고정된 트윗
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥
8.8K posts
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
Satoshi ran Bitcoin alone for 2.5 years before stepping back.
The founder of Bittensor just confirmed he is doing the same thing, on purpose, with a deadline.
18 months to true decentralisation.
@opentensor $TAO
GIF
const@const_reborn
English
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
Barry Silbert bought Bitcoin at $7.
He built Grayscale from nothing.
He turned DCG into a 300-company crypto empire.
Now he's saying $TAO is his Bitcoin moment.
Here's what he said that most people missed:
"For Bitcoin OGs, we are circa 2012 to 2013 right now."
At a $1.5 billion market cap.
He's not guessing. He's pattern matching to the only playbook that turned a $7 bet into the largest crypto asset manager in the world.
The fair launch comparison hit different.
No VC round. No team allocation. No foundation getting rich before you.
Just a white paper turned into code, launched into the world.
Exactly like Bitcoin.
Same 21 million supply cap.
Same halving cycle.
Same organic community that had to earn their way in.
Then he explained the subnet flywheel.
88 subnets. Each one solving a different problem. Each one with its own token.
But every single subnet token trades in and out of TAO.
So when any subnet wins, TAO wins.
He called it something I had to read twice.
"There is no other project in crypto with the same dynamic."
On Ethereum and Solana, ecosystem tokens create zero value for the base layer.
On Bittensor, every subnet success flows directly back to TAO.
Then came the boldest statement.
Right now $500 million in TAO emissions are up for grabs annually as incentives for compute, data, and model providers.
As TAO price rises, that becomes $1 billion. $5 billion. $10 billion.
At $10 billion in annual incentives, you've built the most powerful intelligence coordination network in human history.
His mission with Yuma is simple.
Find the Coinbase of Bittensor.
Find the Chain Analysis of Bittensor.
Find the BitGo of Bittensor.
Infrastructure first. Same playbook. Different era.
His boldest prediction?
Bittensor could be a better version of Bitcoin.
Instead of spending $10 to $12 billion a year to secure a ledger, imagine spending that same amount to incentivise a global network of people solving the world's hardest problems.
Same economics. Bigger mission.
The people who read the docs always buy before the people who read the price.
English
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
"It's a turkey. Everything goes well until it doesn't."
One of Bittensor's sharpest minds just used that exact phrase to describe what could happen to every passive $TAO root staker.
Here is why he might be right, and why the founder thinks he isn't.
The phrase comes from a 90 minute live debate between Jacob Steeves, founder of Bittensor, and Striker, a long-time validator and critic of the proposed Root Reborn update.
The turkey metaphor describes a specific pattern.
Returns look great. Trust builds. Capital piles in.
Then one day, without warning, the entire thing unwinds and the people who never understood what they were actually holding lose far more than they realised was ever at risk.
Striker was not describing a hypothetical. He was describing what he believes will happen to TAO holders staking on root once validators gain the power to direct yield into baskets of their own choosing.
Here is the mechanism that triggered the warning.
Right now, when you stake TAO on root, your yield comes in alpha tokens that get automatically sold and converted back into TAO every 360 blocks. It is robotic.
It happens whether the market wants to sell or not.
Root Reborn proposes removing that automatic sale.
Instead, validators would direct your yield into a basket of alpha tokens they choose, where it can compound at a significantly higher rate before you ever claim it.
Jacob's argument is direct. Alpha tokens yield five to ten times more than TAO.
Letting that yield compound inside a basket rather than getting force-sold immediately means stakers earn meaningfully more over time.
Striker's counter is just as direct. The moment you hand a validator the power to choose where your yield flows, you have made every root staker a passive investor in someone else's judgment, whether they realise it or not.
Here is the sentence from the debate that should make you pause, regardless of which side you land on.
Jacob himself, describing the mechanism in his own words, said: "All validators are effectively running a hedge fund. Bottom line."
He did not deny it. He reframed it as a feature, calling validators yield optimisers instead.
Striker's response cut straight to the implication. "I don't want a basket of stocks. You can choose."
That is the actual disagreement underneath all the technical language.
Not whether the yield mechanics work on paper.
Whether forcing every passive holder into a managed basket, even an optional one, quietly normalises a level of trust most people never agreed to give.
Here is why the turkey metaphor specifically lands so hard.
Striker pointed to two real subnets, 115 and 118, where teams allegedly bought their own subnet emissions and sold them back into their own pool to extract value.
He argued that Root Reborn could make this kind of extraction easier to execute and harder to detect in real time, because a validator could direct yield toward a subnet they control, watch the basket's apparent performance skyrocket, attract more stakers chasing the yield, and quietly extract value the entire time.
Jacob's defence rests on transparency.
Every basket is visible on-chain. Historical performance is trackable.
Validators can be limited to a minimum number of subnet allocations, making concentrated extraction structurally harder.
But transparency after the fact does not prevent the unwind.
It just lets you watch it happen in real time, the same way you watch a turkey being fattened before the moment everything changes.
The most honest exchange of the entire debate came near the end.
Jacob asked Striker directly: will root stakers make more money or less money under this update?
Striker's answer was layered.
Short term, more. Long term, once leakage to bad actors compounds, potentially less, especially for the unsophisticated majority who will see a high, attractive yield number and chase it without ever understanding the mechanism generating it.
That is the actual stakes of this proposal in one sentence.
Not whether the yield number looks bigger in the short term.
Whether the people staking TAO today understand what they are actually trusting their capital to, before the moment the music stops.
This proposal is not live on-chain yet. It exists currently as a PR under active community review.
The investors paying attention to this debate before it executes will not need to explain their position after it does.
English
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
Everyone arguing about the Bittensor Root Reborn proposal is missing the actual numbers.
The current system force sells 7200 TAO of subnet alpha every single day.
That is over 1.8 million dollars in automatic sell pressure, daily, whether the market wants it or not.
Root Reborn does not create a new risk. It removes an existing one.
Validators already curate flows informally through baskets like this.
The proposal just makes that visible and on chain instead of hidden inside protocol code.
The real fight is not collusion or regulation.
It is about who becomes the largest recurring buyer in Bittensor history.
Verdict: this trades invisible forced selling for visible accountable buying.
That trade favors stakers, not validators.
Who else sees this.
const@const_reborn
English
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
Guess other researchers spent the necessary ~5 minutes to jailbreak Fable.
Oopsy.
Polymarket@Polymarket
NEW: Amazon researchers are reportedly behind the jailbreak report that led to the U.S. crackdown on Anthropic’s top models.
English
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
Everyone can find some exploits these days. How do you know you're finding all of them? Is your protocol still secure as models get better?
For Bitsec, we align incentives to continuously optimize for coverage, cost, and speed. Initial findings show Bitsec scans has better coverage and much cheaper than Fable / Mythos, but we take days compared to hours.
Comprehensive benchmarking with Fable could be costly like ~$5k-$10k, is it worth running?
Bitsec | Bittensor Subnet 60 τ@bitsecai
English
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
Bittensor is the main thing I’m watching at @proofoftalk.
The subnet conversation is moving from CT speculation into real institutional interest now.
Decentralized intelligence, open markets for machine learning, subnet economies, this is the part of crypto that actually feels like it can matter at scale.
Most people still underestimate how big that shift is.
Feels like $TAO is entering its serious capital era.
English
The Fact He Gave This Speech While Dying Tells You Everything About Him. youtube.com/shorts/pqqFBdo… via @YouTube
YouTube
English
@Yizhiyangfund The good thing is
long term conviction is better than short term flipping
Let’s wait and see ✍️💪💪💪
English
CRYPTOB8566🔥🔥🔥 리트윗함
Six weeks ago, Covenant AI dumped $10 million in TAO and declared Bittensor centralised.
$650 million in market cap gone in six hours.
Here is what happened next.
70% of $TAO supply never moved.
Community miners rebuilt all three abandoned subnets from open source code with zero instructions from any founder.
The chain never missed a single block.
$43 million in real AI revenue confirmed for Q1.
Conviction upgrade shipped. Silent exits now impossible on-chain.
Teutonic targeting a 1 trillion parameter training run before June ends.
Both founders on the Louvre stage in 9 days. $18 trillion AUM in the room.
Grayscale and Bitwise both filed spot TAO ETFs. August decision window.
Price is at $270. Higher lows since $155 in January.
The attack failed.
The network did not notice.
@opentensor
English