Blake Moore

The American political arena isn’t a game of chess between equals. It’s a rigged slaughterhouse where one side gets to swing the cleaver and the other is expected to thank them for the privilege of bleeding. Cheating is fine...if you’re a Democrat. Authoritarianism is fine...if you’re a Democrat. Lawfare...the deliberate weaponization of courts, agencies, and statutes as political scalpels...is not merely fine, it’s the highest form of strategy if you’re a Democrat. This isn’t “both sides” hypocrisy. This is asymmetric pathology. The modern Democratic machine operates from a core psychological defect: narcissistic moral entitlement fused with authoritarian control needs. They have convinced themselves that their vision of the future is so morally pristine that any violation of norms, laws, or democratic guardrails is not corruption...it’s prophylaxis. Rig the election? Necessary. Censor dissent? Public health. Prosecute political opponents while shielding your own? Rule of law. The ends don’t just justify the means; the means dissolve the moment they inconvenience the anointed. Facts are stubborn: documented ballot harvesting operations in key urban centers, Big Tech suppression coordinated with federal agencies, selective enforcement of campaign finance laws that magically never touch the right people, and lawfare campaigns timed to kneecap candidates...these are not conspiracy theories. They are observable, repeatable patterns of power maintenance by a party that views the Constitution as an obstacle rather than a covenant. And the Republicans? They are not the opposition. They are the designated losers. Spineless, gutless, invertebrate custodians of performative principle. They lack the will, the killer instinct, the raw, primal “I don’t give a fuck, I will burn it down before I let you win” ferocity required to meet fire with napalm. While Democrats treat politics as existential war, Republicans treat it as a gentleman’s debate club where losing with dignity is somehow noble. Result? Democrats can do literally anything...steal, lie, persecute, censor, mandate, rig...because they understand the one immutable law of power: if you seize it and never let go, the rules become whatever you say they are. Republicans are not allowed to play the same game. They’re not even allowed to acknowledge the game is rigged. One stray tweet, one unscripted rally, one hint of actual resistance, and the entire regime apparatus...media, DOJ, NGOs, tech...descends like locusts while their own “leadership” clutches pearls and whispers about “norms.” This is not sustainable. A republic cannot survive when one party operates as an authoritarian cartel and the other as its willing doormat. The pathology is terminal unless the weak are replaced by the ruthless. Nature doesn’t reward the spineless. It devours them. And right now, the Republican Party is begging to be devoured. 💀⚔️

You are witnessing a CIA color revolution in real-time within the borders of the U.S. It is time to defund and dissolve the CIA!

Why is it that the late-night ballot dump ALWAYS favors the Democrats? Have you EVER seen a late-night Republican ballot dump?

Just gonna say it There is no way the Biden FBI was working so closely with the SPLC and didn't know about these paid informants staging hate crimes That's how you know this was a federal cutout operation

We vote for Republicans but apparently we aren’t represented by anybody. Failing to pass the SAVE Act is the most disgraceful inaction I’ve ever seen from a political party.

Pollak’s Two Rules of American Politics: 1. Republicans never win, except by surprise. 2. Democrats cannot govern, except by mistake.

@DavidPoulden @JovanHPulitzer We now have been conditioned that this, along with crime, lack of safety, and corrupt politicians funneling our money to themselves is somehow the normal way to live.

How culturally enriching...

I support birthright citizenship. I mean actual birthright citizenship. My children -- who were born in this country to American parents, who have ancestors who've fought in every war since the 1700s, who are tied to this land by blood and heritage -- have a birthright. A birthright to live in the country that was built for them, enjoying the safety and security and prosperity that their ancestors intended to pass down to them. That's the only kind of birthright we should be talking about. On the other hand, the child of an illegal immigrant, whose parents showed up 10 seconds ago to exploit a loophole, who have no ties to this country or even any real affection for it or loyalty to it, has no birthright here. The birthright belongs to my children. Not the illegal immigrant's child. It's completely insane how we've flipped the concept of "birthright" upside down.

Republicans, if you're not going to end the filibuster and pack the Supreme Court, then propose an Amendment that mandates the filibuster and fixes the number of Justices at 9. If Dems oppose that, then guess what? They're going to end the filibuster and pack the Supreme Court.

Once you realize this everything makes sense… The Republicans are a party with real support and fake representation and the Democrats are a party with fake support and real representation. Facts.

@RolandGunnTN SHHH!

@tulum_a @BubCasto @theobjectivist But what about when that effort is unnecessary?

@BubCasto @theobjectivist Most of the labour has a meaning, it's the valuation/validation and flexibility that is the problem.

This is the philosophical bankruptcy of a brilliant engineer laid bare in a single post. Musk proposes that the government pay people not to work because machines will do the working for them. This is not a new idea. It is the old idea of something for nothing, repackaged in silicon. Start with the economics. Mises demonstrated that production must precede consumption. You cannot distribute wealth that has not been created by someone. If AI produces the goods, someone still owns the AI, maintains it, directs it, and decides what it produces. That is not a post-work society. That is a society in which the producers have changed tools. The question Musk refuses to ask is: by what right does the government seize the output of those producers to mail checks to those who did not produce it? "There will not be inflation" because production will exceed the money supply increase. This assumes the government will print only enough and never more. This is the assumption of every inflationist in history. Hayek called this the pretense of knowledge. Mises demonstrated that no central authority can calculate economic outcomes for a dynamic economy because it lacks the pricing information that only free markets generate. This is not a technical problem to be solved. It is an impossibility built into the nature of centralized control. Now the moral question Musk avoids entirely. Man survives by using his mind. Work is not a burden to be eliminated. It is the means by which a rational being sustains his life, creates value, and achieves purpose. A man who receives a check for existing is not free. He is a dependent. He has been severed from the process that gives his life meaning. Rand would say Musk is proposing to turn every American into a ward of the state, fed and housed by the productive, with no purpose and no self-respect. Mike Lee asks the right question: why would you trust the government to do this? But the deeper question is: why would you want any institution, government or otherwise, to replace the individual's responsibility for his own survival? That is not compassion. That is the destruction of the human spirit performed with a direct deposit. Musk builds rockets because he refused to accept that space was closed to private enterprise. He should apply that same principle to the economy: trust free individuals to adapt, innovate, and create new forms of value, as they have after every technological revolution in history. The printing press did not create permanent unemployment. Neither did the steam engine, electricity, the automobile, or the internet. Each one destroyed old jobs and created new ones that no one could have predicted. AI will do the same, if the government stays out of the way. Universal High Income is not the future. It is the end of the future, paid for monthly.

Congress is the most representative branch of the federal government and the least functional for the same reason - there is no coherent ‘people’ to represent today. That’s what closed borders and birthright citizenship are about - a rearguard action against total disintegration.

@NYPop18 @HansMahncke 😂

@BAMMD1985 @HansMahncke Lawyers have a strict code of conduct. It's a very-heavily regulated profession.

In isolation, the Eastman case is horrific. It effectively stripped a man of his ability to earn a living for the “crime” of giving legal advice. But in context, it is worse, because it shows how lawfare now punishes people simply for carrying out their professional duties.

@NYPop18 @HansMahncke If lawyers were disbarred for lying, there would be none of them.

@HansMahncke He wasn’t disbarred for giving legal advice. It was for lying

@RodneyG85039491 @ChrisMoore15915 @HansMahncke And an admission that they stole the election.

@ChrisMoore15915 @HansMahncke Eastman had the balls & knowlege to bring a constitutional challenge to the 2020 election. If not for the J6 riot that interrupted Congress, it might well have worked. This is a warning to anyone else who has thoughts of doing it, & this is only the highest profile example.

@HansMahncke It’s also an admission of guilt. They stole the election, and if you get in their way, this is what happens to you. It’s a figurative head on a pike at the city gate.

@rpeterson2317 @chadfelixg 😂 sure!

@BAMMD1985 @chadfelixg There is no verified fraud

Pretending to or genuinely not understanding this is obnoxious. The states elect the President. We are the United States of America. If you want to eliminate the states and the Senate, you can approach abolishing the Electoral College. Democracy silences 49% of the population.

@WitcoTasunke @KurtSchlichter 🤡

@BAMMD1985 @KurtSchlichter Holy throne, people in Tennessee are dumb.

This is an absolute ridiculous argument. Eastman was disbarred because Democrats didn’t like his politics. Just tell me what the rule is and be prepared to live with it.