capable of doing something actually end up doing that thing? In inner city Memphis, only 1 in 6 kids with athletic scholarships actually go to college. If our capitalization rate for sports in the inner city is 16%, imagine how low it must be for everything else. Here's something stranger. Gladwell read the birth dates of the 2007 Czech Junior Hockey Team: January 3rd. January 3rd. January 12th. February 8th. February 10th. February 17th. February 20th. February 24th. March 5th. March 10th. March 26th... 11 of the 20 players were born in January, February, or March. This isn't unique to the Czechs. Every elite hockey team in the world shows the same pattern. Every elite soccer team too. Why? The eligibility cutoff for youth leagues is January 1st. When you're 10 years old, a kid born in January has 10 months of maturity on a kid born in October. That's 3 or 4 inches of height. The difference between clumsy and coordinated. So we look at a group of 10 year olds, pick the "best" ones, give them special coaching, extra practice, more games. We think we're identifying talent. We're just identifying the oldest. Then we give the oldest more opportunities, and 10 years later they really are the best. Self-fulfilling prophecy. The capitalization rate for hockey talent born in the second half of the year? Close to zero. We're leaving half of all potential hockey players on the table because of an arbitrary date on a calendar. Kids born in the youngest cohort of their school class are 11% less likely to go to college. 11% of human potential squandered because we organize elementary school without reference to biological maturity. Now here's the part about math. Asian kids dramatically outperform Western kids in mathematics. The gap is enormous and consistent across decades of testing. Some people say it's genetic. It's not. It's attitudinal. When Asian kids face a math problem, they believe effort will solve it. When Western kids face a math problem, they believe the answer depends on innate ability they either have or don't. Here's the proof. The international math tests include a 120-question survey. It asks about study habits, parental support, attitudes. It's so long most kids don't finish it. A researcher named Erling Boe decided to rank countries by what percentage of survey questions their kids completed. Then he compared it to the ranking of countries by math performance. The correlation was 0.98. In the history of social science, there has never been a correlation that high. If you want to know how good a country is at math, you don't need to ask any math questions. Just make kids sit down and focus on a task for an extended period of time. If they can do it, they're good at math. Why do Asian cultures have this attitude? Gladwell's theory: rice farming. His European ancestors in medieval England worked about 1,000 hours a year. Dawn to noon, five days a week. Winters off. Lots of holidays. A peasant in South China or Japan in the same period worked 3,000 hours a year. Rice farming isn't just harder than wheat farming. It's a completely different relationship with work. There's a Chinese proverb: "A man who works dawn to dusk 360 days a year will not go hungry." His English ancestors would have said: "A man who works 175 days a year, dawn to 11, may or may not be hungry." If your culture does that for a thousand years, it becomes part of your makeup. When your kids sit down to face a calculus problem, that legacy of persistence translates perfectly. Now consider distance running. In Kenya, there are roughly a million schoolboys between 10 and 17 running 10 to 12 miles a day. In the United States, that number is probably 5,000. Our capitalization rate for distance running is less than 1%. Kenya's is probably 95%. The difference isn't genetic. The difference is what the culture values and where it spends its attention. Here's the most fascinating finding. 30% of American entrepreneurs have been diagnosed with a profound learning disability. Richard Branson is dyslexic. Charles Schwab is dyslexic. John Chambers can barely read his own email. This isn't coincidence. Their entrepreneurialism is a direct function of their disability. How do you succeed if you can't read or write from early childhood? You learn to delegate. You become a great oral communicator. You become a problem solver because your entire life is one big problem. You learn to lead. 80% of dyslexic entrepreneurs were captain of a high school sports team. Versus 30% of non-dyslexic entrepreneurs. By the time they enter the real world, they've spent their whole life practicing the four skills at the core of entrepreneurial success: delegation, oral communication, problem solving, and leadership. Ask them what role dyslexia played in their success and they don't say it was an obstacle. They say it's the reason they succeeded. A disadvantage that became an advantage. Here's what Gladwell wants you to understand: When we see differences in success, our default explanation is differences in ability. We forget how much poverty, stupidity, and attitude constrain what people can become. We refuse to admit that our own arbitrary rules are leaving talent on the table. We cling to naive beliefs that our meritocracies are fair. The capitalization argument is liberating. It says you don't look at a struggling group and conclude they're incapable. It says problems that look genetic or innate are often just failures of exploitation. It says we can make a profound difference in how well people turn out. If we choose to pay attention. This 60 minute Microsoft talk will teach you more about success than every self-help book you've ever read combined. Bookmark this & give it an hour today, no matter what.

@guideforlovers Simpin' ain't easy.

Women go on girls' trips for one reason only: S*x with strangers

@DrRitaDed Here's an idea - read a book about economics before spouting nonsense. Sorry gender studies doesn't pay but it doesn't mean you can steal other peoples' money.

Here's an idea. Tax the rich. Anyone earning over 180k per year should get taxed at 100% No one needs to be earning that much. Redistribute the wealth.

Men like "thing-oriented" fields, women like "people-oriented" fields. Feminists want equal representation in high-paying fields (STEM) but are not naturally interested in these fields. The don't care when women dominate high paying fields (vets, lawyers) or when men dominate dangerous jobs (mining, logging). Women want safety because of biological differences in strength and aggression. Independence is an illusion provided by men. You still need us to keep you safe and to keep the air conditioning on. So yes - you ignore biology.

@AutodidacDad @ss_sabat @evxding @ember__blue and also, no, feminists don't ignore biology. women know VERY well that we can give birth. and we know VERY well men are physically strong. feminists want to be equal in terms of living - we want jobs, we want independence, we want safety. how is biology relevant to this?

@evxding @zeraiya @ss_sabat @ember__blue Men want to reproduce and need women to do so. Are you amazed to find out that women have used sex as a means to wield power throughout time?

@AutodidacDad @zeraiya @ss_sabat @ember__blue how on earth is giving birth an advantage over men 😭 they’ve abused this fact for centuries to enforce sexual slavery

@noiseykid @ember__blue Pointing out feminism ignores biology isn't equating anything. Biology doesn't erase free will but it does shape preferences and constraints. Young progressive women are unconstrained by and the most hostile toward men. The are in a mental health crisis as well.

@AutodidacDad @ember__blue False equivalence is always present, as demonstrated here. Though there's another classic: the "biology removes freewill" trope.

You are confusing mutual service with symmetric sharing of domestic tasks. As an example, for hundreds of years men typically handled heavy field work, plowing, animal husbandry, repairs, and building. Women managed cooking, cleaning, childcare, gardening and food preservation. Feminism insists that interdependent roles serving the family unit is unequal but this is a tall assumption.

@AutodidacDad @ember__blue Nope. Feminism is exactly what started mutual service. But even now, women are STILL doing more cooking and cleaning even when both partners work full time.

@elonmusk People need purpose or we need to become batteries for the robots.

Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.

@SassySouthBlond What is sad is pretending that everyone’s grandma was trapped in an abusive relationship. This is all narrative and no substance.

Feminism didn’t dismantle the family, it gave women the ability to leave abusive, unequal ones. Being able to work, own property, vote, and say no to mistreatment isn’t hating men it’s having basic human self determination. Motherhood is meaningful when it’s a choice, not an obligation. What’s actually sad is romanticizing a time when many women were trapped with no way out of abusive marriages. No, society hasn’t utterly failed women or men, it gave women a choice at a different path. Having options isn’t failure. It’s freedom. There isn’t “angry young women” today as this person wrote in this book there is “angry young men” who can no longer have control over women and use the state to do it. If young men want to have a chance with young women in the future they are going to have to build relationships with them providing and meeting their emotional needs so women will want to meet their physical and emotional needs. Relationships and marriages are a two way street not a one way street of abuse and servitude.