9/11 Consensus Panel

38.2K posts

9/11 Consensus Panel banner
9/11 Consensus Panel

9/11 Consensus Panel

@Consensus911

The 23-member 9/11 Consensus Panel offers peer-reviewed statements, based on expert independent opinion, of best evidence opposing the official 9/11 story.

International 가입일 Nisan 2013
1.3K 팔로잉5.5K 팔로워
고정된 트윗
9/11 Consensus Panel
9/11 Consensus Panel@Consensus911·
The 23-member 9/11 Consensus Panel uses a "best evidence" medical model to evaluate 48 official claims about 9/11: consensus911.org
English
32
40
81
0
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
Earth Hippy 🌎🕊️💚
“HOW DARE YOU SPEAK LIKE THIS” -Tucker Carlson to Donald Trump One of the most prominent right-wing voices has broken away from Trump, directly criticising him.
English
2.3K
15.2K
56.1K
1.9M
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
Blake S. Taylor Investigations 🚫
John Kiriakou says going back to the 80’s everytime an Israeli prime minister would come to the White House they would ask the American president to bomb Iran. All said no, except Trump.
English
423
3.1K
9.7K
64.6K
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
Richard Gage, AIA, Architect
Richard Gage, AIA, Architect@RichardGage_911·
[RG911Team] The US government has a track record of covering up explosions that killed Americans. Just look at the research of Dr. David Ray Griffin, who documented the dozens of 9/11 first responders who reported explosions in the World Trade Center. From his 2006 article “Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories” ⬇️ “There was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.” –Firefighter Richard Banaciski “I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?” –Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory “[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear ‘Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop’.” –Paramedic Daniel Rivera The above quotations come from a collection of 9/11 oral histories that, although recorded by the Fire Department of New York (FDNY) at the end of 2001, were publicly released only on August 12, 2005. Prior to that date, very few Americans knew the content of these accounts or even the fact that they existed. Why have we not known about them until recently? Part of the answer is that the city of New York would not release them until it was forced to do so. Early in 2002, the New York Times requested copies under the freedom of information act, but Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s administration refused. So the Times, joined by several families of 9/11 victims, filed suit. After a long process, the city was finally ordered by the New York Court of Appeals to release the records (with some exceptions and redactions allowed). Included were oral histories, in interview form, provided by 503 firefighters and medical workers. 1)Emergency Medical Services had become a division within the Fire Department. 2) The Times then made these oral histories publicly available. 3) Once the content of these testimonies is examined, it is easy to see why persons concerned to protect the official story about 9/11 would try to keep them hidden. By suggesting that explosions were occurring in the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers, they pose a challenge to the official account of 9/11, according to which the towers were caused to collapse solely by the impact of the airplanes and the resulting fires. In any case, now that the oral histories have finally been released, it is time for Americans and the world in general to see what these brave men and women reported about that fateful day. If this information forces a reevaluation of the official story about 9/11, better now than later. That said, it must be added that although these oral histories are of great significance, they do not contain the first reports of explosions in the Twin Towers. Such reports–from firefighters, reporters, and people who had worked in the towers—started becoming available right after 9/11. These reports, however, were not widely publicized by the mainstream press and, as a result, have for the most part been known only within the “9/11 truth movement,” which has focused on evidence that seems inconsistent with the official story. ———- Read the whole article in the link in the comment below ⬇️
English
7
184
397
8.6K
9/11 Consensus Panel
9/11 Consensus Panel@Consensus911·
BIG NEWS on the 9/11 front!
⚡️🌎 World News 🌐⚡️@ferozwala

BOMBSHELL Email Ties Ghislaine Maxwell To 9/11 "Shadow Commission on 9/11." #EpsteinFiles #USA 📌Newly discovered portions of Epstein's files reveal that Ghislaine Maxwell was called by Edward J. Epstein to a secret "Shadow Commission on 9/11." Edward J. Epstein was an investigative journalist best known for his 1966 book "Inquest." He was a critic of the Warren Commission, which investigated the assassination of John F. Kennedy.

English
0
1
3
107
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
F. A. Hayek Quotes
F. A. Hayek Quotes@FAHayekSays·
Few have defended freedom as consistently and courageously as Thomas Sowell 🗽 Please award Sowell the Presidential Medal of Freedom while he’s still with us! @POTUS
English
169
1.4K
6.1K
404.6K
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
J. Keven Hofeling
J. Keven Hofeling@HofelingJ42497·
ZXX
0
1
2
91
Scott Ritter
Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter·
This is an article I wrote shortly after attending the Defender of the Fatherland Day celebration at the Russian Embassy on February 23. Again, judge for yourself: American patriot, or controlled Russian agent? globalresearch.ca/give-peace-cha…
English
23
70
321
19.7K
Scott Ritter
Scott Ritter@RealScottRitter·
The FBI has accused me of behaving as a foreign agent operating in violation of the Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA). They focused on an article I published on my Substack on February 28, 2023. They claim I was directed by Russia to publish this article. This is absurd. I did meet with Russian officials at the Russian Embassy on February 20, where I briefed them on travel I was planning conducting in Russia in the coming months. The purpose of this briefing was to make sure the Russian government did not misconstrue my trip as a cover for espionage—I was, after all, a former intelligence officer with a history of work in the former Soviet Union. I also spoke in depth about the importance of this trip as a means to empower myself with the knowledge and information necessary to combat the problem of Russophobia in America today. I informed the Russian officials that I planned on addressing Russophobia in my writing and talks. The FBI is under the impression that, in pursuing this topic, I was somehow being directed and/or controlled by the Russian government. I would direct their, and the broader audience, direction to an article I published in Consortium News on February 14, 2023–six days before the Russian Embassy meeting. Read my admonitions about the dangers of Russophobia as it relates to the possibility of nuclear war. And decide for yourself whether my feelings came from the heart of a patriotic American concerned about the direction the country he loves was taking, or an agent of the Russian government, acting on their instructions to unduly influence the minds of an unwitting American public. consortiumnews.com/2023/02/14/sco…
English
113
248
995
58.8K
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
Global Research
Global Research@CrGlobalization·
#BRICS Settlement Network (BSN), a multilateral settlement infrastructure designed to complement existing international payment systems, is based on a collateralized settlement asset, called UNIT, intended exclusively for inter-central bank operations. globalresearch.ca/brics-settleme…
Global Research tweet media
English
0
1
2
238
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
Jeremy Corbyn
Jeremy Corbyn@jeremycorbyn·
The US has launched an unprovoked and illegal attack on Venezuela. This is a brazen attempt to secure control over Venezuelan natural resources. It is an act of war that puts the lives of millions of people at risk — and should be condemned by anyone who believes in sovereignty and international law.
English
8.7K
15.9K
57.8K
2.6M
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
Intl. Center for 9/11 Justice
Intl. Center for 9/11 Justice@ic911justice·
Good on @georgegalloway for mentioning “staged pretexts.” 24 years ago they needed the staged pretext of the 9/11 false flag. In the wake of that deception, which even most anti-war commentators are still too cowardly to challenge, they no longer need plausible pretexts.
George Galloway@georgegalloway

The capture of Maduro is a stunning victory for @realDonaldTrump and a humiliating defeat for everyone else. Including all others in the crosshairs of an empire which no longer feels the need to make excuses or stage pretexts #Venezuela

English
1
3
14
990
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
Shoestring 9/11
Shoestring 9/11@shoestring911·
Why was the response to the 9/11 hijackings so slow? When Flight 11 crashed into the World Trade Center, fighter jets from Otis Air Base "were not even in the air yet"; they only took off "seven minutes later" and "it would take them 32 minutes to reach New York."
English
7
7
32
1.3K
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
Andrew Bridgen
Andrew Bridgen@ABridgen·
On 9/11 how were the BBC able to announce that building 7 had collapsed 26 minutes before it actually did ? Do you still watch their propaganda ?
English
177
1.1K
3.5K
70.2K
9/11 Consensus Panel 리트윗함
🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉
🇬🇧 The Management of Ruin: Creating Monsters To Destroy Societies Resisting Its Order NATO was the cage Britain built to control American power, but in 1956, that system cracked in the Suez Crisis. President Eisenhower told Britain and France: “Get the hell out... or we’ll dump your currency.” Within days, the invasion collapsed. For the first time, London could not command its American “subordinate." Harley Schlanger, president of the LaRouche Organization, explains the pivotal adaptation: “How do you create a gang-counter-gang situation so that you don’t have to use your forces?” Realizing it could no longer count on the US as a blank check, Britain doubled down on a more aggressive approach: manipulating America into fighting its colonial wars. The Vietnam War was the prototype — a French/British colonial struggle that, after JFK’s assassination, became an American tragedy. From that point on, the United States was drawn into one imperial intervention after another. But beneath these wars was a more sinister operational doctrine — the British “gang-counter-gang” method. Instead of sending its own army, the empire learned to create the monsters that would destroy societies resisting its order. 🇰🇪 In Kenya, British intelligence created a fake, violent “counter-Mau Mau” to discredit the real independence movement. 🇦🇫 In Afghanistan, the CIA, following this British script, funded the mujahideen — the future Taliban and Al-Qaeda — to bleed the Soviet Union. “So this is what the creation of ISIS and al-Qaeda had — a similar effect of breaking down and destroying the society.” — Harley Schlanger The same logic birthed ISIS. The targets were always leaders and nations asserting true sovereignty: 🇱🇾 Gaddafi (planning a gold-backed African currency) 🇮🇶 Saddam Hussein (asserting economic independence) 🇦🇫 Secular Afghanistan before 1980 🇸🇾 Syria under Assad The goal is not to win. It is to break down and destroy a society, then offer endless intervention as the only solution to the chaos it engineered. From Suez to Syria, this is the unbroken thread: an empire that, when it can no longer rule directly, specializes in the management of ruin.
English
3
37
129
9.2K